Urinary diversion

<h2 id="types">Types</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Nephrostomy/I17JlXWW">Nephrostomy</a> from the <a href="/facts/Renal_pelvis/nMo9ooBH">renal pelvis</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Urostomy/kLC5mHeK">Urostomy</a> from more distal origins along the urinary tract, with subtypes including:
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Ileal_conduit_urinary_diversion/X3GvHFG4">Ileal conduit urinary diversion</a> (Bricker conduit)</li>
<li><a href="/facts/Indiana_pouch/c5j33JlG">Indiana pouch</a></li></ul></li>
<li>Neobladder to urethra diversion</li></ul>
<h2 id="ureteroenteric-anastomosis">Ureteroenteric anastomosis</h2>
<p>A common feature of the three first, and most common, types of urinary diversion is the ureteroenteric anastomosis. This is the joining site of the <a href="/facts/Ureters/VIfEGI2c">ureters</a> and the section of intestine used for the diversion.
</p><p>The ureteroenteric anastomosis can be created in a number of different ways. There is the option of a refluxing or a non-refluxing type, and the two ureters can be joined into the intestinal segment either together or separately. The non-refluxing type has been associated with higher incidence of ureteroenteric anastomosis stricture, and there is doubt whether it has any advantages over the refluxing type. Therefore, many surgeons prefer the refluxing type which is simpler and apparently carries a lesser degree of complications.
</p><p>Refluxing techniques include the Wallace and Wallace II and the <a href="/facts/Bricker_end-to-side_anastomosis/3lFTufrK">Bricker end-to-side anastomosis</a>. Non-refluxing techniques includes the Le Duc technique.
</p>
<h2 id="complications">Complications</h2>
<p>Complications include <a href="/facts/Incisional_hernia/emQuKl0K">incisional hernia</a>, neobladder-intestinal and neobladder-cutaneous <a href="/facts/Fistula/xlRcRGCJ">fistulas</a>, ureteroenteric anastomosis stricture, neobladder rupture and mucous formation. Ureteral diversion can lead to <a href="/facts/Normal_anion_gap_acidosis/B017Psda">normal anion gap acidosis</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Surgical_anastomosis/3lFTufrK">Surgical anastomosis</a></li></ul>

<ul><li>Hautmann R (2003). "Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder". <i>J Urol</i>. 169 (3): 834–42. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1097%2F01.ju.0000029010.97686.eb">10.1097/01.ju.0000029010.97686.eb</a>. <a href="/facts/PMID_(identifier)/JlHAvMHt">PMID</a> <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12576795">12576795</a>.</li>
<li>Macaluso JN Jr (Apr 1993). "External urinary diversion: pathologic circumstances and available technology". <i>J Endourol</i>. 7 (2): 131–6. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fend.1993.7.131">10.1089/end.1993.7.131</a>. <a href="/facts/PMID_(identifier)/JlHAvMHt">PMID</a> <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8518825">8518825</a>.</li></ul>
<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>
<ul><li><a href="http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3083.htm">eMedicine: Urinary Diversions and Neobladders</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1"><p>Lenis, Andrew T.; Lec, Patrick M.; Chamie, Karim (2020-12-01). "Urinary Diversion". JAMA. 324 (21): 2222. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.17604. ISSN 0098-7484. <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2773564" target="_blank">https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2773564</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:2"><p>Ärzteblatt, Deutscher Ärzteverlag GmbH, Redaktion Deutsches. "Urinary Diversion (21.09.2012)". Deutsches Ärzteblatt. Retrieved 2024-12-04.{{cite web}}:  CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) <a href="https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article/130288" target="_blank">https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article/130288</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
</ol>

Urinary diversion open-in-new

Urinary diversion