Dispatchable plants have varying startup times, depending on the technology used and time elapsed after the previous operation. For example, "hot startup" can be performed a few hours after a preceding shutdown, while "cold startup" is performed after a few days of inoperation.
The fastest plants to dispatch are grid batteries which can dispatch in milliseconds. Hydroelectric power plants can often dispatch in tens of seconds to minutes, and natural gas power plants can generally dispatch in tens of minutes.
For example, the 1,728 MW Dinorwig pumped storage power plant can reach full output in 16 seconds,4 while the 410.9 MW simple-cycle gas turbine at Lincoln Combustion Turbine Station takes 10 minutes to start up and reach full output.5
Gas turbine (Brayton cycle) thermal plants require around 15-30 minutes to startup. Coal thermal plants based on steam turbines (Rankine cycle) are dispatchable sources that require hours to startup.
The combined cycle power plants consist of few stages with varying startup times with more than 8 hours required to get to full power from cold state:6
Nuclear power plants have the longest startup times of few days for the cold startup (less than a week). A typical boiling water reactor goes through the following stages:7
The primary benefits of dispatchable power plants include:8
These capabilities of dispatchable generators allow:
A 2018 study suggested a new classification of energy generation sources, which accounts for fast increase in penetration of variable renewable energy sources, which result in high energy prices during periods of low availability:9
Cooper, Duncan (22 March 2012). "Johnson's Energy Club Competes in Renewable Energy Case Competition". Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management. Archived from the original on 16 June 2012. Retrieved 29 August 2012. Most conventional energy sources are dispatchable, meaning that they can be turned on or off according to the demand for electricity. The amount of electricity they produce can also be turned up or down so that supply of electricity matches the amount demanded by users. https://web.archive.org/web/20120616055400/http://www.johnson.cornell.edu/Center-for-Sustainable-Global-Enterprise/News-Events/CSGE-Student-Article-Detail/ArticleId/1791/Johnson-s-Energy-Club-Competes-in-Renewable-Energy-Case-Competition.aspx ↩
Electricity Grid: Key Terms and Definitions http://www.visionofearth.org/industry/electricity-grid-key-terms-and-definitions/ ↩
Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future https://books.google.com/books?id=MZ3DklIQuT0C&dq=dispatchable+otec&pg=PA860 ↩
"Welcome to First Hydro" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-01-08. https://web.archive.org/web/20160303171843/http://www.iprplc-gdfsuez.com/~/media/Files/I/IPR-Plc/Attachments/presentations-pdfs/2009/hydro_09.pdf ↩
Weinstein, Michael. "The world's most powerful natural gas power plant, by the numbers". Duke Energy | Illumination. Retrieved 2025-03-04. https://illumination.duke-energy.com/articles/the-world-s-most-powerful-natural-gas-power-plant-by-the-numbers ↩
Ivanova, Sauhats & Linkevics 2016, p. 2. - Ivanova, Polina; Sauhats, Antans; Linkevics, Olegs (2016). Towards optimization of combined cycle power plants' start-ups and shut-down. IEEE. doi:10.1109/RTUCON.2016.7763081. ISBN 978-1-5090-3731-5. https://doi.org/10.1109%2FRTUCON.2016.7763081 ↩
Li 2021, p. 23. - Li, Yifei (2021). Characterization of the reaction time of different power plants (PDF) (M.Sc. thesis). Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-haw/files/2264/I000841954Thesis.pdf ↩
How can renewables deliver dispatchable power on demand? http://www.visionofearth.org/industry/renewable-energy/renewable-energy-review/how-can-renewables-deliver-dispatchable-power-on-demand/ ↩
Sepulveda, Nestor A.; Jenkins, Jesse D.; De Sisternes, Fernando J.; Lester, Richard K. (2018-11-21). "The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation". Joule. 2 (11): 2403–2420. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006. ISSN 2542-4351. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.joule.2018.08.006 ↩