Precursors to modern rocketry, such as fireworks and rocket launchers, did not generally require dedicated launch pads. This was due in part to their relatively portable size, as well as the sufficiency of their casings in sustaining stresses. One of the first pads for a liquid-fueled rocket, what would later be named the Goddard Rocket Launching Site after Robert H. Goddard's series of launch tests starting in 1926, consisted of a mount situated on an open field in rural Massachusetts. The mount consisted of a frame with a series of gasoline and liquid oxygen lines feeding into the rocket.
It wasn't until the 1930s that rockets were increasing enough in size and strength that specialized launch facilities became necessary. The Verein für Raumschiffahrt in Germany was permitted after a request for funding in 1930 to move from farms to the Berlin rocket launching site (German: Raketenflugplatz Berlin), a repurposed ammunition dump.3
A test stand was built for liquid-propellant rockets in Kummersdorf in 1932, where the early designs from the Aggregat series of ballistic missiles were afterwards developed. This site was also the location of the first casualties in rocket development, when Dr. Wahmke and 2 assistants were killed, and another assistant was injured. A propellant fuel tank exploded, while experimenting with mixing 90% hydrogen peroxide and alcohol, before combustion.4: 35 5: 52–53
In May 1937, Dornberger, and most of his staff, moved to the Peenemünde Army Research Center on the island of Usedom on the Baltic coast which offered much greater space and secrecy. Dr. Thiel and his staff followed in the summer of 1940. Test Stand VI at Pennemünde was an exact replica to Kummersdorf's large test stand.6: 56, 60 7: 57 It was this site which saw the development of the V-2 rocket. Test Stand VII was the principle testing facility at the Peenemünde Airfield and was capable of static firing rocket motors with up to 200 tons of thrust.
Launch pads would increase in complexity over the following decades throughout and following the Space Race. Where large volumes of exhaust gases are expelled during engine testing or vehicle launch, a flame deflector might be implemented to mitigate damage to the surrounding pad and direct exhaust. This is especially important with reusable launch vehicles to increase efficiency of launches while minimizing time spent refurbishing.
Main article: Spaceport § Location
The construction of a launch pad begins with site selection, considering various geographical and logistical factors. It is often advantageous to position the launch pad on the coast, particularly with the ocean to the east, to leverage the Earth's rotation and increase the specific impulse of launches. Space programs such as Soviet space program or the French space program without this luxury may utilize facilities outside of their main territory such as the Baikonur Cosmodrome or Guiana Space Centre to launch for them. This orientation also allows for safe trajectory paths, minimizing risks to populated areas during ascent.8
Main article: Mobile launcher platform
Each launch site is unique, but a few broad types can be described by the means by which the space vehicle gets to the pad.
Main article: Service structure
A service structure is a steel framework or tower that is built on a launch pad to facilitate assembly and servicing.
An umbilical tower also usually includes an elevator which allows maintenance and crew access. Immediately before ignition of the rocket's motors, all connections between the tower and the craft are severed, and the bridges over which these connections pass often quickly swing away to prevent damage to the structure or vehicle.
Main article: Flame deflector
A flame deflector, flame diverter or flame trench is a structure or device designed to redirect or disperse the flame, heat, and exhaust gases produced by rocket engines or other propulsion systems.11 The amount of thrust generated by a rocket launch, along with the sound it produces during liftoff, can damage the launchpad and service structure, as well as the launch vehicle.12 The primary goal of the diverter is to prevent the flame from causing damage to equipment, infrastructure, or the surrounding environment. Flame diverters can be found at rocket launch sites and test stands where large volumes of exhaust gases are expelled during engine testing or vehicle launch.
Main article: Sound suppression system
Sites for launching large rockets are often equipped with a sound suppression system to absorb or deflect acoustic energy generated during a rocket launch. As engine exhaust gasses exceed the speed of sound, they collide with the ambient air and shockwaves are created, with noise levels approaching 200 db. This energy can be reflected by the launch platform and pad surfaces, and could potentially cause damage to the launch vehicle, payload, and crew. For instance, the maximum admissible overall sound power level (OASPL) for payload integrity is approximately 145 db.13 Sound is dissipated by huge volumes of water distributed across the launch pad and launch platform during liftoff.1415
Water-based acoustic suppression systems are common on launch pads. They aid in reducing acoustic energy by injecting large quantities of water below the launch pad into the exhaust plume and in the area above the pad. Flame deflectors or flame trenches are designed to channel rocket exhaust away from the launch pad but also redirect acoustic energy away.1617
In rockets using liquid hydrogen as their source of propellant, hydrogen burn-off systems (HBOI), also known as radially outward firing igniters (ROFI), can be utilized to prevent the build up of free gaseous hydrogen (GH2) in the aft engine area of the vehicle prior to engine start. Too much excess hydrogen in the aft during engine start can result in an overpressure blast wave that could damage the launch vehicle and surrounding pad structures.18
The SpaceX launch sequence includes a hold-down feature of the launch pad that allows full engine ignition and systems check before liftoff. After the first-stage engine starts, the launcher is held down and not released for flight until all propulsion and vehicle systems are confirmed to be operating normally. Similar hold-down systems have been used on launch vehicles such as Saturn V19 and Space Shuttle. An automatic safe shut-down and unloading of propellant occur if any abnormal conditions are detected.20 Prior to the launch date, SpaceX sometimes completes a test cycle, culminating in a three-and-a-half second first stage engine static firing as well.2122
Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 175. ISBN 9780850451634. 9780850451634 ↩
"A8FJ - Day 1: Launch and Ascent to Earth Orbit". www.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2024-11-20. https://www.nasa.gov/history/afj/ap08fj/01launch_ascent.html ↩
"Highlights in German Rocket Development". Archived from the original on 21 August 2007. Retrieved 14 June 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20070821043454/http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/german/highlights.html ↩
Dornberger, Walter (1954). V-2. New York: The Viking Press, Inc. pp. 27–42. ↩
Fleischer, Wolfgang (1997). The Wehrmacht Weapons Testing Ground at Kummersdorf. Atglen: Schiffer Publishing Ltd. pp. 9–46. ISBN 9780764302732. 9780764302732 ↩
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2006). "Building KSC's Launch Complex 39" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 2024-07-12. https://public.ksc.nasa.gov/partnerships/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2023/03/Buildings-KSC-pad-VAB-LCC-O_C.pdf ↩
"LAUNCH COMPLEX 39, PADS A AND B". NASA KSC. 1992. Archived from the original on 2008-09-21. https://web.archive.org/web/20080921222509/http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/release/1985/252-85r.htm ↩
"Cpsb Launchpad". Viswanath. 2023. Archived from the original on 2023-06-16. Retrieved 2023-06-16. https://web.archive.org/web/20230616125001/https://cpsblaunchpad.com/cpsb-launchpad-4/ ↩
"Moonport, CH11-7". www.hq.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2023-09-01. Retrieved 2023-09-01. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-4204/ch11-7.html ↩
Wessels, Wessel (2022-10-26). "The Purpose Of A Flame Trench At A Rocket Launch Site". Headed For Space. Archived from the original on 2023-09-01. Retrieved 2023-09-01. https://headedforspace.com/flame-trench/ ↩
Dougherty, N. S., & Guest, S. H. (2012, August 17). A correlation of scale model and flight aeroacoustic data for the Space Shuttle Vehicle. Aeroacoustics Conferences. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1984-2351 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1984-2351 ↩
Lubert, Caroline Parsons (2017). "Sixty years of launch vehicle acoustics". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 142 (4): 040004. Bibcode:2017ASAJ..142.2489L. doi:10.1121/1.5014084. https://doi.org/10.1121%2F1.5014084 ↩
Walsh, E. J.; Hart, P.M. (Nov 1982). "Liftoff Ignition Overpressure-A Correlation". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 19 (6): 550–556. Bibcode:1982JSpRo..19..550W. doi:10.2514/3.62300. ISSN 0022-4650. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
"Acoustic Loads Generated by the Propulsion System (NASA SP-8072)" (PDF). June 1971. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710023719.pdf ↩
Gebhardt, Chris (June 1, 2015). "Heritage hardware: Testing the hydrogen burn off system for SLS". NASASpaceFlight.com. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/06/heritage-hardware-hydrogen-burn-off-system-sls/ ↩
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain: "Hold-Down Arms and Tail Service Masts". NASA. Archived from the original on November 2, 2016. Retrieved June 24, 2017. /wiki/Public_domain ↩
"Falcon 9 Overview (2010)". SpaceX. Archived from the original on 22 December 2010. Retrieved 8 May 2010. https://web.archive.org/web/20101222155322/http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php ↩
Clark, Stephen (20 December 2014). "Falcon 9 completes full-duration static fire". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 5 June 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015. SpaceX conducts the static fire test — that typically ends with a 3.5-second engine firing — before every launch to wring out issues with the rocket and ground systems. The exercise also helps engineers rehearse for the real launch day. http://spaceflightnow.com/2014/12/20/falcon-9-completes-full-duration-static-fire/ ↩
Clark, Stephen. "Starlink satellite deployments continue with successful Falcon 9 launch". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 27 July 2020. https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/06/13/starlink-satellite-deployments-continue-with-successful-falcon-9-launch/ ↩