The latest Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing5 reflect Samuel Messick's model of validity6 and do not use the term "predictive validity." Rather, the Standards describe validity-supporting "Evidence Based on Relationships [between the test scores and] Other Variables."
Predictive validity involves testing a group of subjects for a certain construct, and then comparing them with results obtained at some point in the future.
Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity for psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.[1] http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Cronbach/construct.htm ↩
The Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) endorses this definition as part of its ongoing Common Language in Marketing Project. /wiki/Marketing_Accountability_Standards_Board ↩
"Where Predictive Validity May Fail To Make The Grade". https://kleinconsultants.com/where-predictive-validity-may-fail-to-make-the-grade/ ↩
"Do Psychometric Tests Work?". https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/do-psychometric-tests-work-dr-mark-parkinson ↩
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. ↩
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. ↩