Fundamentally, the ESE drum-rotor configuration typically consists of four concentric open-ended drums or shells:
In the ESE design, the rotating blades are primarily in radial compression as opposed to radial tension, which means that materials that do not possess high-tensile strength, such as ceramic materials, can be used for their construction. Ceramics behave well in compressive loading situations where brittle fracture is minimized, and would provide greater operating efficiency through higher operating temperatures and lighter engine weight when compared to the metal alloys that typically are used in turbomachinery components. The ESE design and the use of composite materials could also reduce the part count, reduce or eliminate cooling, and result in increased component life.3 The use of ceramics would also be a beneficial feature for hypersonic propulsion systems, where high stagnation temperatures can exceed the limits of traditional turbomachinery materials.
The cavity within the inner shell could be exploited in several different ways. In subsonic applications, venting the centre cavity with a free-stream flow could potentially contribute to a large noise reduction; while in supersonic-hypersonic applications it might be used to house a ramjet or scramjet (or other devices such as a pulse detonation engine) as part of a turbine-based combined-cycle engine. Such an arrangement could reduce the overall length of the propulsion system and thereby reduce weight and drag significantly.4
From Chamis and Blankson:5
One of the major challenges is in bearing design as there are no known lubricated systems that can handle the magnitude of velocity encountered in the ESE; foil- and magnetic bearings have been suggested as possible solutions to this problem.
Although both bearing systems theoretically meet the requirements of the exoskeletal application, neither technology is currently ready for operation at practical sizes. Developments in foil bearing technology indicate it may take 20 years to achieve foil bearings for this diameter, and magnetic bearings appear to be too heavy for this application and would also face a lengthy technology development programme.7
Chamis, Christos C. and Isaiah M. Blankson."Exo-Skeletal Engine – Novel Engine Concept". NASA, 2006. Retrieved: 5 May 2019 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040040170.pdf ↩
Roche, Joseph M., Donald T. Palac, James E. Hunter, David E. Myers, and Christopher A. Snyder. "Investigation of Exoskeletal Engine Propulsion System Concept". NASA, 2005. Retrieved: 31 August 2009 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050215690_2005218705.pdf ↩