Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
t/Space
open-in-new
<h2 id="history">History</h2> <p>In September 2004 t/Space was one of eleven companies selected by NASA to conduct preliminary concept studies for the <a href="/facts/Crew_Exploration_Vehicle/aU3ltbmf">Crew Exploration Vehicle</a> and human lunar exploration, for which it received a US$3 million contract.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:1" href="#fn:1"><sup>1</sup></a> The company was competing with larger and more established companies such as <a href="/facts/Lockheed_Martin/URp9BQpA">Lockheed Martin</a>, <a href="/facts/Boeing/tF5sMe9F">Boeing</a>, and <a href="/facts/Northrop_Grumman/M6keKE1A">Northrop Grumman</a> to provide vehicle and architecture advice to NASA for the Vision for Space Exploration. </p><p>In May 2006, out of a field of more than 20 firms of all sizes,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a> the company was one of six finalists in the COTS competition for funded agreements with NASA.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a> <a href="/facts/SpaceX/2tKHsVdJ">SpaceX</a> and <a href="/facts/Rocketplane_Kistler/gf6ucquI">Rocketplane Kistler</a> received the two funded agreements in August 2006.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a> </p><p>In January 2007, NASA signed a Space Act Agreement with t/Space on technical assistance and data access to help the company develop its privately funded spacecraft for bringing passengers and cargo to the ISS and to private space habitats. </p><p>In 2011, t/Space proposed a recoverable, reusable transfer spacecraft—for an eight-person crew or <a href="/facts/Cargo_spacecraft/L8jVmKxl">space cargo</a>—to NASA under the <a href="/facts/Commercial_Crew_Development/zzwrbnDF">Commercial Crew Development</a> phase 2 program (CCDev2). The concept spacecraft could launch on a variety of launch vehicles, including the <a href="/facts/Atlas_V/5SNgegyt">Atlas V</a>, <a href="/facts/Falcon_9/mNck6vby">Falcon 9</a> and <a href="/facts/Taurus_II/bjaHqCmA">Taurus II</a>.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5"><sup>5</sup></a> The t/Space proposal was not selected for NASA funding.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6"><sup>6</sup></a> </p><p>Apparently t/space went out of business sometime before 2013.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7"><sup>7</sup></a> </p> <h2 id="people">People</h2> <p>The company's CEO is <a href="/facts/Charles_Duelfer/tGWPHpvc">Charles Duelfer</a> who ran the search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the President is David Gump of <a href="/facts/LunaCorp/LLPsQrDM">LunaCorp</a>.[<i>when?</i>] Lon Levin, a co-founder of XM Satellite Radio, is the Chief Strategy Officer; <a href="/facts/James_S._Voss/qEGmAJ6t">Jim Voss</a>, a five-time astronaut and member of Expedition Two to the ISS, is Vice President of Space Exploration Technology; and Bretton Alexander, a former White House aide who helped draft the plan to explore the Moon and Mars, is Vice President of Corporate and External Affairs. </p> <h2 id="cxv-proposal">CXV proposal</h2> <p>t/Space was working on designs[<i>when?</i>] for an <a href="/facts/Air_launch/g5rLwWY9">air-launched</a> passenger-carrying <a href="/facts/Space_capsule/wd4mpTCX">capsule</a> termed the Crew Transfer Vehicle, or CXV. In contrast to the Space Shuttle and other companies' <a href="/facts/Crew_Exploration_Vehicle/aU3ltbmf">CEV</a> proposals, this craft would be specialized for transferring astronauts to and from low Earth orbit along with modest amounts of cargo on the same flights. The capsule would be launched on an upscaled version of <a href="/facts/AirLaunch_LLC/mj4YVSWK">AirLaunch's</a> QuickReach rocket under development for <a href="/facts/DARPA/Uf9sarhT">DARPA</a>'s <a href="/facts/FALCON_(DARPA)/VJyetzev">FALCON</a> program. This rocket would be dropped from the bottom of a custom-designed <a href="/facts/Scaled_Composites/lnDfbH6d">Scaled Composites</a> aircraft, or a modified <a href="/facts/Boeing_747/jHjLqpbr">Boeing 747</a>, with landing gear modifications to accommodate the rocket. The return capsule uses a design similar to that of the <a href="/facts/Corona_(satellite)/oBd9damh">Corona</a> spy satellites. The capsule structure would be built by Scaled Composites. </p><p>Under their plan, the CXV would have been capable of docking with the <a href="/facts/International_Space_Station/VNPUBz9m">International Space Station</a>, a <a href="/facts/Bigelow_Commercial_Space_Station/v1Do73Bu">commercial habitat</a> such as those being developed by <a href="/facts/Bigelow_Aerospace/BaS0u7b8">Bigelow Aerospace</a>, or a CEV specialized for Earth-Moon transit. </p> <h2 id="vse-proposal">VSE proposal</h2> <p>t/Space's proposed architecture for the <a href="/facts/Vision_for_Space_Exploration/FY56Inv6">Vision for Space Exploration</a> emphasized market-based competition, with initial government funding intended to spawn a self-sustaining commercial infrastructure. In their proposal, NASA would have acted as a general goal-setter and consumer, t/Space would have developed an open overall architecture, and other companies would have competed to construct components of that architecture. </p><p>As of their December 2004 midterm architecture briefing to NASA, their proposed transportation architecture included three types of elements: Spiral 1 (Earth-to-orbit), Spiral 2 (Earth-to-Moon), and launch elements. In general, their plan for a lunar expedition involved the use of a flotilla of small, simple, and inexpensive vehicles, rather than a single elaborate vehicle. </p> <h3>Spiral 1 (Earth-to-orbit)</h3> <p>Initially this would have consisted only of an S1 CXV, a small craft designed to transport a crew of up to six between the Earth's surface and <a href="/facts/Low_Earth_orbit/rq1TwayJ">low Earth orbit</a>. </p><p>In preparation for a lunar mission a series of S1 Tankers would have been designed and launched, to transport propellant to orbit. </p> <h3>Spiral 2 (Earth-to-Moon)</h3> <p>The S2 CEV was designed to transport up to six crew between <a href="/facts/Low_Earth_orbit/rq1TwayJ">low Earth orbit</a> and the <a href="/facts/Moon/zKHqEMPb">Moon</a>. These vehicles would have been launched uncrewed, with crew being launched on an S1 CXV and transferring in-orbit to the larger craft via docking. For each S2 CEV, eight S1 Tanker flights were needed to supply fuel in orbit. After a mission the S2 CEV wouldn't have reentered the atmosphere, but would have instead transferred crew back to an S1 CXV. </p><p>The S2 Tanker was designed to supply fuel to S2 CEVs en route to the Moon. Filling an individual S2 Tanker would have required sixteen S1 Tanker flights. </p><p>The plan for a lunar mission involved two S2 CEVs departing from Earth orbit with crews of 2-3 (half the maximum) and large amounts of cargo (much of which was to be deposited at the Moon). The S2 CEVs were refueled en route by the S2 Tankers. If one of the S2 CEVs were damaged, the crew from both vehicles could empty excess cargo from the remaining vehicle and use a single S2 CEV to return to Earth orbit. If both vehicles were operational, additional lunar samples may have been returned. </p> <h3>Launch elements</h3> <p>The architecture was intended to be modular, with Spiral 1 and 2 elements to be launched on commercially produced rockets. The company was outlining a couple of options: an airplane-launched rocket system to be developed by Scaled Composites and AirLaunch LLC, and ground launch systems developed by companies such as SpaceX and <a href="/facts/Kistler_Aerospace/gf6ucquI">Kistler Aerospace</a>. </p> <h2 id="gallery">Gallery</h2> <h2 id="external-links">External links</h2> <ul><li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20040908181746/http://www.transformspace.com/">t/Space website</a></li> <li><a href="https://exploration.nasa.gov/documents/reports/cer_final/tSpace.pdf">Final architecture briefing to NASA - 2 Mar 2005</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/65852main_tSpace.pdf">Initial concept presentation - 13 Sep 2004</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.nasa.gov/missions/solarsystem/vision_concepts.html">NASA page on preliminary VSE concept studies - last updated 22 Nov 2007, accessed 2008-07-03</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_050509.html">t/Space Offers an Option for Closing Shuttle, CEV Gap</a> (Space.com, May 9, 2005)</li> <li><a href="http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050510-093535-1161r.htm">Space Race 2: Son of Shuttle</a> (Washington Times, May 10, 2005)</li> <li><a href="https://www.wired.com/news/space/0,2697,68528,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1">NASA Launches Startups for Ships</a> (Wired, August 18, 2005)</li> <li><a href="http://chairforceengineer.blogspot.com/2006/02/transform-space.html">Analysis of t/Space's proposal</a> (Chair Force Engineer, February 9, 2006)</li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ukz5rYnqwWU">Video animation of the carrier aircraft (VLA), booster (QuickReach 2), and crew vehicle (CXV) concept of operations</a></li></ul> <h2 id="references">References</h2> <ol> <li id="fn:1"><p>"t/Space Wins NASA Lunar Exploration Contract". SpaceRef.com. 2004-09-02. Retrieved 2008-07-04. <a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14933" target="_blank">http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14933</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:2"><p>Boyle, Alan. "Private ventures vie to service space station". NBC News. Archived from the original on December 25, 2013. Retrieved 2011-12-19. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131225211746/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/11927039/" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20131225211746/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/11927039/</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:3"><p>Belfiore, Michael (May 9, 2006). "NASA makes first round of cuts for COTS". Dispatches from the Final Frontier. Archived from the original on 2006-06-14. Retrieved 2011-12-19. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060614075601/http://michaelbelfiore.com/blog/2006/05/nasa-makes-first-round-of-cuts-for.html" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20060614075601/http://michaelbelfiore.com/blog/2006/05/nasa-makes-first-round-of-cuts-for.html</a> <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:4"><p>"NASA Selects Crew and Cargo Transportation to Orbit Partners" (Press release). NASA. 2006-08-18. Retrieved 2011-12-19. <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06295_COTS_phase_1.html" target="_blank">https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06295_COTS_phase_1.html</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:5"><p>Boyle, Alan (2011-02-11). "Let's talk about the final frontier". Cosmic Log. MSNBC. Archived from the original on 2011-02-15. Retrieved 2011-02-13. the proposal calls for the development of a spaceship that could be sent into space on a variety of launch vehicles. ... "Up to eight crew, Soyuz-like architecture (recoverable reusable crew element, expendable orbital/cargo module). Incorporates HMX's patented integral abort system (uses OMS/RCS propellant in separate abort engines). Can fly on Atlas 401 [a configuration for the Atlas 5 rocket], F9 [SpaceX's Falcon 9] or Taurus II (enhanced) but with a reduced cargo and crew capability on the latter vehicle. Goal is to be the lowest-price provider on a per-seat basis. Nominal land recovery with water backup." <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110215002006/http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/02/11/6035600-lets-talk-about-the-final-frontier" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20110215002006/http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/02/11/6035600-lets-talk-about-the-final-frontier</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:6"><p>Morring, Frank Jr. (2011-04-22). "Five Vehicles Vie To Succeed Space Shuttle". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 2011-12-21. Retrieved 2011-02-23. the CCDev-2 awards, ... went to Blue Origin, Boeing, Sierra Nevada Corp. and Space Exploration Technologies Inc. (SpaceX). <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20111221070704/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news%2Fawst%2F2011%2F04%2F25%2FAW_04_25_2011_p24-313867.xml&headline=Five%20Vehicles%20Vie%20To%20Succeed%20Space%20Shuttle" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20111221070704/http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news%2Fawst%2F2011%2F04%2F25%2FAW_04_25_2011_p24-313867.xml&headline=Five%20Vehicles%20Vie%20To%20Succeed%20Space%20Shuttle</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:7"><p>"Opinion: Cautious Optimism Required for Commercial Space in 2013". 6 January 2013. <a href="https://www.americaspace.com/2013/01/06/opinion-cautious-optimism-required-for-commercial-space-in-2013/" target="_blank">https://www.americaspace.com/2013/01/06/opinion-cautious-optimism-required-for-commercial-space-in-2013/</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> </ol>