There are many types of conjugate variables, depending on the type of work a certain system is doing (or is being subjected to). Examples of canonically conjugate variables include the following:
In classical physics, the derivatives of action are conjugate variables to the quantity with respect to which one is differentiating. In quantum mechanics, these same pairs of variables are related by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
In quantum mechanics, conjugate variables are realized as pairs of observables whose operators do not commute. In conventional terminology, they are said to be incompatible observables. Consider, as an example, the measurable quantities given by position ( x ) {\displaystyle \left(x\right)} and momentum ( p ) {\displaystyle \left(p\right)} . In the quantum-mechanical formalism, the two observables x {\displaystyle x} and p {\displaystyle p} correspond to operators x ^ {\displaystyle {\widehat {x}}} and p ^ {\displaystyle {\widehat {p\,}}} , which necessarily satisfy the canonical commutation relation: [ x ^ , p ^ ] = x ^ p ^ − p ^ x ^ = i ℏ {\displaystyle [{\widehat {x}},{\widehat {p\,}}]={\widehat {x}}{\widehat {p\,}}-{\widehat {p\,}}{\widehat {x}}=i\hbar }
For every non-zero commutator of two operators, there exists an "uncertainty principle", which in our present example may be expressed in the form: Δ x Δ p ≥ ℏ / 2 {\displaystyle \Delta x\,\Delta p\geq \hbar /2}
In this ill-defined notation, Δ x {\displaystyle \Delta x} and Δ p {\displaystyle \Delta p} denote "uncertainty" in the simultaneous specification of x {\displaystyle x} and p {\displaystyle p} . A more precise, and statistically complete, statement involving the standard deviation σ {\displaystyle \sigma } reads: σ x σ p ≥ ℏ / 2 {\displaystyle \sigma _{x}\sigma _{p}\geq \hbar /2}
More generally, for any two observables A {\displaystyle A} and B {\displaystyle B} corresponding to operators A ^ {\displaystyle {\widehat {A}}} and B ^ {\displaystyle {\widehat {B}}} , the generalized uncertainty principle is given by: σ A 2 σ B 2 ≥ ( 1 2 i ⟨ [ A ^ , B ^ ] ⟩ ) 2 {\displaystyle {\sigma _{A}}^{2}{\sigma _{B}}^{2}\geq \left({\frac {1}{2i}}\left\langle \left[{\widehat {A}},{\widehat {B}}\right]\right\rangle \right)^{2}}
Now suppose we were to explicitly define two particular operators, assigning each a specific mathematical form, such that the pair satisfies the aforementioned commutation relation. It's important to remember that our particular "choice" of operators would merely reflect one of many equivalent, or isomorphic, representations of the general algebraic structure that fundamentally characterizes quantum mechanics. The generalization is provided formally by the Heisenberg Lie algebra h 3 {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {h}}_{3}} , with a corresponding group called the Heisenberg group H 3 {\displaystyle H_{3}} .
In Hamiltonian fluid mechanics and quantum hydrodynamics, the action itself (or velocity potential) is the conjugate variable of the density (or probability density).
"Heisenberg – Quantum Mechanics, 1925–1927: The Uncertainty Relations". Archived from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2010-08-07. https://web.archive.org/web/20151222204440/https://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08a.htm ↩
Hjalmars, S. (1962). "Some remarks on time and energy as conjugate variables". Il Nuovo Cimento. 25 (2): 355–364. Bibcode:1962NCim...25..355H. doi:10.1007/BF02731451. S2CID 120008951. https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF02731451 ↩
Mann, S.; Haykin, S. (November 1995). "The chirplet transform: physical considerations" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 43 (11): 2745–2761. Bibcode:1995ITSP...43.2745M. doi:10.1109/78.482123. http://wearcam.org/chirplet.pdf ↩
Vool, Uri; Devoret, Michel (2017). "Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits". International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. 45 (7): 897–934. arXiv:1610.03438. doi:10.1002/cta.2359. ISSN 1097-007X. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cta.2359 ↩