Richard Dedekind

<h2 id="life">Life</h2>
Dedekind's father was Julius Levin Ulrich Dedekind, an administrator of <a href="/facts/TU_Braunschweig/hgVoUTF9">Collegium Carolinum</a> in <a href="/facts/Braunschweig/qv0TQYzz">Braunschweig</a>. His mother was Caroline Henriette Dedekind (née Emperius), the daughter of a professor at the Collegium.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2">2</a> Richard Dedekind had three older siblings. As an adult, he never used the names Julius Wilhelm. He was born in Braunschweig (often called "Brunswick" in English), which is where he lived most of his life and died. His body rests at <a href="/facts/Braunschweig_Main_Cemetery/PsAcdLQ4">Braunschweig Main Cemetery</a>.
He first attended the Collegium Carolinum in 1848 before transferring to the <a href="/facts/University_of_G%C3%B6ttingen/UTUodvX1">University of Göttingen</a> in 1850. There, Dedekind was taught <a href="/facts/Number_theory/zhoa7zrc">number theory</a> by professor <a href="/facts/Moritz_Stern/uqBPVNCJ">Moritz Stern</a>. <a href="/facts/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss/f4eSMBD7">Gauss</a> was still teaching, although mostly at an elementary level, and Dedekind became his last student. Dedekind received his doctorate in 1852, for a thesis titled Über die Theorie der Eulerschen Integrale ("On the Theory of <a href="/facts/Euler_integral/8L8aNjNF">Eulerian integrals</a>"). This thesis did not display the talent evident in Dedekind's subsequent publications.
At that time, the <a href="/facts/University_of_Berlin/QE2lhhkd">University of Berlin</a>, not <a href="/facts/G%C3%B6ttingen/9KyeWn2X">Göttingen</a>, was the main facility for mathematical research in Germany. Thus Dedekind went to Berlin for two years of study, where he and <a href="/facts/Bernhard_Riemann/oV2fL0k8">Bernhard Riemann</a> were contemporaries; they were both awarded the <a href="/facts/Habilitation/VSEhfx78">habilitation</a> in 1854. Dedekind returned to Göttingen to teach as a <a href="/facts/Privatdozent/Cd6m1pFt">Privatdozent</a>, giving courses on <a href="/facts/Probability/fgYvMhwb">probability</a> and <a href="/facts/Geometry/wTQf5ffQ">geometry</a>. He studied for a while with <a href="/facts/Peter_Gustav_Lejeune_Dirichlet/b5UIU7Uy">Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet</a>, and they became good friends. Because of lingering weaknesses in his mathematical knowledge, he studied <a href="/facts/Elliptic_function/mF03oI04">elliptic</a> and <a href="/facts/Abelian_variety/dGSDVruG">abelian functions</a>. Yet he was also the first at Göttingen to lecture concerning <a href="/facts/Galois_theory/54wscJfj">Galois theory</a>. About this time, he became one of the first people to understand the importance of the notion of <a href="/facts/Group_(mathematics)/IQTYqINt">groups</a> for <a href="/facts/Algebra/nMdqczjo">algebra</a> and <a href="/facts/Arithmetic/hvHwkbMV">arithmetic</a>.
In 1858, he began teaching at the <a href="/facts/ETH_Z%C3%BCrich/IxHAFGUU">Polytechnic</a> school in <a href="/facts/Z%C3%BCrich/dXpgq7df">Zürich</a> (now ETH Zürich). When the Collegium Carolinum was upgraded to a <a href="/facts/Technische_Hochschule/oC7RuQDg">Technische Hochschule</a> (Institute of Technology) in 1862, Dedekind returned to his native Braunschweig, where he spent the rest of his life, teaching at the Institute. He retired in 1894, but did occasional teaching and continued to publish. He never married, instead living with his sister Julia.
Dedekind was elected to the Academies of Berlin (1880) and Rome, and to the <a href="/facts/French_Academy_of_Sciences/zF42DYQv">French Academy of Sciences</a> (1900). He received honorary doctorates from the universities of <a href="/facts/University_of_Oslo/uYPDcgpU">Oslo</a>, <a href="/facts/University_of_Zurich/BXmxTYKh">Zurich</a>, and <a href="/facts/Technical_University_at_Brunswick/hgVoUTF9">Braunschweig</a>.

<h2 id="work">Work</h2>

While teaching calculus for the first time at the <a href="/facts/ETH_Z%C3%BCrich/IxHAFGUU">Polytechnic</a> school, Dedekind developed the notion now known as a <a href="/facts/Dedekind_cut/rqhbb24J">Dedekind cut</a> (German: Schnitt), now a standard definition of the real numbers. The idea of a cut is that an <a href="/facts/Irrational_number/Psv19TET">irrational number</a> divides the <a href="/facts/Rational_number/VJQmyY05">rational numbers</a> into two classes (<a href="/facts/Set_(mathematics)/BfucfHMq">sets</a>), with all the numbers of one class (greater) being strictly greater than all the numbers of the other (lesser) class. For example, the <a href="/facts/Square_root_of_2/SD0sag94">square root of 2</a> defines all the nonnegative numbers whose squares are less than 2 and the negative numbers into the lesser class, and the positive numbers whose squares are greater than 2 into the greater class. Every location on the number line continuum contains either a rational or an irrational number. Thus there are no empty locations, gaps, or discontinuities. Dedekind published his thoughts on irrational numbers and Dedekind cuts in his pamphlet "Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen" ("Continuity and irrational numbers");<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3">3</a> in modern terminology, Vollständigkeit, <a href="/facts/Complete_space/lsckmU8G">completeness</a>.
Dedekind defined two sets to be "similar" when there exists a <a href="/facts/One-to-one_correspondence/j4gTuTmW">one-to-one correspondence</a> between them.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4">4</a> He invoked similarity to give the first<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5">5</a> precise definition of an <a href="/facts/Dedekind-infinite_set/a4R2LYea">infinite set</a>: a set is infinite when it is "similar to a proper part of itself,"<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6">6</a> in modern terminology, is <a href="/facts/Equinumerous/7hMvasXx">equinumerous</a> to one of its <a href="/facts/Subset/SJGERmbA">proper subsets</a>. Thus the set N of <a href="/facts/Natural_number/u65og8JE">natural numbers</a> can be shown to be similar to the subset of N whose members are the <a href="/facts/Square_(algebra)/Jzpq0R0z">squares</a> of every member of N, (N → N2):

N    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 ...
            ↓          
N2   1  4  9 16 25 36 49 64 81 100 ...

Dedekind's work in this area anticipated that of <a href="/facts/Georg_Cantor/k5v1DvW4">Georg Cantor</a>, who is commonly considered the founder of <a href="/facts/Set_theory/1ptfsvUP">set theory</a>. Likewise, his contributions to the <a href="/facts/Foundations_of_mathematics/yjpbbUkt">foundations of mathematics</a> anticipated later works by major proponents of <a href="/facts/Logicism/YvHs6X3E">logicism</a>, such as <a href="/facts/Gottlob_Frege/FXyStVYj">Gottlob Frege</a> and <a href="/facts/Bertrand_Russell/SRpwNX2U">Bertrand Russell</a>.
Dedekind edited the collected works of <a href="/facts/Peter_Gustav_Lejeune_Dirichlet/b5UIU7Uy">Lejeune Dirichlet</a>, <a href="/facts/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss/f4eSMBD7">Gauss</a>, and <a href="/facts/Bernhard_Riemann/oV2fL0k8">Riemann</a>. Dedekind's study of Lejeune Dirichlet's work led him to his later study of <a href="/facts/Algebraic_number_field/e0K0TXSh">algebraic number fields</a> and <a href="/facts/Ideal_(ring_theory)/vCvytduX">ideals</a>. In 1863, he published Lejeune Dirichlet's lectures on <a href="/facts/Number_theory/zhoa7zrc">number theory</a> as <a href="/facts/Vorlesungen_%C3%BCber_Zahlentheorie/2lcqU0LM">Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie</a> ("Lectures on Number Theory") about which it has been written that:

Although the book is assuredly based on Dirichlet's lectures, and although Dedekind himself referred to the book throughout his life as Dirichlet's, the book itself was entirely written by Dedekind, for the most part after Dirichlet's death.— Edwards, 1983
The 1879 and 1894 editions of the Vorlesungen included supplements introducing the notion of an ideal, fundamental to <a href="/facts/Ring_(algebra)/JnCUXz63">ring theory</a>. (The word "Ring", introduced later by <a href="/facts/David_Hilbert/1vhlHn4b">Hilbert</a>, does not appear in Dedekind's work.) Dedekind defined an <a href="/facts/Ring_ideal/vCvytduX">ideal</a> as a subset of a set of numbers, composed of <a href="/facts/Algebraic_integer/Qb0fD3R3">algebraic integers</a> that satisfy polynomial equations with <a href="/facts/Integer/PUwwrawx">integer</a> coefficients. The concept underwent further development in the hands of Hilbert and, especially, of <a href="/facts/Emmy_Noether/agcYrVLt">Emmy Noether</a>. Ideals generalize <a href="/facts/Ernst_Eduard_Kummer/dGnaTQyG">Ernst Eduard Kummer</a>'s <a href="/facts/Ideal_number/YumfGWcT">ideal numbers</a>, devised as part of Kummer's 1843 attempt to prove <a href="/facts/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem/fHRc2t8z">Fermat's Last Theorem</a>. (Thus Dedekind can be said to have been Kummer's most important disciple.) In an 1882 article, Dedekind and <a href="/facts/Heinrich_Martin_Weber/3gjJ6n23">Heinrich Martin Weber</a> applied ideals to <a href="/facts/Riemann_surface/qoj8ogv8">Riemann surfaces</a>, giving an algebraic proof of the <a href="/facts/Riemann%E2%80%93Roch_theorem/TRaNyUQA">Riemann–Roch theorem</a>.
In 1888, he published a short monograph titled Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? ("What are numbers and what are they good for?" Ewald 1996: 790),<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7">7</a> which included his definition of an <a href="/facts/Infinite_set/9rTN0xGH">infinite set</a>. He also proposed an <a href="/facts/Axiom/mLjP14Mc">axiomatic</a> foundation for the natural numbers, whose primitive notions were the number <a href="/facts/1_(number)/m3wpSfMf">one</a> and the <a href="/facts/Successor_function/R1hhkSEG">successor function</a>. The next year, <a href="/facts/Giuseppe_Peano/VT2Wsmu7">Giuseppe Peano</a>, citing Dedekind, formulated an equivalent but simpler <a href="/facts/Peano_axioms/DhhDnNug">set of axioms</a>, now the standard ones.
Dedekind made other contributions to <a href="/facts/Abstract_algebra/YNNE1CNz">algebra</a>. For instance, around 1900, he wrote the first papers on <a href="/facts/Modular_lattice/CLe2aDq7">modular lattices</a>. In 1872, while on holiday in <a href="/facts/Interlaken/UTKrcQd8">Interlaken</a>, Dedekind met <a href="/facts/Georg_Cantor/k5v1DvW4">Georg Cantor</a>. Thus began an enduring relationship of mutual respect, and Dedekind became one of the first mathematicians to admire Cantor's work concerning infinite sets, proving a valued ally in Cantor's disputes with <a href="/facts/Leopold_Kronecker/T0lMQofb">Leopold Kronecker</a>, who was philosophically opposed to Cantor's <a href="/facts/Transfinite_numbers/m2oTjXaj">transfinite numbers</a>.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8">8</a>

<h2 id="bibliography">Bibliography</h2>
Primary literature in English:

<ul><li>1890. "Letter to Keferstein" in <a href="/facts/Jean_van_Heijenoort/sbemFx47">Jean van Heijenoort</a>, 1967. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Harvard Univ. Press: 98–103.</li>
<li>1963 (1901). Essays on the Theory of Numbers. Beman, W. W., ed. and trans. Dover. Contains English translations of <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20051031071536/http://www.ru.nl/w-en-s/gmfw/bronnen/dedekind2.html">Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen</a> and Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?</li>
<li>1996. Theory of Algebraic Integers. <a href="/facts/John_Stillwell/SWSzmgXG">Stillwell, John</a>, ed. and trans. Cambridge Uni. Press. A translation of Über die Theorie der ganzen algebraischen Zahlen.</li>
<li>Ewald, William B., ed., 1996. From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols. Oxford Uni. Press.
<ul><li>1854. "On the introduction of new functions in mathematics," 754–61.</li>
<li>1872. "Continuity and irrational numbers," 765–78. (translation of Stetigkeit...)</li>
<li>1888. What are numbers and what should they be?, 787–832. (translation of Was sind und...)</li>
<li>1872–82, 1899. Correspondence with Cantor, 843–77, 930–40.</li></ul></li></ul>
Primary literature in German:

<ul><li><a href="https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN235685380">Gesammelte mathematische Werke</a> (Complete mathematical works, Vol. 1–3).<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:9" href="#fn:9">9</a> Retrieved 5 August 2009.</li></ul>
<h2 id="pronunciation">Pronunciation</h2>
dehdehkhind is the way a German would pronounce Dedekind. 

<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/List_of_things_named_after_Richard_Dedekind/tCmh6LAr">List of things named after Richard Dedekind</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_cut/rqhbb24J">Dedekind cut</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_domain/tAsvAcaW">Dedekind domain</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_eta_function/nStBqqmo">Dedekind eta function</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind-infinite_set/a4R2LYea">Dedekind-infinite set</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_number/vnzw9GrY">Dedekind number</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_psi_function/tnyuoSrs">Dedekind psi function</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_sum/a56r07Vx">Dedekind sum</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Dedekind_zeta_function/Nj8PwFo8">Dedekind zeta function</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Ideal_(ring_theory)/vCvytduX">Ideal (ring theory)</a></li></ul>
<h2 id="notes">Notes</h2>

<ul><li>Biermann, Kurt-R (2008). "Dedekind, (Julius Wilhelm) Richard". <a href="/facts/Dictionary_of_Scientific_Biography/qMA96GhQ">Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography</a>. Vol. 4. Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 1–5. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-0-684-31559-1.</li></ul>
<h2 id="further-reading">Further reading</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Harold_Edwards_(mathematician)/JKfNgfJB">Edwards, H. M.</a>, 1983, "Dedekind's invention of ideals," Bull. London Math. Soc. 15: 8–17.</li>
<li><a href="/facts/William_Everdell/WnGRjnUe">William Everdell</a> (1998). <a href="https://archive.org/details/firstmodernsprof00ever">The First Moderns</a>. Chicago: <a href="/facts/University_of_Chicago_Press/6se0Ezfb">University of Chicago Press</a>. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-226-22480-5.</li>
<li>Gillies, Douglas A., 1982. Frege, Dedekind, and Peano on the foundations of arithmetic. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.</li>
<li>Ferreirós, José, 2007. Labyrinth of Thought: A history of set theory and its role in modern mathematics. Basel: Birkhäuser, chap. 3, 4 and 7.</li>
<li><a href="/facts/Ivor_Grattan-Guinness/j8LPQtrS">Ivor Grattan-Guinness</a>, 2000. The Search for Mathematical Roots 1870–1940. Princeton Uni. Press.</li></ul>
There is an <a href="http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/References/Dedekind.html">online bibliography</a> of the secondary literature on Dedekind. Also consult Stillwell's "Introduction" to Dedekind (1996).

<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>

Wikiquote has quotations related to Richard Dedekind.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Richard Dedekind.

<ul><li>O'Connor, John J.; <a href="/facts/Edmund_F._Robertson/jQMcnY79">Robertson, Edmund F.</a>, <a href="https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Dedekind.html">"Richard Dedekind"</a>, <a href="/facts/MacTutor_History_of_Mathematics_Archive/xtwLmN5q">MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive</a>, <a href="/facts/University_of_St_Andrews/IwXjmljw">University of St Andrews</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/9673">Works by Richard Dedekind</a> at <a href="/facts/Project_Gutenberg/2l0R6GgQ">Project Gutenberg</a></li>
<li><a href="https://archive.org/search.php?query=%28%28subject%3A%22Dedekind%2C%20Richard%22%20OR%20subject%3A%22Richard%20Dedekind%22%20OR%20creator%3A%22Dedekind%2C%20Richard%22%20OR%20creator%3A%22Richard%20Dedekind%22%20OR%20creator%3A%22Dedekind%2C%20R%2E%22%20OR%20title%3A%22Richard%20Dedekind%22%20OR%20description%3A%22Dedekind%2C%20Richard%22%20OR%20description%3A%22Richard%20Dedekind%22%29%20OR%20%28%221831-1916%22%20AND%20Dedekind%29%29%20AND%20%28-mediatype:software%29">Works by or about Richard Dedekind</a> at the <a href="/facts/Internet_Archive/PHStU8Lo">Internet Archive</a></li>
<li><a href="https://archive.org/details/essaysintheoryof00dedeuoft">Dedekind, Richard, Essays on the Theory of Numbers. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago, 1901.</a> at the <a href="/facts/Internet_Archive/PHStU8Lo">Internet Archive</a></li>
<li>Dedekind's Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dedekind-foundations/">http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dedekind-foundations/</a>.</li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1">"Dedekind". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary. <a href="http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dedekind" target="_blank">http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dedekind</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:2">James, Ioan (2002). Remarkable Mathematicians. Cambridge University Press. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-521-52094-2. <a href="978-0-521-52094-2" target="_blank">978-0-521-52094-2</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:3">Ewald, William B., ed. (1996) "Continuity and irrational numbers", p. 766 in From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols. Oxford University Press. full text <a href="http://www.math.ru.nl/werkgroepen/gmfw/bronnen/dedekind2.html" target="_blank">http://www.math.ru.nl/werkgroepen/gmfw/bronnen/dedekind2.html</a> <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:4">"The Nature and Meaning of Numbers". Essays on the Theory of Numbers. Dover. 1963 [1901]. Part III, Paragraph 32 – via Google Books –. 1901 edition, published by Open Court Publishing Company, translated by Wooster Woodruff Beman. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=NbCSof2ceVQC&pg=PA29" target="_blank">https://books.google.com/books?id=NbCSof2ceVQC&pg=PA29</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:5">Moore, G.H. (17 November 1982). Zermelo's Axiom of Choice. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-90670-6. <a href="978-0-387-90670-6" target="_blank">978-0-387-90670-6</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:6">"The Nature and Meaning of Numbers". Essays on the Theory of Numbers. Dover. 1963 [1901]. Part V, Paragraph 64 – via Google Books –. 1901 edition, published by Open Court Publishing Company, translated by Wooster Woodruff Beman. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=NbCSof2ceVQC&pg=PA29" target="_blank">https://books.google.com/books?id=NbCSof2ceVQC&pg=PA29</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:7">Richard Dedekind (1888). Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?. Braunschweig: Vieweg. Online available at: MPIWG GDZ UBS <a href="http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView?pn=1&url=%2Fmpiwg%2Fonline%2Fpermanent%2Feinstein_exhibition%2Fsources%2F8GPV80UY%2Fpageimg&viewMode=images&tocMode=thumbs&tocPN=1&searchPN=1&mode=imagepath&characterNormalization=reg&queryPageSize=10" target="_blank">http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView?pn=1&url=%2Fmpiwg%2Fonline%2Fpermanent%2Feinstein_exhibition%2Fsources%2F8GPV80UY%2Fpageimg&viewMode=images&tocMode=thumbs&tocPN=1&searchPN=1&mode=imagepath&characterNormalization=reg&queryPageSize=10</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:8">Aczel, Amir D. (2001), The Mystery of the Aleph: Mathematics, the Kabbalah, and the Search for Infinity, Pocket Books nonfiction, Simon and Schuster, p. 102, ISBN 9780743422994. <a href="9780743422994" target="_blank">9780743422994</a> <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:9">Bell, E. T. (1933). "Book Review: Richard Dedekind. Gesammelte mathematische Werke". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 39: 16–17. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1933-05535-0. <a href="/wiki/Eric_Temple_Bell" target="_blank">/wiki/Eric_Temple_Bell</a> <a href="#fnref:9" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
</ol>

Richard Dedekind open-in-new

Richard Dedekind