See also: Natural-gas condensate
Raw natural gas typically consists primarily of methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6), the shortest and lightest hydrocarbon molecules. It often also contains varying amounts of:
Raw natural gas must be purified to meet the quality standards specified by the major pipeline transmission and distribution companies. Those quality standards vary from pipeline to pipeline and are usually a function of a pipeline system's design and the markets that it serves. In general, the standards specify that the natural gas:
January
February
March
November
October
September
August
The natural gas should:
There are a variety of ways in which to configure the various unit processes used in the treatment of raw natural gas. The block flow diagram below is a generalized, typical configuration for the processing of raw natural gas from non-associated gas wells showing how raw natural gas is processed into sales gas piped to the end user markets.2122232425 and various byproducts:
Raw natural gas is commonly collected from a group of adjacent wells and is first processed in a separator vessels at that collection point for removal of free liquid water and natural gas condensate.29 The condensate is usually then transported to an oil refinery and the water is treated and disposed of as wastewater.
The raw gas is then piped to a gas processing plant where the initial purification is usually the removal of acid gases (hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide). There are several processes available for that purpose as shown in the flow diagram, but amine treating is the process that was historically used. However, due to a range of performance and environmental constraints of the amine process, a newer technology based on the use of polymeric membranes to separate the carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide from the natural gas stream has gained increasing acceptance. Membranes are attractive since no reagents are consumed.30
The acid gases, if present, are removed by membrane or amine treating and can then be routed into a sulfur recovery unit which converts the hydrogen sulfide in the acid gas into either elemental sulfur or sulfuric acid. Of the processes available for these conversions, the Claus process is by far the most well known for recovering elemental sulfur, whereas the conventional Contact process and the WSA (Wet sulfuric acid process) are the most used technologies for recovering sulfuric acid. Smaller quantities of acid gas may be disposed of by flaring.
The residual gas from the Claus process is commonly called tail gas and that gas is then processed in a tail gas treating unit (TGTU) to recover and recycle residual sulfur-containing compounds back into the Claus unit. Again, as shown in the flow diagram, there are a number of processes available for treating the Claus unit tail gas and for that purpose a WSA process is also very suitable since it can work autothermally on tail gases.
The next step in the gas processing plant is to remove water vapor from the gas using either the regenerable absorption in liquid triethylene glycol (TEG),31 commonly referred to as glycol dehydration, deliquescent chloride desiccants, and or a Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) unit which is regenerable adsorption using a solid adsorbent.32 Other newer processes like membranes may also be considered.
Mercury is then removed by using adsorption processes (as shown in the flow diagram) such as activated carbon or regenerable molecular sieves.33
Although not common, nitrogen is sometimes removed and rejected using one of the three processes indicated on the flow diagram:
The NGL fractionation process treats offgas from the separators at an oil terminal or the overhead fraction from a crude distillation column in a refinery. Fractionation aims to produce useful products including natural gas suitable for piping to industrial and domestic consumers; liquefied petroleum gases (Propane and Butane) for sale; and gasoline feedstock for liquid fuel blending.37 The recovered NGL stream is processed through a fractionation train consisting of up to five distillation towers in series: a demethanizer, a deethanizer, a depropanizer, a debutanizer and a butane splitter. The fractionation train typically uses a cryogenic low temperature distillation process involving expansion of the recovered NGL through a turbo-expander followed by distillation in a demethanizing fractionating column.3839 Some gas processing plants use lean oil absorption process40 rather than the cryogenic turbo-expander process.
The gaseous feed to the NGL fractionation plant is typically compressed to about 60 bar and 37 °C.41 The feed is cooled to -22 °C, by exchange with the demethanizer overhead product and by a refrigeration system and is split into three streams:
The overhead product is mainly methane at 20 bar and -98 °C. This is heated and compressed to yield a sales gas at 20 bar and 40 °C. The bottom product is NGL at 20 barg which is fed to the deethanizer.
The overhead product from the deethanizer is ethane and the bottoms are fed to the depropanizer. The overhead product from the depropanizer is propane and the bottoms are fed to the debutanizer. The overhead product from the debutanizer is a mixture of normal and iso-butane, and the bottoms product is a C5+ gasoline mixture.
The operating conditions of the vessels in the NGL fractionation train are typically as follows.434445
A typical composition of the feed and product is as follows.46
The recovered streams of propane, butanes and C5+ may be "sweetened" in a Merox process unit to convert undesirable mercaptans into disulfides and, along with the recovered ethane, are the final NGL by-products from the gas processing plant. Currently, most cryogenic plants do not include fractionation for economic reasons, and the NGL stream is instead transported as a mixed product to standalone fractionation complexes located near refineries or chemical plants that use the components for feedstock. In case laying pipeline is not possible for geographical reason, or the distance between source and consumer exceed 3000 km, natural gas is then transported by ship as LNG (liquefied natural gas) and again converted into its gaseous state in the vicinity of the consumer.
The residue gas from the NGL recovery section is the final, purified sales gas which is pipelined to the end-user markets. Rules and agreements are made between buyer and seller regarding the quality of the gas. These usually specify the maximum allowable concentration of CO2, H2S and H2O as well as requiring the gas to be commercially free from objectionable odours and materials, and dust or other solid or liquid matter, waxes, gums and gum forming constituents, which might damage or adversely affect operation of the buyers equipment. When an upset occurs on the treatment plant buyers can usually refuse to accept the gas, lower the flow rate or re-negotiate the price.
If the gas has significant helium content, the helium may be recovered by fractional distillation. Natural gas may contain as much as 7% helium, and is the commercial source of the noble gas.47 For instance, the Hugoton Gas Field in Kansas and Oklahoma in the United States contains concentrations of helium from 0.3% to 1.9%, which is separated out as a valuable byproduct.48
"PHMSA: Stakeholder Communications - NG Processing Plants". primis.phmsa.dot.gov. Retrieved 9 April 2018. http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/FactSheets/FSNaturalGasProcessingPlants.htm ↩
Speight, James G. (2015). Handbook of Petroleum Product Analysis, Second Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-118-36926-5. 978-1-118-36926-5 ↩
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2014-09-21.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) https://web.archive.org/web/20160305070520/https://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/NaturalGas_Chapter2_Supply.pdf ↩
Kidnay, Arthur J.; Parrish, William R.; McCartney, Daniel G. (2019). Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing, Third Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-429-87715-5. 978-0-429-87715-5 ↩
Agency, United States Central Intelligence (1977). Natural Gas. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. p. 25. ↩
U.S. Crude Oil Production Forecast- Analysis of Crude Types (PDF), Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 29 May 2014, p. 7, A final point to consider involves the distinction between the very light grades of lease condensate (which are included in EIA's oil production data) and hydrocarbon gas liquids (HGL) that are produced from the wellhead as gas but are converted to liquids when separated from methane at a natural gas processing plant. These hydrocarbons include ethane, propane, butanes, and hydrocarbons with five or more carbon atoms – referred to as pentanes plus, naptha, or plant condensate. Plant condensate can also be blended with crude oil, which would change both the distribution and total volume of oil received by refineries. http://www.eia.gov/analysis/petroleum/crudetypes/pdf/crudetypes.pdf ↩
"Mercury Removal from Natural Gas and Liquids" (PDF). UOP LLC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-01-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20110101194809/http://www.uop.com/objects/87MercuryRemoval.pdf ↩
"Radium in Piping". https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/getauthorversionpdf/C8EM00336J ↩
"Gas Safety (Management) Regulations 1996". legislation.co.uk. 1996. Retrieved 13 June 2020. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/551/contents/made ↩
Institute of Petroleum (1978). A guide to North Sea oil and gas technology. London: Heyden & Son. p. 133. ISBN 0855013168. 0855013168 ↩
Dehydration of Natural Gas Archived 2007-02-24 at the Wayback Machine by Prof. Jon Steiner Gudmundsson, Norwegian University of Science and Technology http://www.ipt.ntnu.no/~jsg/undervisning/naturgass/parlaktuna/Chap7.pdf ↩
Glycol Dehydration Archived 2009-09-12 at the Wayback Machine (includes a flow diagram) http://www.processgroup.com.au/Technologies/GasProcessing/GlycolDehyrdation/tabid/84/Default.aspx ↩
Desulfurization of and Mercury Removal From Natural Gas Archived 2008-03-03 at the Wayback Machine by Bourke, M.J. and Mazzoni, A.F., Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Oklahoma, March 1989. http://www.tigg.com/ACTIVATED-CARBON/desulfurization.html ↩
Using Gas Geochemistry to Assess Mercury Risk Archived 2015-08-28 at the Wayback Machine, OilTracers, 2006 http://www.gaschem.com/mercur.html ↩
Natural Gas Processing: The Crucial Link Between Natural Gas Production and Its Transportation to Market Archived 2011-03-04 at the Wayback Machine http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/feature_articles/2006/ngprocess/ngprocess.pdf ↩
Example Gas Plant Archived 2010-12-01 at the Wayback Machine http://www.uop.com/gasprocessing/6070.html ↩
From Purification to Liquefaction Gas Processing Archived 2010-01-15 at the Wayback Machine http://www.axens.net/upload/presentations/fichier/axens_gpagcc_2004v2.pdf ↩
"Feed-Gas Treatment Design for the Pearl GTL Project" (PDF). spe.org. Retrieved 9 April 2018. http://www.spe.org/specma/binary/files/5804785Syn10682.pdf ↩
Benefits of integrating NGL extraction and LNG liquefaction Archived 2013-06-26 at the Wayback Machine http://lnglicensing.conocophillips.com/EN/publications/documents/AICHELNGNGLIntegrationPaper.pdf ↩
"MSDS: Natural gas liquids" (PDF). ConocoPhillips. http://www.conocophillips.com/sustainable-development/Documents/SMID_213_Natural%20Gas%20Liquids.pdf ↩
"What are natural gas liquids and how are they used?". United States Energy Information Administration. April 20, 2012. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=5930 ↩
"Guide to Understanding Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids". STI Group. 2014-02-19. http://setxind.com/energy-markets/guide-to-understanding-natural-gas-and-natural-gas-liquids/ ↩
"Liquid / Gas Separation Technology - Oil & Gas | Pall Corporation". www.pall.com. Retrieved 2023-04-22. https://www.pall.com/en/oil-gas/midstream/liquid-gas-separation-technology.html ↩
Baker, R. W. "Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology" Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411. doi:10.1021/ie0108088 /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Molecular Sieves Archived 2011-01-01 at the Wayback Machine (includes a flow diagram of a PSA unit) http://www.uop.com/objects/96%20MolecularSieves.pdf ↩
Gas Processes 2002, Hydrocarbon Processing, pages 84–86, May 2002 (schematic flow diagrams and descriptions of the Nitrogen Rejection and Nitrogen Removal processes) ↩
Market-Driven Evolution of Gas Processing Technologies for NGLs Advanced Extraction Technology Inc. website page http://www.aet.com/gtip1.htm ↩
AET Process Nitrogen Rejection Unit Advanced Extraction Technology Inc. website page http://www.aet.com/aetnrubig.pdf ↩
Manley, D. B. (1998). "Thermodynamically efficient distillation: NGL Fractionation". Latin American Applied Research. ↩
Cryogenic Turbo-Expander Process Advanced Extraction Technology Inc. website page http://www.aet.com/turbo.htm ↩
Gas Processes 2002, Hydrocarbon Processing, pages 83–84, May 2002 (schematic flow diagrams and descriptions of the NGL-Pro and NGL Recovery processes) ↩
Muneeb Nawaz ‘Synthesis and Design of Demethaniser Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes,' University of Manchester, unpublished PhD thesis, 2011, pp. 137, 138, 154 ↩
Luyben, W. L. (2013). "Control of a Train of Distillation Columns for the Separation of natural gas". Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 52: 5710741–10753. doi:10.1021/ie400869v. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
ElBadawy, K. M.; Teamah, M. A.; Shehata, A. I.; Hanfy, A. A. (2017). "Simulation of LPG Production from Natural Gas using Fractionation Towers". International Journal of Advanced Scientific and Technical Research. 6 (7). ↩
Winter, Mark (2008). "Helium: the essentials". University of Sheffield. Retrieved 2008-07-14. http://www.webelements.com/helium/ ↩
Dwight E. Ward and Arthur P. Pierce (1973) "Helium" in United States Mineral Resources, US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 820, p.285-290. ↩