An abelian group ( G , + ) {\displaystyle (G,+)} is divisible if, for every positive integer n {\displaystyle n} and every g ∈ G {\displaystyle g\in G} , there exists y ∈ G {\displaystyle y\in G} such that n y = g {\displaystyle ny=g} .1 An equivalent condition is: for any positive integer n {\displaystyle n} , n G = G {\displaystyle nG=G} , since the existence of y {\displaystyle y} for every n {\displaystyle n} and g {\displaystyle g} implies that n G ⊇ G {\displaystyle nG\supseteq G} , and the other direction n G ⊆ G {\displaystyle nG\subseteq G} is true for every group. A third equivalent condition is that an abelian group G {\displaystyle G} is divisible if and only if G {\displaystyle G} is an injective object in the category of abelian groups; for this reason, a divisible group is sometimes called an injective group.
An abelian group is p {\displaystyle p} -divisible for a prime p {\displaystyle p} if for every g ∈ G {\displaystyle g\in G} , there exists y ∈ G {\displaystyle y\in G} such that p y = g {\displaystyle py=g} . Equivalently, an abelian group is p {\displaystyle p} -divisible if and only if p G = G {\displaystyle pG=G} .
Let G be a divisible group. Then the torsion subgroup Tor(G) of G is divisible. Since a divisible group is an injective module, Tor(G) is a direct summand of G. So
As a quotient of a divisible group, G/Tor(G) is divisible. Moreover, it is torsion-free. Thus, it is a vector space over Q and so there exists a set I such that
The structure of the torsion subgroup is harder to determine, but one can show67 that for all prime numbers p there exists I p {\displaystyle I_{p}} such that
where ( T o r ( G ) ) p {\displaystyle (\mathrm {Tor} (G))_{p}} is the p-primary component of Tor(G).
Thus, if P is the set of prime numbers,
The cardinalities of the sets I and Ip for p ∈ P are uniquely determined by the group G.
Main article: Injective envelope
As stated above, any abelian group A can be uniquely embedded in a divisible group D as an essential subgroup. This divisible group D is the injective envelope of A, and this concept is the injective hull in the category of abelian groups.
An abelian group is said to be reduced if its only divisible subgroup is {0}. Every abelian group is the direct sum of a divisible subgroup and a reduced subgroup. In fact, there is a unique largest divisible subgroup of any group, and this divisible subgroup is a direct summand.8 This is a special feature of hereditary rings like the integers Z: the direct sum of injective modules is injective because the ring is Noetherian, and the quotients of injectives are injective because the ring is hereditary, so any submodule generated by injective modules is injective. The converse is a result of (Matlis 1958): if every module has a unique maximal injective submodule, then the ring is hereditary.
A complete classification of countable reduced periodic abelian groups is given by Ulm's theorem.
Several distinct definitions generalize divisible groups to divisible modules. The following definitions have been used in the literature to define a divisible module M over a ring R:
The last two conditions are "restricted versions" of the Baer's criterion for injective modules. Since injective left modules extend homomorphisms from all left ideals to R, injective modules are clearly divisible in sense 2 and 3.
If R is additionally a domain then all three definitions coincide. If R is a principal left ideal domain, then divisible modules coincide with injective modules.13 Thus in the case of the ring of integers Z, which is a principal ideal domain, a Z-module (which is exactly an abelian group) is divisible if and only if it is injective.
If R is a commutative domain, then the injective R modules coincide with the divisible R modules if and only if R is a Dedekind domain.14
Griffith, p.6 ↩
Hall, p.197 ↩
Griffith, p.17 ↩
Griffith, p.19 ↩
Lang, p. 106 ↩
Kaplansky 1965. - Kaplansky, Irving (1965). Infinite Abelian Groups. University of Michigan Press. ↩
Fuchs 1970. - Fuchs, László (1970). Infinite Abelian Groups Vol 1. Academic Press. ↩
Griffith, p.7 ↩
Feigelstock 2006. - Feigelstock, Shalom (2006), "Divisible is injective", Soochow J. Math., 32 (2): 241–243, ISSN 0250-3255, MR 2238765 https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0250-3255 ↩
Cartan & Eilenberg 1999. - Cartan, Henri; Eilenberg, Samuel (1999), Homological algebra, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. xvi+390, ISBN 0-691-04991-2, MR 1731415 https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1731415 ↩
Lam 1999. - Lam, Tsit-Yuen (1999), Lectures on modules and rings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics No. 189, vol. 189, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0525-8, ISBN 978-0-387-98428-5, MR 1653294 https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4612-0525-8 ↩
Nicholson & Yousif 2003. - Nicholson, W. K.; Yousif, M. F. (2003), Quasi-Frobenius rings, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 158, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xviii+307, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511546525, ISBN 0-521-81593-2, MR 2003785 https://doi.org/10.1017%2FCBO9780511546525 ↩
Lam 1999, p.70—73. - Lam, Tsit-Yuen (1999), Lectures on modules and rings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics No. 189, vol. 189, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0525-8, ISBN 978-0-387-98428-5, MR 1653294 https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4612-0525-8 ↩