De Branges's theorem

<h2 id="schlicht-functions">Schlicht functions</h2>
The normalizations

a
          
            0
          
        
        =
        0
         
        
          and
        
         
        
          a
          
            1
          
        
        =
        1
      
    
    {\displaystyle a_{0}=0\ {\text{and}}\ a_{1}=1}

mean that

f
        (
        0
        )
        =
        0
         
        
          and
        
         
        
          f
          ′
        
        (
        0
        )
        =
        1.
      
    
    {\displaystyle f(0)=0\ {\text{and}}\ f'(0)=1.}

This can always be obtained by an <a href="/facts/Affine_transformation/BD7yDr10">affine transformation</a>: starting with an arbitrary injective holomorphic function 
 
 
 
 g
 
 
 {\displaystyle g}
 
 defined on the open unit disk and setting

f
        (
        z
        )
        =
        
          
            
              g
              (
              z
              )
              −
              g
              (
              0
              )
            
            
              
                g
                ′
              
              (
              0
              )
            
          
        
        .
      
    
    {\displaystyle f(z)={\frac {g(z)-g(0)}{g'(0)}}.}

Such functions 
 
 
 
 g
 
 
 {\displaystyle g}
 
 are of interest because they appear in the <a href="/facts/Riemann_mapping_theorem/fccJxCSl">Riemann mapping theorem</a>.
A schlicht function is defined as an analytic function 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 that is one-to-one and satisfies 
 
 
 
 f
 (
 0
 )
 =
 0
 
 
 {\displaystyle f(0)=0}
 
 and 
 
 
 
 
 f
 ′
 
 (
 0
 )
 =
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle f'(0)=1}
 
. A family of schlicht functions are the <a href="/facts/Rotated_Koebe_function/IAyU9SWC">rotated Koebe functions</a>

f
          
            α
          
        
        (
        z
        )
        =
        
          
            z
            
              (
              1
              −
              α
              z
              
                )
                
                  2
                
              
            
          
        
        =
        
          ∑
          
            n
            =
            1
          
          
            ∞
          
        
        n
        
          α
          
            n
            −
            1
          
        
        
          z
          
            n
          
        
      
    
    {\displaystyle f_{\alpha }(z)={\frac {z}{(1-\alpha z)^{2}}}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }n\alpha ^{n-1}z^{n}}

with 
 
 
 
 α
 
 
 {\displaystyle \alpha }
 
 a <a href="/facts/Complex_number/2w7mqI7e">complex number</a> of <a href="/facts/Absolute_value/dwJBpEs5">absolute value</a> 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1}
 
. If 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 is a schlicht function and 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 n
 
 
 
 |
 
 =
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{n}|=n}
 
 for some

n
 ≥
 2
 
 
 {\displaystyle n\geq 2}
 
, then 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 is a rotated Koebe function.
The condition of de Branges' theorem is not sufficient to show the function is schlicht, as the function

f
        (
        z
        )
        =
        z
        +
        
          z
          
            2
          
        
        =
        (
        z
        +
        1
        
          /
        
        2
        
          )
          
            2
          
        
        −
        1
        
          /
        
        4
      
    
    {\displaystyle f(z)=z+z^{2}=(z+1/2)^{2}-1/4}

shows: it is holomorphic on the unit disc and satisfies 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 n
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{n}|\leq n}
 
 for all 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
, but it is not injective since

f
 (
 −
 1
 
 /
 
 2
 +
 z
 )
 =
 f
 (
 −
 1
 
 /
 
 2
 −
 z
 )
 
 
 {\displaystyle f(-1/2+z)=f(-1/2-z)}
 
.

<h2 id="history">History</h2>
A survey of the history is given by <a href="http://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-200604038936/1/prep0513.pdf">Koepf (2007)</a>.
Bieberbach (1916) proved 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 2
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 2
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{2}|\leq 2}
 
, and stated the conjecture that 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 n
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{n}|\leq n}
 
. Löwner (1917) and Nevanlinna (1921) independently proved the conjecture for <a href="/facts/Nevanlinna%2527s_criterion/RHvWbpuh">starlike functions</a>.
Then <a href="/facts/Charles_Loewner/caA1Feuu">Charles Loewner</a> (Löwner (1923)) proved 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 3
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 3
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{3}|\leq 3}
 
, using the <a href="/facts/L%25C3%25B6wner_equation/7Hm3Cs80">Löwner equation</a>. His work was used by most later attempts, and is also applied in the theory of <a href="/facts/Schramm%25E2%2580%2593Loewner_evolution/7Hm3Cs80">Schramm–Loewner evolution</a>.
Littlewood (1925, theorem 20) proved that 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 n
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 e
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{n}|\leq en}
 
 for all 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
, showing that the Bieberbach conjecture is true up to a factor of 
 
 
 
 e
 =
 2.718
 …
 
 
 {\displaystyle e=2.718\ldots }
 
 Several authors later reduced the constant in the inequality below 
 
 
 
 e
 
 
 {\displaystyle e}
 
.
If 
 
 
 
 f
 (
 z
 )
 =
 z
 +
 ⋯
 
 
 {\displaystyle f(z)=z+\cdots }
 
 is a schlicht function then 
 
 
 
 φ
 (
 z
 )
 =
 z
 (
 f
 (
 
 z
 
 2
 
 
 )
 
 /
 
 
 z
 
 2
 
 
 
 )
 
 1
 
 /
 
 2
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle \varphi (z)=z(f(z^{2})/z^{2})^{1/2}}
 
 is an odd schlicht function. 
<a href="/facts/Raymond_Paley/bu02ExE7">Paley</a> and <a href="/facts/John_Edensor_Littlewood/guVFHXYA"> Littlewood</a> (1932) showed that its Taylor coefficients satisfy 
 
 
 
 
 b
 
 k
 
 
 ≤
 14
 
 
 {\displaystyle b_{k}\leq 14}
 
 for all 
 
 
 
 k
 
 
 {\displaystyle k}
 
. They conjectured that 
 
 
 
 14
 
 
 {\displaystyle 14}
 
 can be replaced by 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1}
 
 as a natural generalization of the Bieberbach conjecture. The Littlewood–Paley conjecture easily implies the Bieberbach conjecture using the Cauchy inequality, but it was soon disproved by Fekete & Szegő (1933), who showed there is an odd schlicht function with 
 
 
 
 
 b
 
 5
 
 
 =
 1
 
 /
 
 2
 +
 exp
 ⁡
 (
 −
 2
 
 /
 
 3
 )
 =
 1.013
 …
 
 
 {\displaystyle b_{5}=1/2+\exp(-2/3)=1.013\ldots }
 
, and that this is the maximum possible value of 
 
 
 
 
 b
 
 5
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle b_{5}}
 
. <a href="/facts/Isaak_Milin/bTFY3XPx">Isaak Milin</a> later showed that 
 
 
 
 14
 
 
 {\displaystyle 14}
 
 can be replaced by 
 
 
 
 1.14
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1.14}
 
, and Hayman showed that the numbers 
 
 
 
 
 b
 
 k
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle b_{k}}
 
 have a limit less than 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1}
 
 if 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 is not a Koebe function (for which the 
 
 
 
 
 b
 
 2
 k
 +
 1
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle b_{2k+1}}
 
 are all 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1}
 
). So the limit is always less than or equal to 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1}
 
, meaning that Littlewood and Paley's conjecture is true for all but a finite number of coefficients. A weaker form of Littlewood and Paley's conjecture was found by Robertson (1936).
The Robertson conjecture states that if

ϕ
        (
        z
        )
        =
        
          b
          
            1
          
        
        z
        +
        
          b
          
            3
          
        
        
          z
          
            3
          
        
        +
        
          b
          
            5
          
        
        
          z
          
            5
          
        
        +
        ⋯
      
    
    {\displaystyle \phi (z)=b_{1}z+b_{3}z^{3}+b_{5}z^{5}+\cdots }

is an odd schlicht function in the unit disk with 
 
 
 
 
 b
 
 1
 
 
 =
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle b_{1}=1}
 
 then for all positive integers 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
,

∑
          
            k
            =
            1
          
          
            n
          
        
        
          |
        
        
          b
          
            2
            k
            +
            1
          
        
        
          
            |
          
          
            2
          
        
        ≤
        n
        .
      
    
    {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}|b_{2k+1}|^{2}\leq n.}

Robertson observed that his conjecture is still strong enough to imply the Bieberbach conjecture, and proved it for 
 
 
 
 n
 =
 3
 
 
 {\displaystyle n=3}
 
. This conjecture introduced the key idea of bounding various quadratic functions of the coefficients rather than the coefficients themselves, which is equivalent to bounding norms of elements in certain Hilbert spaces of schlicht functions.
There were several proofs of the Bieberbach conjecture for certain higher values of 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
, in particular Garabedian & Schiffer (1955) proved 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 4
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 4
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{4}|\leq 4}
 
, Ozawa (1969) and Pederson (1968) proved 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 6
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 6
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{6}|\leq 6}
 
, and Pederson & Schiffer (1972) proved 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 5
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 5
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{5}|\leq 5}
 
.
Hayman (1955) proved that the limit of 
 
 
 
 
 a
 
 n
 
 
 
 /
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle a_{n}/n}
 
 exists, and has absolute value less than 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 {\displaystyle 1}
 
 unless 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 is a Koebe function. In particular this showed that for any 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 there can be at most a finite number of exceptions to the Bieberbach conjecture.
The Milin conjecture states that for each schlicht function on the unit disk, and for all positive integers 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
,

∑
          
            k
            =
            1
          
          
            n
          
        
        (
        n
        −
        k
        +
        1
        )
        (
        k
        
          |
        
        
          γ
          
            k
          
        
        
          
            |
          
          
            2
          
        
        −
        1
        
          /
        
        k
        )
        ≤
        0
      
    
    {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}(n-k+1)(k|\gamma _{k}|^{2}-1/k)\leq 0}

where the logarithmic coefficients 
 
 
 
 
 γ
 
 n
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle \gamma _{n}}
 
 of 
 
 
 
 f
 
 
 {\displaystyle f}
 
 are given by

log
        ⁡
        (
        f
        (
        z
        )
        
          /
        
        z
        )
        =
        2
        
          ∑
          
            n
            =
            1
          
          
            ∞
          
        
        
          γ
          
            n
          
        
        
          z
          
            n
          
        
        .
      
    
    {\displaystyle \log(f(z)/z)=2\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\gamma _{n}z^{n}.}

Milin (1977) showed using the <a href="/facts/Lebedev%25E2%2580%2593Milin_inequality/TrnNLLVo">Lebedev–Milin inequality</a> that the Milin conjecture (later proved by de Branges) implies the Robertson conjecture and therefore the Bieberbach conjecture.
Finally de Branges (1987) proved 
 
 
 
 
 |
 
 
 a
 
 n
 
 
 
 |
 
 ≤
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle |a_{n}|\leq n}
 
 for all 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
.

<h2 id="de-brangess-proof">De Branges's proof</h2>
The proof uses a type of <a href="/facts/Hilbert_space/aDFMh4lV">Hilbert space</a> of <a href="/facts/Entire_function/XNluKzu7">entire functions</a>. The study of these spaces grew into a sub-field of complex analysis and the spaces have come to be called <a href="/facts/De_Branges_space/yNzdbKvk">de Branges spaces</a>. De Branges proved the stronger Milin conjecture (Milin 1977) on logarithmic coefficients. This was already known to imply the Robertson conjecture (Robertson 1936) about odd univalent functions, which in turn was known to imply the Bieberbach conjecture about schlicht functions (Bieberbach 1916). His proof uses the <a href="/facts/Loewner_equation/zWsYnBu8">Loewner equation</a>, the <a href="/facts/Askey%25E2%2580%2593Gasper_inequality/Kcj7p0y2">Askey–Gasper inequality</a> about <a href="/facts/Jacobi_polynomial/5oKJKB1W">Jacobi polynomials</a>, and the <a href="/facts/Lebedev%25E2%2580%2593Milin_inequality/TrnNLLVo">Lebedev–Milin inequality</a> on exponentiated power series.
De Branges reduced the conjecture to some inequalities for Jacobi polynomials, and verified the first few by hand. <a href="/facts/Walter_Gautschi/tV4FWgMS">Walter Gautschi</a> verified more of these inequalities by computer for de Branges (proving the Bieberbach conjecture for the first 30 or so coefficients) and then asked <a href="/facts/Richard_Askey/r6ScCdJa">Richard Askey</a> whether he knew of any similar inequalities. Askey pointed out that Askey & Gasper (1976) had proved the necessary inequalities eight years before, which allowed de Branges to complete his proof. The first version was very long and had some minor mistakes which caused some skepticism about it, but these were corrected with the help of members of the Leningrad seminar on Geometric Function Theory (<a href="/facts/St._Petersburg_Department_of_Steklov_Institute_of_Mathematics_of_Russian_Academy_of_Sciences/F1CdJq8k">Leningrad Department of Steklov Mathematical Institute</a>) when de Branges visited in 1984.
De Branges proved the following result, which for 
 
 
 
 ν
 =
 0
 
 
 {\displaystyle \nu =0}
 
 implies the Milin conjecture (and therefore the Bieberbach conjecture). 
Suppose that 
 
 
 
 ν
 >
 −
 3
 
 /
 
 2
 
 
 {\displaystyle \nu >-3/2}
 
 and 
 
 
 
 
 σ
 
 n
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle \sigma _{n}}
 
 are real numbers for positive integers 
 
 
 
 n
 
 
 {\displaystyle n}
 
 with limit 
 
 
 
 0
 
 
 {\displaystyle 0}
 
 and such that

ρ
          
            n
          
        
        =
        
          
            
              Γ
              (
              2
              ν
              +
              n
              +
              1
              )
            
            
              Γ
              (
              n
              +
              1
              )
            
          
        
        (
        
          σ
          
            n
          
        
        −
        
          σ
          
            n
            +
            1
          
        
        )
      
    
    {\displaystyle \rho _{n}={\frac {\Gamma (2\nu +n+1)}{\Gamma (n+1)}}(\sigma _{n}-\sigma _{n+1})}

is non-negative, non-increasing, and has limit 
 
 
 
 0
 
 
 {\displaystyle 0}
 
. Then for all Riemann mapping functions 
 
 
 
 F
 (
 z
 )
 =
 z
 +
 ⋯
 
 
 {\displaystyle F(z)=z+\cdots }
 
 univalent in the unit disk with

F
              (
              z
              
                )
                
                  ν
                
              
              −
              
                z
                
                  ν
                
              
            
            ν
          
        
        =
        
          ∑
          
            n
            =
            1
          
          
            ∞
          
        
        
          a
          
            n
          
        
        
          z
          
            ν
            +
            n
          
        
      
    
    {\displaystyle {\frac {F(z)^{\nu }-z^{\nu }}{\nu }}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}z^{\nu +n}}

the maximum value of

∑
          
            n
            =
            1
          
          
            ∞
          
        
        (
        ν
        +
        n
        )
        
          σ
          
            n
          
        
        
          |
        
        
          a
          
            n
          
        
        
          
            |
          
          
            2
          
        
      
    
    {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }(\nu +n)\sigma _{n}|a_{n}|^{2}}

is achieved by the Koebe function 
 
 
 
 z
 
 /
 
 (
 1
 −
 z
 
 )
 
 2
 
 
 
 
 {\displaystyle z/(1-z)^{2}}
 
.
A simplified version of the proof was published in 1985 by Carl FitzGerald and <a href="/facts/Christian_Pommerenke/7xpHq182">Christian Pommerenke</a> (FitzGerald & Pommerenke (1985)), and an even shorter description by <a href="/facts/Jacob_Korevaar/9gMcynkv">Jacob Korevaar</a> (Korevaar (1986)). A very short proof avoiding use of the inequalities of Askey and Gasper was later found by Lenard Weinstein (Weinstein (1991)).

<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Grunsky_matrix/uz0QuIfD">Grunsky matrix</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Fekete%25E2%2580%2593Szeg%25C5%2591_inequality/sCqBTB40">Fekete–Szegő inequality</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Schwarz_lemma/70DeQvPJ">Schwarz lemma</a></li></ul>

<ul><li><a href="/facts/Richard_Askey/r6ScCdJa">Askey, Richard</a>; Gasper, George (1976), "Positive Jacobi polynomial sums. II", <a href="/facts/American_Journal_of_Mathematics/lkgftcD7">American Journal of Mathematics</a>, 98 (3): 709–737, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2373813">10.2307/2373813</a>, <a href="/facts/ISSN_(identifier)/DPAflDvU">ISSN</a> <a href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0002-9327">0002-9327</a>, <a href="/facts/JSTOR_(identifier)/YTeVmaJ7">JSTOR</a> <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2373813">2373813</a>, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0430358">0430358</a></li>
<li>Baernstein, Albert; Drasin, David; Duren, Peter; et al., eds. (1986), The Bieberbach conjecture, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 21, Providence, R.I.: <a href="/facts/American_Mathematical_Society/fr5gotCt">American Mathematical Society</a>, pp. xvi+218, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1090%2Fsurv%2F021">10.1090/surv/021</a>, <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-0-8218-1521-2, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0875226">0875226</a></li>
<li>Bieberbach, L. (1916), "Über die Koeffizienten derjenigen Potenzreihen, welche eine schlichte Abbildung des Einheitskreises vermitteln", Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys-Math. Kl.: 940–955</li>
<li><a href="/facts/John_B._Conway/7aMjnAxr">Conway, John B.</a> (1995), Functions of One Complex Variable II, Berlin, New York: <a href="/facts/Springer-Verlag/nAesf6nT">Springer-Verlag</a>, <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-0-387-94460-9</li>
<li><a href="/facts/Louis_de_Branges_de_Bourcia/CJmL8SYU">de Branges, Louis</a> (1985), "A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture", <a href="/facts/Acta_Mathematica/11kbuhDT">Acta Mathematica</a>, 154 (1): 137–152, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF02392821">10.1007/BF02392821</a>, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0772434">0772434</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Louis_de_Branges_de_Bourcia/CJmL8SYU">de Branges, Louis</a> (1987), "Underlying concepts in the proof of the Bieberbach conjecture", Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Berkeley, Calif., 1986), Providence, R.I.: <a href="/facts/American_Mathematical_Society/fr5gotCt">American Mathematical Society</a>, pp. 25–42, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0934213">0934213</a></li>
<li>Drasin, David; Duren, Peter; Marden, Albert, eds. (1986), "The Bieberbach Conjecture", Proceedings of the symposium on the occasion of the proof of the Bieberbach conjecture held at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., March 11—14, 1985, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 21, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. xvi+218, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1090%2Fsurv%2F021">10.1090/surv/021</a>, <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-8218-1521-0, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0875226">0875226</a></li>
<li>Fekete, M.; <a href="/facts/G%25C3%25A1bor_Szeg%25C5%2591/tTe7QQ8y">Szegő, G.</a> (1933), "Eine Bemerkung Über Ungerade Schlichte Funktionen", J. London Math. Soc., s1-8 (2): 85–89, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1112%2Fjlms%2Fs1-8.2.85">10.1112/jlms/s1-8.2.85</a></li>
<li>FitzGerald, Carl; Pommerenke, Christian (1985), "The de Branges theorem on univalent functions", Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 290 (2): 683, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2000306">10.2307/2000306</a>, <a href="/facts/JSTOR_(identifier)/YTeVmaJ7">JSTOR</a> <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2000306">2000306</a></li>
<li>Garabedian, P. R.; Schiffer, M. (1955). "A Proof of the Bieberbach Conjecture for the Fourth Coefficient". Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis. 4: 427–465. <a href="/facts/ISSN_(identifier)/DPAflDvU">ISSN</a> <a href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1943-5282">1943-5282</a>. <a href="/facts/JSTOR_(identifier)/YTeVmaJ7">JSTOR</a> <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/24900366">24900366</a>.</li>
<li>Goluzina, E.G. (2001) [1994], <a href="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Bieberbach_conjecture">"Bieberbach conjecture"</a>, <a href="/facts/Encyclopedia_of_Mathematics/WC6mGtPm">Encyclopedia of Mathematics</a>, <a href="/facts/European_Mathematical_Society/B3h7b672">EMS Press</a></li>
<li>Grinshpan, Arcadii Z. (1999), "The Bieberbach conjecture and Milin's functionals", <a href="/facts/American_Mathematical_Monthly/Te6CHvkg">The American Mathematical Monthly</a>, 106 (3): 203–214, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2589676">10.2307/2589676</a>, <a href="/facts/JSTOR_(identifier)/YTeVmaJ7">JSTOR</a> <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2589676">2589676</a>, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1682341">1682341</a></li>
<li>Grinshpan, Arcadii Z. (2002), "Logarithmic Geometry, Exponentiation, and Coefficient Bounds in the Theory of Univalent Functions and Nonoverlapping Domains", in Kuhnau, Reiner (ed.), Geometric Function Theory, Handbook of Complex Analysis, vol. 1, <a href="/facts/Amsterdam/Xdd393bz">Amsterdam</a>: <a href="/facts/North-Holland_Publishing_Company/jkPSAEmR">North-Holland</a>, pp. 273–332, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS1874-5709%2802%2980012-9">10.1016/S1874-5709(02)80012-9</a>, <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-444-82845-1, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1966197">1966197</a>, <a href="/facts/Zbl_(identifier)/P6rFxKKx">Zbl</a> <a href="https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:1083.30017">1083.30017</a>.</li>
<li>Hayman, W. K. (1955), "The asymptotic behaviour of p-valent functions", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Third Series, 5 (3): 257–284, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1112%2Fplms%2Fs3-5.3.257">10.1112/plms/s3-5.3.257</a>, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0071536">0071536</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Walter_Hayman/r8Tkbm6a">Hayman, W. K.</a> (1994), "De Branges' Theorem", Multivalent functions, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 110 (2nd ed.), <a href="/facts/Cambridge_University_Press/fgEBSSRq">Cambridge University Press</a>, <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0521460263</li>
<li>Koepf, Wolfram (2007), <a href="http://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-200604038936/1/prep0513.pdf">Bieberbach’s Conjecture, the de Branges and Weinstein Functions and the Askey-Gasper Inequality</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Jacob_Korevaar/9gMcynkv">Korevaar, Jacob</a> (1986), <a href="http://www.maa.org/programs/maa-awards/writing-awards/ludwig-bieberbachs-conjecture-and-its-proof-by-louis-de-branges">"Ludwig Bieberbach's conjecture and its proof by Louis de Branges"</a>, <a href="/facts/American_Mathematical_Monthly/Te6CHvkg">The American Mathematical Monthly</a>, 93 (7): 505–514, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2323021">10.2307/2323021</a>, <a href="/facts/ISSN_(identifier)/DPAflDvU">ISSN</a> <a href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0002-9890">0002-9890</a>, <a href="/facts/JSTOR_(identifier)/YTeVmaJ7">JSTOR</a> <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2323021">2323021</a>, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0856290">0856290</a></li>
<li>Littlewood, J. E. (1925), "On Inequalities in the Theory of Functions", Proc. London Math. Soc., s2-23: 481–519, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1112%2Fplms%2Fs2-23.1.481">10.1112/plms/s2-23.1.481</a></li>
<li>Littlewood, J.E.; Paley, E. A. C. (1932), "A Proof That An Odd Schlicht Function Has Bounded Coefficients", J. London Math. Soc., s1-7 (3): 167–169, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1112%2Fjlms%2Fs1-7.3.167">10.1112/jlms/s1-7.3.167</a></li>
<li>Löwner, C. (1917), "Untersuchungen über die Verzerrung bei konformen Abbildungen des Einheitskreises /z/ < 1, die durch Funktionen mit nicht verschwindender Ableitung geliefert werden", Ber. Verh. Sachs. Ges. Wiss. Leipzig, 69: 89–106</li>
<li>Löwner, C. (1923), "Untersuchungen über schlichte konforme Abbildungen des Einheitskreises. I", Math. Ann., 89 (1–2): 103–121, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF01448091">10.1007/BF01448091</a>, <a href="/facts/Hdl_(identifier)/rdebSxmC">hdl</a>:<a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz%2F125927">10338.dmlcz/125927</a>, <a href="/facts/JFM_(identifier)/P6rFxKKx">JFM</a> <a href="https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:49.0714.01">49.0714.01</a></li>
<li>Milin, I. M. (1977), Univalent functions and orthonormal systems, Providence, R.I.: <a href="/facts/American_Mathematical_Society/fr5gotCt">American Mathematical Society</a>, <a href="/facts/MR_(identifier)/uP137L11">MR</a> <a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0369684">0369684</a> (Translation of the 1971 Russian edition)</li>
<li>Nevanlinna, R. (1921), "Über die konforme Abbildung von Sterngebieten", Ofvers. Finska Vet. Soc. Forh., 53: 1–21</li>
<li>Ozawa, Mitsuru (1 January 1969). <a href="https://doi.org/10.2996%2Fkmj%2F1138845834">"On the Bieberbach conjecture for the sixth coefficient"</a>. Kodai Mathematical Journal. 21 (1): 97–128. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.2996%2Fkmj%2F1138845834">10.2996/kmj/1138845834</a>.</li>
<li>Pederson, Roger N. (December 1968). "A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture for the sixth coefficient". Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis. 31 (5): 331–351. <a href="/facts/Bibcode_(identifier)/9HtdQSGB">Bibcode</a>:<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ArRMA..31..331P">1968ArRMA..31..331P</a>. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00251415">10.1007/BF00251415</a>.</li>
<li>Pederson, R.; Schiffer, M. (1972). "A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture for the fifth coefficient". Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis. 45 (3): 161–193. <a href="/facts/Bibcode_(identifier)/9HtdQSGB">Bibcode</a>:<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ArRMA..45..161P">1972ArRMA..45..161P</a>. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00281531">10.1007/BF00281531</a>.</li>
<li>Robertson, M. S. (1936), <a href="https://www.ams.org/bull/1936-42-06/S0002-9904-1936-06300-7/">"A remark on the odd schlicht functions"</a>, <a href="/facts/Bulletin_of_the_American_Mathematical_Society/8ER5KY5z">Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society</a>, 42 (6): 366–370, <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1090%2FS0002-9904-1936-06300-7">10.1090/S0002-9904-1936-06300-7</a></li>
<li>Weinstein, L. (1991). "The Bieberbach conjecture". International Mathematics Research Notices. 1991 (5): 61–64. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1155%2FS1073792891000089">10.1155/S1073792891000089</a>.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)</li>
<li>Zorn, P. (1986). <a href="https://maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Allendoerfer/1987/0025570x.di021145.02p0002y.pdf">"The Bieberbach Conjecture"</a> (PDF). Mathematics Magazine. 59 (3): 131–148. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080%2F0025570X.1986.11977236">10.1080/0025570X.1986.11977236</a>. <a href="https://maa.org/programs/maa-awards/writing-awards/the-bieberbach-conjecture">"The Bieberbach Conjecture by Paul Zorn; Award: Carl B. Allendoerfer; Year of Award: 1987"</a>. Writing Awards, Mathematical Association of America (maa.org).</li></ul>
<h2 id="further-reading">Further reading</h2>
<ul><li>Liu, Xiaosong; Liu, Taishun; Xu, Qinghua (2015). "A proof of a weak version of the Bieberbach conjecture in several complex variables". Science China Mathematics. 58 (12): 2531–2540. <a href="/facts/Bibcode_(identifier)/9HtdQSGB">Bibcode</a>:<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ScChA..58.2531L">2015ScChA..58.2531L</a>. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11425-015-5016-2">10.1007/s11425-015-5016-2</a>. <a href="/facts/S2CID_(identifier)/ldJsHa2Y">S2CID</a> <a href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122080390">122080390</a>.</li></ul>

De Branges's theorem open-in-new

De Branges's theorem