Two difference sets D 1 {\displaystyle D_{1}} in group G 1 {\displaystyle G_{1}} and D 2 {\displaystyle D_{2}} in group G 2 {\displaystyle G_{2}} are equivalent if there is a group isomorphism ψ {\displaystyle \psi } between G 1 {\displaystyle G_{1}} and G 2 {\displaystyle G_{2}} such that D 1 ψ = { d ψ : d ∈ D 1 } = g D 2 {\displaystyle D_{1}^{\psi }=\{d^{\psi }\colon d\in D_{1}\}=gD_{2}} for some g ∈ G 2 . {\displaystyle g\in G_{2}.} The two difference sets are isomorphic if the designs d e v ( D 1 ) {\displaystyle dev(D_{1})} and d e v ( D 2 ) {\displaystyle dev(D_{2})} are isomorphic as block designs.
Equivalent difference sets are isomorphic, but there exist examples of isomorphic difference sets which are not equivalent. In the cyclic difference set case, all known isomorphic difference sets are equivalent.6
A multiplier of a difference set D {\displaystyle D} in group G {\displaystyle G} is a group automorphism ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } of G {\displaystyle G} such that D ϕ = g D {\displaystyle D^{\phi }=gD} for some g ∈ G . {\displaystyle g\in G.} If G {\displaystyle G} is abelian and ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } is the automorphism that maps h ↦ h t {\displaystyle h\mapsto h^{t}} , then t {\displaystyle t} is called a numerical or Hall multiplier.7
It has been conjectured that if p is a prime dividing k − λ {\displaystyle k-\lambda } and not dividing v, then the group automorphism defined by g ↦ g p {\displaystyle g\mapsto g^{p}} fixes some translate of D (this is equivalent to being a multiplier). It is known to be true for p > λ {\displaystyle p>\lambda } when G {\displaystyle G} is an abelian group, and this is known as the First Multiplier Theorem. A more general known result, the Second Multiplier Theorem, says that if D {\displaystyle D} is a ( v , k , λ ) {\displaystyle (v,k,\lambda )} -difference set in an abelian group G {\displaystyle G} of exponent v ∗ {\displaystyle v^{*}} (the least common multiple of the orders of every element), let t {\displaystyle t} be an integer coprime to v {\displaystyle v} . If there exists a divisor m > λ {\displaystyle m>\lambda } of k − λ {\displaystyle k-\lambda } such that for every prime p dividing m, there exists an integer i with t ≡ p i ( mod v ∗ ) {\displaystyle t\equiv p^{i}\ {\pmod {v^{*}}}} , then t is a numerical divisor.8
For example, 2 is a multiplier of the (7,3,1)-difference set mentioned above.
It has been mentioned that a numerical multiplier of a difference set D {\displaystyle D} in an abelian group G {\displaystyle G} fixes a translate of D {\displaystyle D} , but it can also be shown that there is a translate of D {\displaystyle D} which is fixed by all numerical multipliers of D . {\displaystyle D.} 9
The known difference sets or their complements have one of the following parameter sets:10
In many constructions of difference sets, the groups that are used are related to the additive and multiplicative groups of finite fields. The notation used to denote these fields differs according to discipline. In this section, G F ( q ) {\displaystyle {\rm {GF}}(q)} is the Galois field of order q , {\displaystyle q,} where q {\displaystyle q} is a prime or prime power. The group under addition is denoted by G = ( G F ( q ) , + ) {\displaystyle G=({\rm {GF}}(q),+)} , while G F ( q ) ∗ {\displaystyle {\rm {GF}}(q)^{*}} is the multiplicative group of non-zero elements.
The systematic use of cyclic difference sets and methods for the construction of symmetric block designs dates back to R. C. Bose and a seminal paper of his in 1939.12 However, various examples appeared earlier than this, such as the "Paley Difference Sets" which date back to 1933.13 The generalization of the cyclic difference set concept to more general groups is due to R.H. Bruck14 in 1955.15 Multipliers were introduced by Marshall Hall Jr.16 in 1947.17
It is found by Xia, Zhou and Giannakis that difference sets can be used to construct a complex vector codebook that achieves the difficult Welch bound on maximum cross correlation amplitude. The so-constructed codebook also forms the so-called Grassmannian manifold.
A ( v , k , λ , s ) {\displaystyle (v,k,\lambda ,s)} difference family is a set of subsets B = { B 1 , … , B s } {\displaystyle B=\{B_{1},\ldots ,B_{s}\}} of a group G {\displaystyle G} such that the order of G {\displaystyle G} is v {\displaystyle v} , the size of B i {\displaystyle B_{i}} is k {\displaystyle k} for all i {\displaystyle i} , and every non-identity element of G {\displaystyle G} can be expressed as a product d 1 d 2 − 1 {\displaystyle d_{1}d_{2}^{-1}} of elements of B i {\displaystyle B_{i}} for some i {\displaystyle i} (i.e. both d 1 , d 2 {\displaystyle d_{1},d_{2}} come from the same B i {\displaystyle B_{i}} ) in exactly λ {\displaystyle \lambda } ways.
A difference set is a difference family with s = 1. {\displaystyle s=1.} The parameter equation above generalises to s ( k 2 − k ) = ( v − 1 ) λ . {\displaystyle s(k^{2}-k)=(v-1)\lambda .} 18 The development d e v ( B ) = { B i + g : i = 1 , … , s , g ∈ G } {\displaystyle dev(B)=\{B_{i}+g:i=1,\ldots ,s,g\in G\}} of a difference family is a 2-design. Every 2-design with a regular automorphism group is d e v ( B ) {\displaystyle dev(B)} for some difference family B . {\displaystyle B.}
van Lint & Wilson 1992, p. 331 - van Lint, J.H.; Wilson, R.M. (1992), A Course in Combinatorics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42260-4, Zbl 0769.05001 https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:0769.05001 ↩
Wallis 1988, p. 61 - Theorem 4.5 - Wallis, W.D. (1988). Combinatorial Designs. Marcel Dekker. ISBN 0-8247-7942-8. Zbl 0637.05004. https://archive.org/details/combinatorialdes0000wall ↩
van Lint & Wilson 1992, p. 331 - Theorem 27.2. The theorem only states point transitivity, but block transitivity follows from this by the second corollary on p. 330. - van Lint, J.H.; Wilson, R.M. (1992), A Course in Combinatorics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42260-4, Zbl 0769.05001 https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:0769.05001 ↩
Colbourn & Dinitz 2007, p. 420 (18.7 Remark 2) - Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (2007), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-506-1, Zbl 1101.05001 https://archive.org/details/handbookofcombin0000unse ↩
Colbourn & Dinitz 2007, p. 420 (18.7 Remark 1) - Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (2007), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-506-1, Zbl 1101.05001 https://archive.org/details/handbookofcombin0000unse ↩
Colbourn & Dinitz 2007, p. 420 (Remark 18.9) - Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (2007), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-506-1, Zbl 1101.05001 https://archive.org/details/handbookofcombin0000unse ↩
van Lint & Wilson 1992, p. 345 - van Lint, J.H.; Wilson, R.M. (1992), A Course in Combinatorics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42260-4, Zbl 0769.05001 https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:0769.05001 ↩
van Lint & Wilson 1992, p. 349 (Theorem 28.7) - van Lint, J.H.; Wilson, R.M. (1992), A Course in Combinatorics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42260-4, Zbl 0769.05001 https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:0769.05001 ↩
Beth, Jungnickel & Lenz 1986, p. 280 (Theorem 4.6) - Beth, Thomas; Jungnickel, Dieter; Lenz, Hanfried (1986), Design Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-33334-2, Zbl 0602.05001 https://archive.org/details/designtheory0000beth ↩
Colbourn & Dinitz 2007, pp. 422-425 - Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (2007), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-506-1, Zbl 1101.05001 https://archive.org/details/handbookofcombin0000unse ↩
Colbourn & Dinitz 2007, p. 425 (Construction 18.49) - Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (2007), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-506-1, Zbl 1101.05001 https://archive.org/details/handbookofcombin0000unse ↩
Bose, R.C. (1939), "On the construction of balanced incomplete block designs", Annals of Eugenics, 9 (4): 353–399, doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1939.tb02219.x, JFM 65.1110.04, Zbl 0023.00102 /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Wallis 1988, p. 69 - Wallis, W.D. (1988). Combinatorial Designs. Marcel Dekker. ISBN 0-8247-7942-8. Zbl 0637.05004. https://archive.org/details/combinatorialdes0000wall ↩
Bruck, R.H. (1955), "Difference sets in a finite group", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 78 (2): 464–481, doi:10.2307/1993074, JSTOR 1993074, Zbl 0065.13302 /wiki/Richard_Bruck ↩
van Lint & Wilson 1992, p. 340 - van Lint, J.H.; Wilson, R.M. (1992), A Course in Combinatorics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42260-4, Zbl 0769.05001 https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:0769.05001 ↩
Hall Jr., Marshall (1947), "Cyclic projective planes", Duke Mathematical Journal, 14 (4): 1079–1090, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-47-01482-8, S2CID 119846649, Zbl 0029.22502 /wiki/Marshall_Hall_(mathematician) ↩
Beth, Jungnickel & Lenz 1986, p. 275 - Beth, Thomas; Jungnickel, Dieter; Lenz, Hanfried (1986), Design Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-33334-2, Zbl 0602.05001 https://archive.org/details/designtheory0000beth ↩
Beth, Jungnickel & Lenz 1986, p. 310 (2.8.a) - Beth, Thomas; Jungnickel, Dieter; Lenz, Hanfried (1986), Design Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-33334-2, Zbl 0602.05001 https://archive.org/details/designtheory0000beth ↩