Differential association

<h2 id="sutherlands-theory-of-differential-association">Sutherland's theory of differential association</h2>
<p>The principles of Sutherland's Theory of Differential Association key points:<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:1" href="#fn:1"><sup>1</sup></a>
</p><p>1. Criminal behavior is learned from other individuals.
</p><p>2. Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons in a process of communication.
</p><p>3. The principle part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups.
</p><p>4. When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes (a) techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very complicated, sometimes simple; (b) the specific direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes.
</p><p>5. The specific direction of motives and drives is learned from definitions of the legal codes as favorable or unfavorable.
</p><p>6. A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of law over definitions unfavorable to violation of the law.
</p><p>7. Differential associations may vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity.
</p><p>8. The process of learning criminal behavior by association with criminal and anti-criminal patterns involves all of the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning.
</p><p>9. While criminal behavior is an expression of general needs and values, it is not explained by those needs and values, since non-criminal behavior is an expression of the same needs and values.
</p>
<h2 id="explanation">Explanation</h2>
<p>An important quality of differential association theory concerns the frequency and intensity of interaction. The amount of time that a person is exposed to a particular definition and at what point the interaction began are both crucial for explaining criminal activity. The process of learning criminal behaviour is really not any different from the process involved in learning any other type of behaviour. Sutherland maintains that there is no unique learning process associated with acquiring non-normative ways of behaving.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a>
</p><p>One unique aspect of this theory is that the theory purports to explain more than just juvenile delinquency and crime committed by lower-class individuals. Since crime is understood to be learned behaviour, the theory is also applicable to white-collar, corporate, and organized crime.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a>
</p>
<h2 id="critique">Critique</h2>
<p>One criticism leveled against this theory has to do with the idea that people can be independent, rational actors and individually motivated. This notion of one being a criminal based on their environment is problematic. This theory does not take into account personality traits that might affect a person's susceptibility to these environmental influences.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a>
</p>
<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Tabula_Rasa/esxlgDCh">Tabula Rasa</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1"><p>Scarpitti, F. R., A. L. Nielsen, and J. M. Miller. 2009. "A Sociological Theory of Criminal Behavior." Pp. 211 in Crime and Criminals Contemporary and Classic Readings in Criminology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. <a href="/wiki/Oxford_University_Press" target="_blank">/wiki/Oxford_University_Press</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:2"><p>Crime in Canadian Context: Debates and Controversies by William O' Grady (2nd edition) <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:3"><p>Crime in Canadian Context: Debates and Controversies by William O' Grady (2nd edition) <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:4"><p>Crime in Canadian Context: Debates and Controversies by William O' Grady (2nd edition) <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
</ol>

Differential association open-in-new

Differential association