The following standards are included in this comparison.
Antenna, RF front end enhancements and minor protocol timer tweaks have helped deploy long range P2P networks compromising on radial coverage, throughput and/or spectra efficiency (310 km & 382 km)
Notes: All speeds are theoretical maximums and will vary by a number of factors, including the use of external antennas, distance from the tower and the ground speed (e.g. communications on a train may be poorer than when standing still). Usually the bandwidth is shared between several terminals. The performance of each technology is determined by a number of constraints, including the spectral efficiency of the technology, the cell sizes used, and the amount of spectrum available.
For more comparison tables, see bit rate progress trends, comparison of mobile phone standards, spectral efficiency comparison table and OFDM system comparison table.
When discussing throughput, there is often a distinction between the peak data rate of the physical layer, the theoretical maximum data throughput and typical throughput.
The peak bit rate of the standard is the net bit rate provided by the physical layer in the fastest transmission mode (using the fastest modulation scheme and error code), excluding forward error correction coding and other physical layer overhead.
The theoretical maximum throughput for end user is clearly lower than the peak data rate due to higher layer overheads. Even this is never possible to achieve unless the test is done under perfect laboratory conditions.
The typical throughput is what users have experienced most of the time when well within the usable range to the base station. The typical throughput is hard to measure, and depends on many protocol issues such as transmission schemes (slower schemes are used at longer distance from the access point due to better redundancy), packet retransmissions and packet size. The typical throughput is often even lower because of other traffic sharing the same network or cell, interference or even the fixed line capacity from the base station onwards being limited.
Note that these figures cannot be used to predict the performance of any given standard in any given environment, but rather as benchmarks against which actual experience might be compared.
"LTE". 3GPP web site. 2009. Retrieved August 20, 2011. http://www.3gpp.org/article/lte ↩
"WiMAX and the IEEE 802.16m Air Interface Standard" (PDF). WiMax Forum. 4 April 2010. Retrieved 2012-02-07. http://www.wimaxforum.org/sites/wimaxforum.org/files/document_library/wimax_802.16m.pdf ↩
"Ericsson, Telstra Achieve World's First 200km Cell Range Mobile Broadband Coverage". www.physorg.com. http://www.physorg.com/news90664325.html ↩
"IPWireless". Archived from the original on 2007-01-01. Retrieved 2006-12-30. https://web.archive.org/web/20070101002338/http://www.ipwireless.com/technology/ ↩
"UMTS-TDD developer's frequency notes". Archived from the original on 2006-11-27. Retrieved 2006-12-30. https://web.archive.org/web/20061127195101/http://www.ipwireless.com/technology/frequency.html ↩
IEEE 802.11, List of WLAN channels /wiki/IEEE_802.11 ↩