After hits are identified from a high throughput screen, the hits are confirmed and evaluated using the following methods:
Following hit confirmation, several compound clusters will be chosen according to their characteristics in the previously defined tests. An Ideal compound cluster will contain members that possess:
The project team will usually select between three and six compound series to be further explored. The next step will allow the testing of analogous compounds to determine a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). Analogs can be quickly selected from an internal library or purchased from commercially available sources ("SAR by catalog" or "SAR by purchase"). Medicinal chemists will also start synthesizing related compounds using different methods such as combinatorial chemistry, high-throughput chemistry, or more classical organic chemistry synthesis.
The objective of this drug discovery phase is to synthesize lead compounds, new analogs with improved potency, reduced off-target activities, and physiochemical/metabolic properties suggestive of reasonable in vivo pharmacokinetics.78 This optimization is accomplished through chemical modification of the hit structure, with modifications chosen by employing knowledge of the structure–activity relationship (SAR) as well as structure-based design if structural information about the target is available.
Lead optimization is concerned with experimental testing and confirmation of the compound based on animal efficacy models and ADMET (in vitro and in situ) tools that may be followed by target identification and target validation.
For educational purposes the European Federation for Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology (EFMC) shared a series of webinars including 'Best Practices for Hit Finding' as well as 'Hit Generation Case Studies'.9
Deprez-Poulain R, Deprez B (2004). "Facts, figures and trends in lead generation". Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 4 (6): 569–80. doi:10.2174/1568026043451168. PMID 14965294. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Fruber M, Narjes F, Steele J (2013). "Lead Generation". In Davis A, Ward SE (eds.). Handbook of Medicinal Chemistry: Principles and Practice. RSC Books. pp. 505–528. ISBN 978-1849736251. 978-1849736251 ↩
Keseru GM, Makara GM (Aug 2006). "Hit discovery and hit-to-lead approaches". Drug Discovery Today. 11 (15–16): 741–8. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.06.016. PMID 16846802. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Bleicher KH, Böhm HJ, Müller K, Alanine AI (May 2003). "Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening". Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 2 (5): 369–78. doi:10.1038/nrd1086. PMID 12750740. S2CID 4859609. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Ezekiel J. Emanuel. "The Solution to Drug Prices". New York Times. On average, only one in every 5,000 compounds that drug companies discover and put through preclinical testing becomes an approved drug. Of the drugs started in clinical trials on humans, only 10 percent secure F.D.A. approval. ... /wiki/Ezekiel_J._Emanuel ↩
Cockbain J (2007). "Intellectual property rights and patents". In Triggle JB, Taylor DJ (ed.). Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 779–815. doi:10.1016/B0-08-045044-X/00031-6. ISBN 978-0-08-045044-5. 978-0-08-045044-5 ↩
Beckers, Maximilian; Fechner, Nikolas; Stiefl, Nikolaus (2022-12-12). "25 Years of Small-Molecule Optimization at Novartis: A Retrospective Analysis of Chemical Series Evolution". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 62 (23): 6002–6021. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00785. ISSN 1549-9596. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00785 ↩
Brown, Dean G. (2023-06-08). "An Analysis of Successful Hit-to-Clinical Candidate Pairs". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 66 (11): 7101–7139. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00521. ISSN 0022-2623. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00521 ↩
"Hit Generation". https://www.efmc.info/hit-generation ↩