CAM software generally creates a tool path without considering any mechanics process. These causes risk of tool damage, tool deflection and errors on surface finish. By minimizing the forces we can increase tool life. Different optimization method can be used considering process parameters like feed rate, spindle speed, steps, tool diameter, magnitude and preset maximum force. The optimization can be done for minimum machining time, minimum tool travel, minimum production cost or for good surface finish. Efficiency of surface machined is also considered by maximum scallop height and by gouging. Gouging are the main reason for discrepancies of surface accuracy and texture specification. It also causes damage to parts, surface and machine tool. Scallop height tolerance help us in measuring the quality of free-form surface. Selection of proper topology result in minimum path length. In CAM software choosing NURBS to create surface is considered to be good method for presenting surface as it is accepted by both IGES and STEP files of CAM software.5
Lazoglu, I (2009). "Tool path optimization for free form surface machining". CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 58 (2009): 101–104. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.054. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Ding, S (February 2003). "Adaptive iso-planar tool path generation for machining of free-form surfaces". Computer-Aided Design. 35 (2): 141–153. doi:10.1016/s0010-4485(02)00048-9. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Kumar, Rajneesh (2006). "Optimization of CNC iso-scallop free form surface machining using a genetic algorithm". International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 46 (7–8): 811–819. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.028. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Lasemi, Ali (2010). "Recent development in CNC machining of freeform surfaces: A state-of-the-art review". Computer-Aided Design. 42 (7): 641–654. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.04.002. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Poniatowska, Malgorzata (2015). "Free-form surface machining error compensation applying 3D CAD machining pattern model". Computer-Aided Design. 62: 227–235. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2014.12.003. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩