Research has demonstrated that certain learning methods are more effective than others and that explicitly teaching study skills can benefit students.12 Study software addresses this by guiding learners toward effective study practices without requiring in-depth knowledge of cognitive science.
Historically, two of the most widely used types of study software are mind-mapping programs and flashcard applications.3 Mind-mapping software is particularly useful for organizing and structuring information but has limited utility once the material is well-structured. Flashcard software, on the other hand, is effective for memorization and recall, although it is sometimes criticized for encouraging rote learning.
Hybrid study tools combining elements of both approaches also exist, including programs that allow students to test their knowledge using their own notes.
Study software offers several advantages, including:
Barriers to the use of study software include:
"IRIS | Page 2: Importance of Teaching Study Skills Strategies". iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu. Retrieved 2025-03-14. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/ef1/cresource/q1/p02/ ↩
"Spaced repetition and the 2357 method". Birmingham City University. Archived from the original on 2025-03-14. Retrieved 2025-03-14. https://archive.today/20250314164624/https://www.bcu.ac.uk/exams-and-revision/best-ways-to-revise/spaced-repetition ↩
Shi, Yi-shan; Tsai, Chih-yung (2024-05-03). "Fostering vocabulary learning: mind mapping app enhances performances of EFL learners". Computer Assisted Language Learning. 37 (4): 634–686. doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2052905. ISSN 0958-8221. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Conradty, Cathérine; Bogner, Franz X. (September 2016). "Hypertext or Textbook: Effects on Motivation and Gain in Knowledge". Education Sciences. 6 (3): 29. doi:10.3390/educsci6030029. ISSN 2227-7102. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Feducsci6030029 ↩
Yaseen, Husam; Mohammad, Abdelaziz Saleh (January 2025). "The Impact of Adaptive Learning Technologies, Personalized Feedback, and Interactive AI Tools on Student Engagement: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy". Sustainability. 17 (3): 1133. doi:10.3390/su17031133. ISSN 2071-1050. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fsu17031133 ↩
Gerlich, Michael (January 2025). "AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking". Societies. 15 (1): 6. doi:10.3390/soc15010006. ISSN 2075-4698. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fsoc15010006 ↩