In certain circumstances, examples can suffice as logically valid proof.
In some scenarios, an argument by example may be valid if it leads from a singular premise to an existential conclusion (i.e. proving that a claim is true for at least one case, instead of for all cases). For example:
(or)
These examples outline the informal version of the logical rule known as existential introduction, also known as particularisation or existential generalization:
(where φ ( β / α ) {\displaystyle \varphi (\beta /\alpha )} denotes the formula formed by substituting all free occurrences of the variable α {\displaystyle \alpha } in φ {\displaystyle \varphi } by β {\displaystyle \beta } .)
Likewise, finding a counterexample disproves (proves the negation of) a universal conclusion. This is used in a proof by contradiction.
Main article: Proof by exhaustion
Examples also constitute valid, if inelegant, proof, when it has also been demonstrated that the examples treated cover all possible cases.
In mathematics, proof by example can also be used to refer to attempts to illustrate a claim by proving cases of the claim, with the understanding that these cases contain key ideas which can be generalized into a full-fledged proof.5
"Logical fallacies". www.auburn.edu. Archived from the original on 31 July 2002. https://web.archive.org/web/20020731165349/http://www.auburn.edu/~marchjl/fallacies.htm ↩
"Proof by example – Grammarist". Grammarist. Retrieved 2019-12-01. https://grammarist.com/rhetoric/proof-by-example/ ↩
"What is Proof By Example?". Simplicable. Retrieved 2019-12-01. https://simplicable.com/new/proof-by-example ↩
"Proofs". www.mit.edu. Retrieved 2019-12-01. http://www.mit.edu/people/dmredish/wwwMLRF/links/Humor/Math_Proofs.html ↩