A complex expression allows the current density J to be written as a sum of electric, magnetic, and toroidal moments using Cartesian1 or spherical2 differential operators. The lowest order toroidal term is the toroidal dipole. Its magnitude along direction i is given by
Since this term arises only in an expansion of the current density to second order, it generally vanishes in a long-wavelength approximation.
However, a recent study comes to the result that the toroidal multipole moments are not a separate multipole family, but rather higher order terms of the electric multipole moments.3
In 1957, Yakov Zel'dovich found that because the weak interaction violates parity symmetry, a spin-1/2 Dirac particle must have a toroidal dipole moment, also known as an anapole moment, in addition to the usual electric and magnetic dipoles.4 The interaction of this term is most easily understood in the non-relativistic limit, where the Hamiltonian is H ∝ − d ( σ ⋅ E ) − μ ( σ ⋅ B ) − a ( σ ⋅ ∇ × B ) , {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}\propto -d(\mathbf {\sigma } \cdot \mathbf {E} )-\mu (\mathbf {\sigma } \cdot \mathbf {B} )-a(\mathbf {\sigma } \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf {B} ),} where d, μ, and a are the electric, magnetic, and anapole moments, respectively, and σ is the vector of Pauli matrices.5
The nuclear toroidal moment of cesium was measured in 1997 by Wood et al..6
All dipole moments are vectors which can be distinguished by their differing symmetries under spatial inversion (P : r ↦ −r) and time reversal (T : t ↦ −t). Either the dipole moment stays invariant under the symmetry transformation ("+1") or it changes its direction ("−1"):
In condensed matter magnetic toroidal order can be induced by different mechanisms:7
The presence of a magnetic toroidic dipole moment T in condensed matter is due to the presence of a magnetoelectric effect: Application of a magnetic field H in the plane of a toroidal solenoid leads via the Lorentz force to an accumulation of current loops and thus to an electric polarization perpendicular to both T and H. The resulting polarization has the form Pi = εijkTjHk (with ε being the Levi-Civita symbol). The resulting magnetoelectric tensor describing the cross-correlated response is thus antisymmetric.
A phase transition to spontaneous long-range order of microscopic magnetic toroidal moments has been termed ferrotoroidicity.12 It is expected to fill the symmetry schemes of primary ferroics (phase transitions with spontaneous point symmetry breaking) with a space-odd, time-odd macroscopic order parameter. A ferrotoroidic material would exhibit domains which could be switched by an appropriate field, e.g. a magnetic field curl. Both of these hallmark properties of a ferroic state have been demonstrated in an artificial ferrotoroidic model system based on a nanomagnetic array13
The existence of ferrotoroidicity is still under debate and clear-cut evidence has not been presented yet—mostly due to the difficulty to distinguish ferrotoroidicity from antiferromagnetic order, as both have no net magnetization and the order parameter symmetry is the same.
All CPT self-conjugate particles, in particular the Majorana fermion, are forbidden from having any multipole moments other than toroidal moments.14 At tree level (i.e. without allowing loops in Feynman diagrams) an anapole-only particle interacts only with external currents, not with free-space electromagnetic fields, and the interaction cross-section diminishes as the particle velocity slows. For this reason, heavy Majorana fermions have been suggested as plausible candidates for cold dark matter.1516
Radescu, E. Jr.; Vaman, G. (2012), "Cartesian multipole expansions and tensorial identities", Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 36: 89–111, doi:10.2528/PIERB11090702 /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Dubovik, V. M.; Tugushev, V. V. (March 1990), "Toroid moments in electrodynamics and solid-state physics", Physics Reports, 187 (4): 145–202, Bibcode:1990PhR...187..145D, doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90042-Z /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
I. Fernandez-Corbaton et al.: On the dynamic toroidal multipoles from localized electric current distributions. Scientific Reports, 8 August 2017 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07474-4.pdf ↩
Zel’Dovich, I. B. (1958). Electromagnetic interaction with parity violation. Sov. Phys. JETP, 6(6), 1184-1186. ↩
Dubovik, V. M.; Kuznetsov, V. E. (1998), "The toroid moment of Majorana neutrino", Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 13 (30): 5257–5278, arXiv:hep-ph/9606258, Bibcode:1998IJMPA..13.5257D, doi:10.1142/S0217751X98002419, S2CID 14925303 /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩
Wood, C. S. (1997), "Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium", Science, 275 (5307): 1759–1763, doi:10.1126/science.275.5307.1759, PMID 9065393, S2CID 16320428. /wiki/Science_(journal) ↩
Spaldin, Nicola A.; Fiebig, Manfred; Mostovoy, Maxim (2008), "The toroidal moment in condensed-matter physics and its relation to the magnetoelectric effect" (PDF), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 20 (43): 434203, Bibcode:2008JPCM...20Q4203S, doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/43/434203, S2CID 53455483. /wiki/Nicola_Spaldin ↩
Ederer, Claude; Spaldin, Nicola A. (2007), "Towards a microscopic theory of toroidal moments in bulk periodic crystals", Physical Review B, 76 (21): 214404, arXiv:0706.1974, Bibcode:2007PhRvB..76u4404E, doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.214404, S2CID 55003368. /wiki/Nicola_Spaldin ↩
Scagnoli, V.; Staub, U.; Bodenthin, Y.; de Souza, R. A.; Garcia-Fernandez, M.; Garganourakis, M.; Boothroyd, A. T.; Prabhakaran, D.; Lovesey, S. W. (2011), "Observation of orbital currents in CuO", Science, 332 (6030): 696–698, Bibcode:2011Sci...332..696S, doi:10.1126/science.1201061, PMID 21474711, S2CID 206531474. /wiki/Science_(journal) ↩
Varma, C. M. (2006), "Theory of the pseudogap state of the cuprates", Physical Review B, 73 (15): 155113, arXiv:cond-mat/0507214, Bibcode:2006PhRvB..73o5113V, doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.155113, S2CID 119370367. /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩
Fauqué, B.; Sidis, Y.; Hinkov, V.; Pailhès, S.; Lin, C. T.; Chaud, X.; Bourges, P. (2006), "Magnetic order in the pseudogap phase of high-TC superconductors", Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (19): 197001, arXiv:cond-mat/0509210, Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96s7001F, doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.197001, PMID 16803131, S2CID 17857703. /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩
Gnewuch, Stephanie; Rodriguez, Efrain E. (1 March 2019). "The fourth ferroic order: Current status on ferrotoroidic materials". Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 271: 175–190. doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2018.12.035. ISSN 0022-4596. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022459618305760 ↩
Lehmann, Jannis; Donnelly, Claire; Derlet, Peter M.; Heyderman, Laura J.; Fiebig, Manfred (2019), "Poling of an artificial magneto-toroidal crystal", Nature Nanotechnology, 14 (2): 141–144, doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0321-x, hdl:20.500.11850/310648, PMID 30531991, S2CID 54474479. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Boudjema, F.; Hamzaoui, C.; Rahal, V.; Ren, H. C. (1989), "Electromagnetic properties of generalized Majorana particles", Phys. Rev. Lett., 62 (8): 852–854, Bibcode:1989PhRvL..62..852B, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.852, PMID 10040354 /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
Ho, C. M.; Scherrer, R. J. (2013), "Anapole dark matter", Phys. Lett. B, 722 (8): 341–346, arXiv:1211.0503, Bibcode:2013PhLB..722..341H, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.039, S2CID 15472526 /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩
"New, simple theory may explain mysterious dark matter". Vanderbilt University. 2013. http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2013/06/dark-matter/ ↩