In 1938 RCA engineer Stuart William Seeley, while attempting to remove "ghost" signals from an experimental television system, realized that he could measure distances by time differences in radio reception. In summer 1940, Seeley proposed building SHORAN for the Army Air Force. Contract was awarded 9 months later, and SHORAN given its first military flight tests in August 1942. First procurement was spring 1944, with initial combat operations in northern Italy on December 11, 1944.
During the system's development, Seeley and an RCA manager flew to England to describe the system to American and British air force personnel. There they observed the Oboe, which could guide only a single aircraft, unlike Shoran which could guide multiple. On the return flight, nearly all information on Shoran was lost in a plane crash, and Seeley was forced to recreate the records from his own memory. He received a Magellanic award for his work in 1960.1
SHORAN, which operates at 300 MHz, requires an airborne AN/APN-3 set and two AN/CPN-2 or 2A ground stations. The equipment on board the aircraft includes a transmitter, a receiver, an operator's console and a K-1A model bombing computer. The transmitter sends pulses to one of the ground stations and the system calculates the range in statute miles by clocking the elapsed time between transmitter pulse and the returned signal. The system was intended for use in navigation, but it became obvious that it would work well for blind targeting during bombing runs in poor visibility. The setup made up of the K-1A bombing computer combined with the navigation system was the first SHORAN. The SHORAN system is designed so that as the aircraft faces the target, the low-frequency station should be on the left, and the high-frequency station is on the right. This allows the computer to triangulate the two stations and the target.
The limitations of SHORAN included:
Little new top-of-the-line technology was used in Korea, but SHORAN was an exception. B-26 planes were first equipped with the system in January, 1951, and first carried it into battle the following month.
Some problems immediately recognized were that ground stations tended to be too far from the targets, the ground and aircraft equipment was not maintained properly, few technicians knew how to work the equipment, and operators were too unfamiliar with Korean geography to use the system to the fullest extent.
Changes were made and by June 1951 ground stations were located in more useful areas, such as islands and mountaintops, and training of operators and technicians familiarized them with the system. By November 1952 these changes had developed SHORAN into a reliable accurate blind-bombing system which was used by B-29 and B-26 aircraft for the remainder of the war.
During the Retriangulation of Great Britain between 1935 and 1962, the Ordnance Survey primary triangulation of the British Isles was connected to both Norway and Iceland using HIRAN, an enhanced version of SHORAN. Survey connections extending from primary triangulation points in Scotland to triangulation points in Norway and Iceland were facilitated by the US Air Force under the implementation of a project known as the North Atlantic Tie.234
Shortly after World War II, the US Air Force had carried out a readjustment of all the triangulations of continental Europe to produce a geodetic datum known as ED50, a single system on the Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system. The North Atlantic Tie initiative aimed to create a geodetic link between North America and Europe, by measuring a trilateration network, and permitting the positioning of European triangulation stations relative to the North American Datum.5
From July to September 1953, the US Air Force used HIRAN to survey a link between three geodetic stations in Norway and three on the Scottish mainland and Shetland islands. This marked the initial phase of a larger project which connected surveys of Norway, Iceland, and Greenland to Canada.6 The network linking Scotland to Norway comprised fifteen measured lines: three among the Norwegian stations, three among the Scottish and Shetlandic stations, and nine lines across the North Sea.7
The SHORAN geodetic stations did not precisely match the geodetic triangulation stations, but the proximity was considered such that no significant error was ascribed to the transfer from one to the other.8 The Norwegian stations were:
And the British stations were:
Each of the fifteen survey lines was gauged by six line crossings at each of two altitude levels, totalling twelve crossings, all forming part of a survey mission. The distance between two survey stations was derived from the minimum sum of the signal transit times from a transmitter, carried in an aircraft flying across the line to be measured, to a pair of terminals at each end of the line and back. A mission was approved provided:
The most inaccurate of the rejected survey missions deviated from the accepted measure by 0.0055 miles (29 feet), and the average disparity between a rejected measure and the mean of the accepted measures was 0.0013 miles (6 feet). The final results and assessment were computed from observation of ground survey positions, including stations in both Iceland and the Faroe Islands.10
The operation was largely successful, but the Ordnance Survey considered that the results were not of a geodetic standard necessary for primary triangulation, and a 12 metres (39 ft) discrepancy existed in the measurements between Norwegian stations.11
Beginning in the late 1940s and continuing into the 1980s surplus SHORAN systems had become widely used to provide precision navigation in oil and gas exploration industry. Companies like pioneer Offshore Navigation, Inc., Navigation Management, Coastal Surveys (based in Singapore) and Western Geophysical deployed SHORAN receivers to navigate seismic survey vessels and position drilling rigs around the world. The technology was key to the successful development of the offshore oil & gas industry in the postwar era. Truck-portable SHORAN transponders and up to 90-foot-tall (27 m) antennas were set up within a few feet of geodesic survey markers near the coast. SHORAN chains consisting of three or four shore stations were used to provide highly accurate navigation across large exploration tracts and as much as 200 miles (320 km) offshore. Frequently, the massive vacuum tube transmitters were fitted with solid-state control boxes for more reliable operation and to improve reception of weaker signals over the horizon.
The Magellanic Premium of the American Philosophical Society http://www.amphilsoc.org/prizes/magellanic.htm ↩
Heiskanen, W.A. (1955). "New Era of Geodesy". Science. 121 (3133): 48–50. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 1682215. Retrieved 5 August 2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1682215 ↩
Edge, R.C.A. (1967). The History of the Retriangulation of Great Britain, 1935-1962. London: H.M. Stationery Office. Retrieved 5 August 2023. https://books.google.com/books?id=M5ULAQAAIAAJ&q=The+History+of+the+Retriangulation+of+Great+Britain ↩
Warner, D.J. (2000-01-01). "From Tallahassee to Timbuktu: Cold War Efforts to Measure Intercontinental Distances". Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences. 30 (2): 393–415. doi:10.2307/27757837. ISSN 0890-9997. JSTOR 27757837. Retrieved 5 August 2023. https://online.ucpress.edu/hsns/article/30/2/393/47570/From-Tallahassee-to-Timbuktu-Cold-War-Efforts-to ↩
Seymour, W. A. (1980). A History of the Ordnance survey. Folkestone: Dawson. ISBN 978-0-7129-0979-2. 978-0-7129-0979-2 ↩
Nalty, B.C. (1997). "Winged Shield, Winged Sword: A History of the United States Air Force" (PDF). Dept. of Defense. Retrieved 5 August 2023. https://media.defense.gov/2010/Nov/05/2001329896/-1/-1/0/AFD-101105-002.pdf ↩
Baker, L.S. (1971). Geodetic Operations in the United States: And in Other Areas Through International Cooperation. U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 5 August 2023. https://books.google.com/books?id=NEg79o-ovZgC ↩