Plants can be subjected to slowly developing water shortages (ie, taking days, weeks, or months), or they may face short-term deficits of water (ie, hours to days). In these situations, plants adapt by responding accordingly, minimizing water loss and maximizing water uptake.13 Plants are more susceptible to drought stress during the reproductive stages of growth, flowering and seed development. Therefore, the combination of short-term plus long-term responses allow for plants to produce a few viable seeds.14 Some examples of short-term and long-term physiological responses include:
In response to drought conditions, there is an alteration of gene expression, induced by or activated by transcription factors (TFs). These TFs bind to specific cis-elements to induce the expression of targeted stress-inducible genes, allowing for products to be transcribed that help with stress response and tolerance.17 Some of these include dehydration-responsive element-binding protein (DREB), ABA-responsive element-binding factor (AREB), no apical meristem (NAM), Arabidopsis transcription activation factor (ATAF), and cup-shaped cotyledon (CUC). Much of the molecular work to understand the regulation of drought tolerance has been done in Arabidopsis, helping elucidate the basic processes below.18
DREB1A, DREB 1B, and DREB 1C are plant specific TFs which bind to drought responsive elements (DREs) in promoters responsive to drought, high salinity and low temperature in Arabidopsis.19 Overexpression of these genes enhance the tolerance of drought, high salinity, and low temperature in transgenic lines from Arabidopsis, rice, and tobacco.20
DEAR1 ("DREB and EAR motif protein 1") is a TF with an entirely different purpose nothing to do with drought stress. Tsutsui et al 2009 found Arabidopsis DEAR1 (At3g50260) to respond to pathogen infection, chitin, and oligomers of chitin.21
DREB proteins are involved in a variety of functions related to drought tolerance. For example, DREB proteins including DREB2A cooperate with AREB/ABF proteins in gene expression, specifically in the DREB2A gene under osmotic stress conditions.22 DREB2 also induces the expression of heat-related genes, such as heat shock protein. Overexpression of DREB2Aca enhances drought and heat stress tolerance levels in Arabidopsis.23
AREB/ABFs are ABA-responsive bZIP-type TFs which bind to ABA-responsive elements (ABREs) in stress-responsive promoters and activate gene expression.24 AREB1, AREB2, ABF3, and ABF1 have important roles in ABA signalling in the vegetative stage, as ABA controls the expression of genes associated with drought response and tolerance. The native form of AREB1 cannot target drought stress genes like RD29B in Arabidopsis, so modification is necessary for transcriptional activation.25 AREB/ABFs are positively regulated by SnRK2s, controlling the activity of target proteins via phosphorylation. This regulation also functions in the control of drought tolerance in the vegetative stage as well as the seed maturation and germination.26
TFs such as NAC (composed of NAM, ATAF, and CUC), are also related to drought response in Arabidopsis and rice.27 Overexpression in the aforementioned plants improves stress and drought tolerance. They also may be related to root growth and senescence, two physiological traits related to drought tolerance.28
Plants in naturally arid conditions retain large amounts of biomass due to drought tolerance and can be classified into 4 categories of adaptation:29
Many adaptations for dry conditions are structural, including the following:30
With the frequency and severity of droughts increasing in recent years, damage to crops has become more serious, lowering the crop yield, growth, and production.3132 However, research into the molecular pathways involving stress tolerance have revealed that overexpression of such genes can enhance drought tolerance, leading to projects focused on the development of transgenic crop varieties.33
Drought-tolerant plants which are developed through biotechnology enable farmers to protect their harvest and reduces losses in times of intense drought by using water more efficiently.
International research projects to improve drought tolerance have been introduced, such as the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).34 One such project from CGIAR involves introducing genes such as DREB1 into lowland rice, upland rice, and wheat to evaluate drought tolerance in fields. This project aims to select at least 10 lines for agricultural use.35 Another similar project in collaboration with CGIAR, Embrapa, RIKEN, and the University of Tokyo have introduced AREB and DREB stress-tolerant genes into soybeans, finding several transgenic soybean lines with drought tolerance. Both projects have found improved grain yield and will be used to help develop future varieties that can be used commercially.36
Other examples of collaborations to improve drought tolerance in crop-variety plants include the International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) in Aleppo, Syria; the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in Andhra Pradesh, India; the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los Baños, Philippines.;37 and the Heat and Drought Wheat Improvement Consortium (HeDWIC),38 a network that facilitates global coordination of wheat research to adapt to a future with more severe weather extremes.
The development of genetically modified crops includes multiple patents for genes and promoters, such as the marker genes in a vector, as well as transformation techniques. Therefore, freedom-to-operate (FTO) surveys should be implemented in collaborations for developing drought tolerant crops.39 Large amounts of money are also needed for the development of genetically modified groups. To bring a new genetically modified crop into the commercial market, it has been estimated to cost USD 136 million over 13 years.40 This poses a problem for development, as only a small number of companies can afford to develop drought-tolerant crops, and it is difficult for research institutions to sustain funding for this period of time.41 Therefore, a multinational framework with more collaboration among multiple disciples is needed to sustain projects of this size.
Plant transformation has been used to develop multiple drought resistant crop varieties, but only limited varieties of ornamental plants.42 This significant lag in development is due to the fact that more transgenic ornamental plants are being developed for other reasons than drought tolerance.43 However, abiotic stress resistance is being explored in ornamental plants by Ornamental Biosciences. Transgenic Petunias, Poinsettias, New Guinea Impatiens, and Geraniums are being evaluated for frost, drought, and disease resistance.44 This will allow for a wider range of environments in which these plants can grow.
This is a list of selected plant families, species and/or genus that tolerate drought:
Ashraf, M. (January 2010). "Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances". Biotechnology Advances. 28 (1): 169–183. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.005. ISSN 1873-1899. PMID 19914371. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
"Biotechnology for the Development of Drought Tolerant Crops - Pocket K | ISAAA.org". www.isaaa.org. Retrieved 2018-11-29. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/32/default.asp ↩
Tardieu, François; Simonneau, Thierry; Muller, Bertrand (2018-04-29). "The Physiological Basis of Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants: A Scenario-Dependent Probabilistic Approach". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 69 (1): 733–759. Bibcode:2018AnRPB..69..733T. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040218. ISSN 1543-5008. PMID 29553801. https://doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev-arplant-042817-040218 ↩
Hu, Honghong; Xiong, Lizhong (2014-04-29). "Genetic Engineering and Breeding of Drought-Resistant Crops". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 65 (1): 715–741. Bibcode:2014AnRPB..65..715H. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040000. ISSN 1543-5008. PMID 24313844. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
Ahmad, Uzair; Alvino, Arturo; Marino, Stefano (2021-10-17). "A Review of Crop Water Stress Assessment Using Remote Sensing". Remote Sensing. 13 (20): 4155. Bibcode:2021RemS...13.4155A. doi:10.3390/rs13204155. ISSN 2072-4292. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Frs13204155 ↩
Varshney, Rajeev K; Tuberosa, Roberto; Tardieu, Francois (2018-06-08). "Progress in understanding drought tolerance: from alleles to cropping systems". Journal of Experimental Botany. 69 (13): 3175–3179. doi:10.1093/jxb/ery187. ISSN 0022-0957. PMC 5991209. PMID 29878257. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5991209 ↩
Shrestha, Asis; Fendel, Alexander; Nguyen, Thuy H.; Adebabay, Anteneh; Kullik, Annika Stina; Benndorf, Jan; Leon, Jens; Naz, Ali A. (2022-10-03). "Natural diversity uncovers P5CS1 regulation and its role in drought stress tolerance and yield sustainability in barley". Plant, Cell & Environment. 45 (12): 3523–3536. Bibcode:2022PCEnv..45.3523S. doi:10.1111/pce.14445. ISSN 0140-7791. PMID 36130879. S2CID 252438394. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fpce.14445 ↩
Muzammil, Shumaila; Shrestha, Asis; Dadshani, Said; Pillen, Klaus; Siddique, Shahid; Léon, Jens; Naz, Ali Ahmad (October 2018). "An Ancestral Allele of Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase1 Promotes Proline Accumulation and Drought Adaptation in Cultivated Barley". Plant Physiology. 178 (2): 771–782. doi:10.1104/pp.18.00169. ISSN 0032-0889. PMC 6181029. PMID 30131422. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181029 ↩
NAKASHIMA, Kazuo; SUENAGA, Kazuhiro (2017). "Toward the Genetic Improvement of Drought Tolerance in Crops". Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly. 51 (1): 1–10. doi:10.6090/jarq.51.1. ISSN 0021-3551. https://doi.org/10.6090%2Fjarq.51.1 ↩
Shrestha, Asis; Cudjoe, Daniel Kingsley; Kamruzzaman, Mohammad; Siddique, Shahid; Fiorani, Fabio; Léon, Jens; Naz, Ali Ahmad (June 2021). "Abscisic acid-responsive element binding transcription factors contribute to proline synthesis and stress adaptation in Arabidopsis". Journal of Plant Physiology. 261: 153414. Bibcode:2021JPPhy.26153414S. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153414. PMID 33895677. S2CID 233397785. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0176161721000535 ↩
Chaves, Manuela M.; Maroco, João P.; Pereira, João S. (2003). "Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant". Functional Plant Biology. 30 (3): 239–264. Bibcode:2003FunPB..30..239C. doi:10.1071/FP02076. PMID 32689007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228748469 ↩
VanWallendael, Acer; Soltani, Ali; Emery, Nathan C.; Peixoto, Murilo M.; Olsen, Jason; Lowry, David B. (2019-04-29). "A Molecular View of Plant Local Adaptation: Incorporating Stress-Response Networks". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 70 (1). Annual Reviews: 559–583. Bibcode:2019AnRPB..70..559V. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100114. ISSN 1543-5008. OSTI 1593759. PMID 30786237. S2CID 73507185. https://doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev-arplant-050718-100114 ↩
"Adaptations of Plants to Arid Environments". landau.faculty.unlv.edu. Retrieved 2018-12-04. http://landau.faculty.unlv.edu//adaptations.htm ↩
"PLANT ADAPTATIONS TO HOT & DRY CONDITIONS (Xeric Adaptations)" (PDF). https://txmn.org/alamo/files/2016/09/XericAdaptations.pdf ↩
Chandler, Stephen F.; Sanchez, Cory (October 2012). "Genetic modification; the development of transgenic ornamental plant varieties". Plant Biotechnology Journal. 10 (8): 891–903. Bibcode:2012PBioJ..10..891C. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00693.x. ISSN 1467-7652. PMID 22537268. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7652.2012.00693.x ↩
"CGIAR: Science for humanity's greatest challenges". CGIAR. Retrieved 2018-12-04. https://www.cgiar.org/ ↩
"HeDWIC". HeDWIC. Retrieved 2019-03-25. http://www.hedwic.org/ ↩
"Selecta Klemm and Mendel Biotechnology Establish Ornamental Bioscience". www.cabi.org. Retrieved 2018-12-04. https://www.cabi.org/agbiotechnet/news/16052 ↩