Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
Word spacing
open-in-new
<h2 id="history">History</h2> <p>Most classical <a href="/facts/Latin/pM3Kge85">Latin</a> texts were written in <a href="/facts/Scriptio_continua/Yc8Jogxa">scriptio continua</a>, a continuous string of characters without spaces to mark word boundaries. However, some early Greek and Roman texts used <a href="/facts/Interpunct/FqdEx1gT">interpuncts</a>, small dots, to separate words. Word spacing began much later. Irish scribes first started to add word spacing to texts in the late 7th century, creating what Paul Sänger, in his book <i>The Spaces between the Words</i>, refers to as <i>aerated</i> text. By the 11th century, scribes in northern Europe were separating Latin text <i>canonically</i>, that is, with spaces between words, just as we do today in standard written text.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:1" href="#fn:1"><sup>1</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="effect-on-readability">Effect on readability</h2> <p>Word spacing is crucial for the written form because it illustrates the sound of speech where audible gaps or pauses take place.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a> With typography, word spacing shows this unspoken aspect of speech.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a> Otherwise, it would be difficult for people to read one long continuous line of letters.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a> It is hard to determine how much spacing should be put in between words, but a good typographer is able to determine proper spacing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5"><sup>5</sup></a> When text and spacing are consistent, this makes it easier to read.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6"><sup>6</sup></a> </p><p>Geoffrey Dowding describes the nature of spacing since the invention of printing from moveable type in the fifteenth century. Since the fifteenth century, the best work shows that text is to be read smoothly and efficiently.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7"><sup>7</sup></a> This is because they should always be closely spaced and “not en or em quadded!”<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8"><sup>8</sup></a> The convention of having close spacing has lasted for two reasons: because it is easier to read than text which has wider spaces and because it looks better.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:9" href="#fn:9"><sup>9</sup></a> For the first reason, adult readers take in words as units, and it would be unsuitable for “compositors, in settings not intended for young children, to break the eye’s track by introducing great gaps of white between words”.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:10" href="#fn:10"><sup>10</sup></a> Words must flow smoothly into lines.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:11" href="#fn:11"><sup>11</sup></a> For the second reason, the colour or “blackness” of the line looks better when it has close word-spacing, otherwise a widely-spaced line of text will appear grey.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:12" href="#fn:12"><sup>12</sup></a> </p><p>Language can also be a factor that typographers would take into consideration for word spacing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:13" href="#fn:13"><sup>13</sup></a> For a language like Latin, “most boundaries are marked by grammatical tags, and a smaller space is therefore sufficient”.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:14" href="#fn:14"><sup>14</sup></a> In English, the ability to read a line easily, instead of needing to make sense of it first, is also attributed by good word spacing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:15" href="#fn:15"><sup>15</sup></a> </p><p>Word spacing has the ability to express the meaning and idea behind a word, which typographers consider when working on design works and text.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:16" href="#fn:16"><sup>16</sup></a> With a written piece of text, the designer has to remember to make sure they do not add too much or too little space between words; otherwise it could ruin the texture and tone.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:17" href="#fn:17"><sup>17</sup></a> </p> <h3>Views</h3> <p><a href="/facts/Jan_Tschichold/q0r1yyFP">Jan Tschichold</a>’s rule is that “spacing should be about a middle space or the thickness of an ‘i’ in the type size used. Wide spaces should be strictly avoided.”<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:18" href="#fn:18"><sup>18</sup></a> For Tschichold, it was better for words to be broken up in order avoid wide spacing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:19" href="#fn:19"><sup>19</sup></a> Other views on this issue of wide spacing include that it could depend on the typeface to determine word spacing, so long as it does not look overspaced.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:20" href="#fn:20"><sup>20</sup></a> The perfect word space is affected by the circumstance; “at larger sizes, when letterfit is tightened, the spacing of words can be tightened as well.”<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:21" href="#fn:21"><sup>21</sup></a> Two other gentlemen have expressed different opinions on what the space between words should be. Aaron Burns, a typographer, suggested that the lowercase “r” was the best size for spaces between words.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:22" href="#fn:22"><sup>22</sup></a> <a href="/facts/Edward_Johnston/tVvFN8QR">Edward Johnston</a>, a noted calligrapher, supported that the lowercase “o” was the more appropriate size of measurement for spacing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:23" href="#fn:23"><sup>23</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="see-also">See also</h2> <ul><li><a href="/facts/Letter_spacing/ujwQE61a">Letter spacing</a></li> <li><a href="/facts/Kerning/BBIozGt4">Kerning</a></li> <li><a href="/facts/Leading/81M1dEYW">Leading</a></li></ul> <h2 id="external-links">External links</h2> <ul><li><a href="http://www.oakknoll.com/bookexcerpt.php?booknr=79445">"The School of Close Spacing"</a>, excerpt from <i>Book Typography</i>, by Ari Rafaeli</li></ul> <h2 id="external-references">External references</h2> <ul><li><i>Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type</i>, Geoffrey Dowding</li></ul> <h2 id="references">References</h2> <ol> <li id="fn:1"><p>Saenger, Paul (1997). Space Between Words. Stanford University Press. <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:2"><p>Lupton, Ellen (2004). Thinking with Type. Princeton Architectural Press. p. 67. <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:3"><p>Lupton, Ellen (2004). Thinking with Type. Princeton Architectural Press. p. 67. <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:4"><p>Lupton, Ellen (2004). Thinking with Type. Princeton Architectural Press. p. 67. <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:5"><p>Carter, R.; Day, B.; Meggs, P. (2002). Typographic Design: Form and Communication (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 92. <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:6"><p>Carter, R.; Day, B.; Meggs, P. (2002). Typographic Design: Form and Communication (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 92. <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:7"><p>Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:8"><p>Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:9"><p>Dowding 1995, p. 5. - Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:9" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:10"><p>Dowding 1995, p. 5. - Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:10" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:11"><p>Carter, Day & Meggs 2002, p. 91. - Carter, R.; Day, B.; Meggs, P. (2002). Typographic Design: Form and Communication (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 92. <a href="#fnref:11" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:12"><p>Dowding 1995, p. 5. - Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:12" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:13"><p>Bringhurst, Robert (1997). The Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks Publishers, Inc. p. 26. <a href="#fnref:13" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:14"><p>Bringhurst 1997, p. 26. - Bringhurst, Robert (1997). The Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks Publishers, Inc. p. 26. <a href="#fnref:14" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:15"><p>Bringhurst 1997, p. 26. - Bringhurst, Robert (1997). The Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks Publishers, Inc. p. 26. <a href="#fnref:15" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:16"><p>Lupton 2004, p. 104. - Lupton, Ellen (2004). Thinking with Type. Princeton Architectural Press. p. 67. <a href="#fnref:16" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:17"><p>Carter, Day & Meggs 2002, p. 91. - Carter, R.; Day, B.; Meggs, P. (2002). Typographic Design: Form and Communication (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 92. <a href="#fnref:17" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:18"><p>Dowding 1995, p. 8. - Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:18" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:19"><p>Dowding 1995, p. 8. - Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:19" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:20"><p>Dowding 1995, p. 8. - Dowding, Geoffrey (1995). Finer Points in the Spacing & Arrangement of Type. Hartley & Marks Publishers Inc. p. 3. <a href="#fnref:20" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:21"><p>Bringhurst 1997, p. 26. - Bringhurst, Robert (1997). The Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks Publishers, Inc. p. 26. <a href="#fnref:21" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:22"><p>Carter, Day & Meggs 2002, p. 92. - Carter, R.; Day, B.; Meggs, P. (2002). Typographic Design: Form and Communication (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 92. <a href="#fnref:22" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:23"><p>Carter, Day & Meggs 2002, p. 92. - Carter, R.; Day, B.; Meggs, P. (2002). Typographic Design: Form and Communication (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 92. <a href="#fnref:23" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> </ol>