Credible sets are not unique, as any given probability distribution has an infinite number of γ {\displaystyle \gamma } -credible sets, i.e. sets of probability γ {\displaystyle \gamma } . For example, in the univariate case, there are multiple definitions for a suitable interval or set:
One may also define an interval for which the mean is the central point, assuming that the mean exists.
γ {\displaystyle \gamma } -Smallest Credible Sets ( γ {\displaystyle \gamma } -SCS) can easily be generalized to the multivariate case, and are bounded by probability density contour lines.4 They always contain the mode, but not necessarily the mean, the coordinate-wise median, nor the geometric median.
Credible intervals can also be estimated through the use of simulation techniques such as Markov chain Monte Carlo.5
A frequentist 95% confidence interval means that with a large number of repeated samples, 95% of such calculated confidence intervals would include the true value of the parameter. In frequentist terms, the parameter is fixed (cannot be considered to have a distribution of possible values) and the confidence interval is random (as it depends on the random sample).
Bayesian credible intervals differ from frequentist confidence intervals by two major aspects:
For the case of a single parameter and data that can be summarised in a single sufficient statistic, it can be shown that the credible interval and the confidence interval coincide if the unknown parameter is a location parameter (i.e. the forward probability function has the form P r ( x | μ ) = f ( x − μ ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {Pr} (x|\mu )=f(x-\mu )} ), with a prior that is a uniform flat distribution;6 and also if the unknown parameter is a scale parameter (i.e. the forward probability function has the form P r ( x | s ) = f ( x / s ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {Pr} (x|s)=f(x/s)} ), with a Jeffreys' prior P r ( s | I ) ∝ 1 / s {\displaystyle \mathrm {Pr} (s|I)\;\propto \;1/s} 7 — the latter following because taking the logarithm of such a scale parameter turns it into a location parameter with a uniform distribution. But these are distinctly special (albeit important) cases; in general no such equivalence can be made.
Edwards, Ward; Lindman, Harold; Savage, Leonard J. (1963). "Bayesian statistical inference in psychological research". Psychological Review. 70 (3): 193–242. doi:10.1037/h0044139. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Lee, P.M. (1997) Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction, Arnold. ISBN 0-340-67785-6 /wiki/ISBN_(identifier) ↩
VanderPlas, Jake. "Frequentism and Bayesianism III: Confidence, Credibility, and why Frequentism and Science do not Mix | Pythonic Perambulations". jakevdp.github.io. https://jakevdp.github.io/blog/2014/06/12/frequentism-and-bayesianism-3-confidence-credibility/ ↩
O'Hagan, A. (1994) Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol 2B, Bayesian Inference, Section 2.51. Arnold, ISBN 0-340-52922-9 /wiki/ISBN_(identifier) ↩
Chen, Ming-Hui; Shao, Qi-Man (1 March 1999). "Monte Carlo Estimation of Bayesian Credible and HPD Intervals". Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 8 (1): 69–92. doi:10.1080/10618600.1999.10474802. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Jaynes, E. T. (1976). "Confidence Intervals vs Bayesian Intervals", in Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, (W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker, eds.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 175 et seq http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/articles/confidence.pdf ↩