Having asked the sailors for something (allowance) for their shoes, since they had to walk frequently from Ostia and Pozzuoli to Rome, Vespasian did not think it right not to have given them an answer, so he added that the order was to go barefoot, so much so that it is still done that way today [Suetonius' time].— Suetonius, Life of Vespasian, 8.
Having asked the sailors for something (allowance) for their shoes, since they had to walk frequently from Ostia and Pozzuoli to Rome, Vespasian did not think it right not to have given them an answer, so he added that the order was to go barefoot, so much so that it is still done that way today [Suetonius' time].
The core of a naval crew was formed by the oarsmen (in Latin remiges, sing. remex; in Greek eretai, sing. eretēs). Contrary to popular belief, the Roman navy, as well as that of ancient times in general, based its existence on oarsmen of free status, not on slaves, who on the contrary were used only in cases of extreme necessity, so much so that they were then made free prematurely.9 During the Roman Empire, provincials, not yet Roman citizens but freeborn (peregrini) from Greece, Phoenicia, Syria and Egypt, formed the main core of fleet crews.1011
During the Republican period, the command of the fleet was entrusted to a magistrate or promagistrate, normally of consular or praetorian rank.12 During the Punic Wars, for example, one consul commanded the fleet, while the other commanded the land army. In later wars waged in the East, praetors assumed command of the fleet. However, since these men had political appointments, the actual management of fleets or naval squadrons was entrusted to their subordinates, the certainly more experienced legati. It was therefore during the Punic Wars that the figure of the praefectus classis appeared for the first time.13
During the early principate, a ship's crew, beyond its size, was nevertheless organized as a centuria. They were framed in fact as soldiers (miles classiarii), maneuverers (remiges and velarii), construction workers (fabri navales) and other duties. The personnel of the fleet were considered inferior, not only to those of the legions, but also to those of the auxiliary troops.14
As in the Roman army, each ship, organized in centuria, was placed under the command of a centurio classiarius, who had in the optio his most trusted subordinate. The beneficiarius, on the other hand, lent a hand at the administrative level.15 Among the crew there were a certain number of both principales and immunes, exactly as was the case in the auxiliary troops.
Regarding high command, on the other hand, during the imperial period, with Augustus the praefectus classis became procurator Augusti, at the head of each permanent fleet. These posts were initially filled by those who belonged to the equestrian order, or beginning with Claudius, by his freedmen, thus ensuring direct imperial control over the various fleets.16 With the Flavian dynasty, the status of praefectus was entrusted only to knights with military experience, who had made a career in the equestrian militiae.1718 Again, the prefect, though endowed with military experience, was nevertheless a politician with little naval knowledge, so much so that he relied on subordinates.19
Great expertise and responsibility was required of the classiarii, particularly of some key figures:
Finally, it is estimated that there were about 40,000 to 50,000 classiarii during the Early Roman Empire, organized according to the following hierarchical structure:
Other important roles on ships, probably falling within the group of immunes were, according to an inscription found at Kos during the First Mithridatic War:
In order to prevent the boats from being recognized when exploring, they were dyed blue (the color of the sea waves), along with their ropes and sails, to better camouflage themselves.38 The same thing applied to the crew of the classiarii, who wore blue uniforms so that they could remain hidden, not only at night but also during the day.39
Fleet personnel (Classiarii) were divided into two groups: sailors and soldiers. Service lasted 26 years40 (as opposed to 20 for the legionaries and 25 for the auxilia). From the third century it was increased to 28 years of service. Upon discharge (Honesta missio) sailors were given a severance pay, land and usually also granted citizenship, as they were in the status of peregrini at the time of enlistment.4142 Marriage, on the other hand, was allowed to them only at the end of permanent active service.43
There was a substantial difference in stipendium between the high ranks of command: the prefects of the two praetoriae fleets (Misenensis and Ravennatis), were classified as procuratores ducenarii, i.e., they earned 200,000 sesterces annually; the prefect of the Classis Germanica, Classis Britannica, and later the Classis Pontica, on the other hand, were procuratores centenarii (earning 100,000 sesterces), while the other prefects were also called procuratores sexagenarii (i.e., they earned 60,000 sesterces).44
A Legio XVII Classica, i.e., naval, probably distinct from one under Octavian that bore the same numbering, was part of Mark Antony's army and had to disappear after his defeat at Actium. A similar fate befell the Legio XXX Classica, which appears to have been stationed in Asia in late Republican times.45
Two more "naval" legions were, therefore, enlisted under Nero in 68 (the I Adiutrix from the classis Misenensis), as well as one of its "twins" in 69 by Vespasian (the II Adiutrix Pia Fidelis46).
Yann Le Bohec, L'esercito romano, Roma 1992, pp. 33 e seg. ↩
Alessandro Milan, Le forze armate nella storia di Roma antica, XII, p. 118. ↩
Saddington (2007, p. 212) - Saddington, D. B. (2007). "Classes. The Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets". In Erdkamp, Paul (ed.). A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. ↩
L. Keppie, The making of the roman army, from Republic to Empire, p. 213. ↩
Tacitus, Historiae, 86; III, 7 e 21. AE 1972, 203. /wiki/Tacitus ↩
Webster & Elton (1998), p. 166. ↩
Wesch-Klein (1998), p. 25. ↩
Casson (1991), p. 188. ↩
Starr (1960), p. 75 Table 1. ↩
Rodgers (1976), p. 60. ↩
Livy, Ab Urbe condita libri, XXVI, 48; XXXVI, 42. /wiki/Livy ↩
Webster & Elton (1998), p. 165. ↩
A Companion to the Roman Army, p. 210. ↩
Rankov (1995, p. 80) - Rankov, Boris (1995). "Fleets of the Early Roman Empire, 31 BC–AD 324". In Morrison, John S.; Gardiner, Robert (eds.). The Age of the Galley: Mediterranean Oared Vessels Since Pre-Classical Times. London: Conway Maritime Press. pp. 78–85. ISBN 0-85177-554-3. https://archive.org/details/ageofgalleymedit0000unse ↩
Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris, IV, 43.1. /wiki/Vegetius ↩
Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris, IV, 43.3. /wiki/Vegetius ↩
Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris, IV, 32.1. /wiki/Vegetius ↩
Saddington (2007, p. 210.) - Saddington, D. B. (2007). "Classes. The Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets". In Erdkamp, Paul (ed.). A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. ↩
Starr (1960), pp. 42-43. ↩
Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris, IV, 32.2. /wiki/Vegetius ↩
Starr (1960), p. 39. ↩
Webster & Elton (1998), pp. 165-166. ↩
Saddington (2007, pp. 210–211) - Saddington, D. B. (2007). "Classes. The Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets". In Erdkamp, Paul (ed.). A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. ↩
Saddington (2007, pp. 201–202) - Saddington, D. B. (2007). "Classes. The Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets". In Erdkamp, Paul (ed.). A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. ↩
Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris, IV, 37.5. /wiki/Vegetius ↩
Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris, IV, 37.6. /wiki/Vegetius ↩
AE 2006, 1861. /wiki/L%27Ann%C3%A9e_%C3%A9pigraphique ↩
CIL XVI, 1. /wiki/Corpus_Inscriptionum_Latinarum ↩
Pflaum, H.G. (1950). Les procurateurs équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain, pp. 50-53. http://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/equesproc.html ↩
AE 1997, 1416. /wiki/L%27Ann%C3%A9e_%C3%A9pigraphique ↩
Tacitus, Historiae, III, 50 e 55. /wiki/Tacitus ↩