Considering observations in the form of co-occurrences ( w , d ) {\displaystyle (w,d)} of words and documents, PLSA models the probability of each co-occurrence as a mixture of conditionally independent multinomial distributions:
with c {\displaystyle c} being the words' topic. Note that the number of topics is a hyperparameter that must be chosen in advance and is not estimated from the data. The first formulation is the symmetric formulation, where w {\displaystyle w} and d {\displaystyle d} are both generated from the latent class c {\displaystyle c} in similar ways (using the conditional probabilities P ( d | c ) {\displaystyle P(d|c)} and P ( w | c ) {\displaystyle P(w|c)} ), whereas the second formulation is the asymmetric formulation, where, for each document d {\displaystyle d} , a latent class is chosen conditionally to the document according to P ( c | d ) {\displaystyle P(c|d)} , and a word is then generated from that class according to P ( w | c ) {\displaystyle P(w|c)} . Although we have used words and documents in this example, the co-occurrence of any couple of discrete variables may be modelled in exactly the same way.
So, the number of parameters is equal to c d + w c {\displaystyle cd+wc} . The number of parameters grows linearly with the number of documents. In addition, although PLSA is a generative model of the documents in the collection it is estimated on, it is not a generative model of new documents.
Their parameters are learned using the EM algorithm.
PLSA may be used in a discriminative setting, via Fisher kernels.1
PLSA has applications in information retrieval and filtering, natural language processing, machine learning from text, bioinformatics,2 and related areas.
It is reported that the aspect model used in the probabilistic latent semantic analysis has severe overfitting problems.3
This is an example of a latent class model (see references therein), and it is related67 to non-negative matrix factorization. The present terminology was coined in 1999 by Thomas Hofmann.8
Thomas Hofmann, Learning the Similarity of Documents : an information-geometric approach to document retrieval and categorization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, pp-914-920, MIT Press, 2000 https://papers.nips.cc/paper/1654-learning-the-similarity-of-documents-an-information-geometric-approach-to-document-retrieval-and-categorization.pdf ↩
Pinoli, Pietro; et, al. (2013). "Enhanced probabilistic latent semantic analysis with weighting schemes to predict genomic annotations". Proceedings of IEEE BIBE 2013. The 13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering. IEEE. pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/BIBE.2013.6701702. ISBN 978-147993163-7. 978-147993163-7 ↩
Blei, David M.; Andrew Y. Ng; Michael I. Jordan (2003). "Latent Dirichlet Allocation" (PDF). Journal of Machine Learning Research. 3: 993–1022. doi:10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993. http://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume3/blei03a/blei03a.pdf ↩
Alexei Vinokourov and Mark Girolami, A Probabilistic Framework for the Hierarchic Organisation and Classification of Document Collections, in Information Processing and Management, 2002 http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/rd/30973750,455249,1,0.25,Download/http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/22961/http:zSzzSzcis.paisley.ac.ukzSzvino-ci0zSzvinokourov_masha.pdf/vinokourov02probabilistic.pdf ↩
Eric Gaussier, Cyril Goutte, Kris Popat and Francine Chen, A Hierarchical Model for Clustering and Categorising Documents Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine, in "Advances in Information Retrieval -- Proceedings of the 24th BCS-IRSG European Colloquium on IR Research (ECIR-02)", 2002 http://www.xrce.xerox.com/Research-Development/Publications/2002-004 ↩
Chris Ding, Tao Li, Wei Peng (2006). "Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing: Equivalence Chi-Square Statistic, and a Hybrid Method. AAAI 2006" http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2006/AAAI06-055.pdf ↩
Chris Ding, Tao Li, Wei Peng (2008). "On the equivalence between Non-negative Matrix Factorization and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing" http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947308000145 ↩
Thomas Hofmann, Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual International SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR-99), 1999 https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6705 ↩