Each 16-syllable hemistich (half-verse), of two 8-syllable pādas, can take either a pathyā ("normal") form or one of several vipulā ("extended") forms. The form of the second foot of the first pāda (II.) limits the possible patterns the first foot (I.) may assume.
The scheme below, given by Macdonell, shows his understanding of the form of the śloka in the classical period of Sanskrit literature (4th–11th centuries CE):
In poems of the intermediate period, such as the Bhagavad Gita, a fourth vipulā is found. This occurs 28 times in the Bhagavad Gita, that is, as often as the third vipulā.16 When this vipulā is used, there is a word-break (caesura) after the fourth syllable:17
Two rules that always apply are:18
The pathyā and vipulā half-verses are arranged in the table above in order of frequency of occurrence. Out of 2579 half-verses taken from Kalidasa, Bharavi, Magha, and Bilhana, each of the four admissible forms of śloka in this order claims the following share: 2289, 116, 89, 85;19 that is, 89% of the half-verses have the regular pathyā form.
The various vipulās, in the order above, are known to scholars writing in English as the first, second, third and fourth vipulā,20 or the paeanic, choriambic, molossic, and trochaic vipulā respectively.21 In Sanskrit writers, they are referred to as the na-, bha-, ma-, and ra-vipulā.22 A fifth vipulā, known as the minor Ionic, in which the first pāda ends | u u – x |, is sometimes found in the Mahābhārata, although rarely.23
Macdonell's chart given above is in fact too restrictive with regard the first four syllables in a vipulā verse. For example, the first quarter verse of the Rāmayaṇa (critical edition) contains a na-vipulā and scans ⏑ – – – ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ – (tapaḥsvādhyāyanirataṃ). Other examples are easy to find among classical poets, e.g., Rāmacarita 1.76 manyur dehāvadhir ayaṃ – – – – ⏑ ⏑ ⏑ –. In the ma-vipulā, a caesura is not obligatory after the fifth syllable, e.g., Śiśupālavadha 2.1a yiyakṣamāṇenāhūtaḥ ⏑ – ⏑ – – – – –.
Noteworthy is the avoidance of an iambic cadence in the first pāda. By comparison, syllables 5–8 of any pāda in the old Vedic anuṣṭubh metre typically had the iambic ending u – u x (where "x" represents an anceps syllable).
Statistical studies examining the frequency of the vipulās and the patterns in the earlier part of the pāda have been carried out to try to establish the preferences of various authors for different metrical patterns. It is believed that this may help to establish relative dates for the poems, and to identify interpolated passages.2425
A typical śloka is the following, which opens the Bhagavad Gita:
From the period of high classical Sanskrit literature comes this benediction, which opens Bāṇabhaṭṭa's biographical poem Harṣacaritam (7th century CE):
When a śloka is recited, performers sometimes leave a pause after each pāda, at other times only after the second pāda. (See External links.)
See also: mantra
A Shloka has to be composed in a specific metre (chhanda), with a specific number of lines with a specific number of words per line, each word could be a mantra. For example, viṣṇu sahastranāma is in anuṣṭup chhanda (two lines of four words each).
A mantra, on the other hand, is prefixed by omkara (primordial sound) and suffixed by the essential nama (name) and the salutary word nama (salutation) between the prefix and the suffix. No metre is prescribed. The lyrics in any Vārnic or matric metres are shlokas, but stanzas from Vedic hymns are not shloka, despite it being a common mistake to think this.27
Sanskrit Slokas With Meaning in Hindi https://www.motivatorindia.in/2019/12/sanskrit-slokas-with-meaning-hindi.html ↩
Macdonell, Arthur A., A Sanskrit Grammar for Students, Appendix II, p. 232 (Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 1927). ↩
Monier Monier-Williams (1923). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. pp. 1029–1030. https://books.google.com/books?id=_3NWAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA1029 ↩
For other definitions see: "श्लोक (zloka) - KST (Online Sanskrit Dictionary)". kosha.sanskrit.today. Retrieved 2023-04-23. https://kosha.sanskrit.today/word/sa/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%95?q=%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%95&scope=kosha ↩
W. J. Johnson (2010), Oxford Dictionary of Hinduism. ↩
Arnold 1905, p. 11, 50 with note ii(a). - Arnold, Edward Vernon (1905). Vedic Metre in its historical development. Cambridge University Press (Reprint 2009). ISBN 978-1113224446. https://archive.org/stream/vedicmetreinitsh00arnouoft#page/viii/mode/2up ↩
Friedrich Max Müller (1860). A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature. Williams and Norgate. pp. 67–70. https://archive.org/details/historyofancient00mlle ↩
Vishwakarma, Richa; Goswami, PradipKumar (2013). "A review through Charaka Uttara-Tantra". AYU. 34 (1): 17–20. doi:10.4103/0974-8520.115438. PMC 3764873. PMID 24049400. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764873 ↩
Hopkins 1901, p. 192. - Hopkins, E.W. (1901). "Epic versification". The Great Epic of India. New York: C. Scribner's Sons. ↩
Kireet Joshi (1991). The Veda and Indian Culture: An Introductory Essay. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 101–102. ISBN 978-81-208-0889-8. 978-81-208-0889-8 ↩
Vyas, Jaldhar H. (2004-03-10). "[Advaita-l] Difference bet. slokas and Mantras". Retrieved 2020-01-19. https://www.advaita-vedanta.org//archives/advaita-l/2004-March/012774.html ↩
Morton Smith, R. (1961). Ślokas and Vipulas. Indo-Iranian Journal Vol. 5, No. 1 (1961), pp. 19-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24646839 ↩
Michael Hahn: "A brief introduction into the Indian metrical system for the use of students". https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hahn ↩
Macdonell, Arthur A., A Sanskrit Grammar for Students, Appendix II, p. 233 (Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 1927) ↩
Keith (1920), p. 421. ↩
Morton Smith (1961), p. 19. ↩
Hopkins, p. 222. ↩
Morton Smith (1961). ↩
Brockington (1998), pp. 117–130. ↩
Translation from Daniel H. Ingalls (translator) (1965): Sanskrit Poetry, from Vidyākara's Treasury. (Harvard). ↩
Yelle, Robert A. (2004-03-01). Explaining Mantras. doi:10.4324/9780203483381. ISBN 9780203483381. 9780203483381 ↩