Self access language learning promotes the approach where students study independently choosing from among different resources that are available. The theory behind this style of learning is that students, especially foreign language students, learn better if they have a say in how they learn.1 Self-access language learning is closely related to learner-centered approach, learner autonomy and self-directed learning as all focus on student responsibility and active participation for his/her own learning.2 This style of instruction is most often done in the setting of a self-contained learning environment or self-access center.
Self-access centers can be as simple as a classroom set aside with dictionaries and shelves of paper-based exercises to state-of-the-art digital centers with various types of computer- and Internet-based resources. What resources are available and how students are guided to use them depend on the financial resources available and how much learner autonomy an institution decides to give students.3
Some of the advantages of this form of learning is that students at the very least set the pace of their work. Depending on the individual center, students can also set the level and content of their work. Students can use these centers voluntarily or can have assignments to complete there. The major advantage, therefore, is flexibility, with the purpose of giving the students themselves the opportunity to tailor the course more to their learning needs and styles than a more traditional mode of teaching.6
Use of multiple technologies in a more independent setting has been shown to improve motivation and increase students’ ability to work independently by taking more responsibility for their own learning. Students also report feeling more "empowered" by such modes of instruction.7
The major disadvantages of this mode has basically to do with the ability of both students and teachers to adapt and integrate this method effectively. Many students are not used to working independently, creating the need to provide guidance as to the use of this kind of center, at least in the beginning.8 One study reports that students do not seem to want too much freedom in their use of technology. 73% reported that they preferred a regularly scheduled lab time, with the facilitative presence of a teacher. Significantly less than half reported that they preferred completely free access to the lab or to do work at home on their own computer.9
For teachers, the 'letting go' of control can be equally disorienting and it may seem that giving students such control depreciates teachers' skills and experience.10 Traditionally, teachers are used to being the center of student activity, controlling how, when and why students do what they do. Students have been expected to work in "lock-step" with the teacher orchestrating what students do to a very high degree. Teachers, in turn, rely on textbooks that allow little variation. Use of self-access center materials steer students way from the rigidity and "security" of this paradigm, causing teachers to lose their "all-powerful" and "all-knowing" position. This can cause problems integrating a self-access center due to political and institutional constraints.11
Other possible problems have to do with availability of physical resources.12
Klassen, Johanna (1998). "Does Self-Access Language Learning at the Tertiary Level Really Work?". http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ajelt/vol8/art4.htm ↩
Carter, Beverly-Anne (Fall 1999). "Begin with Beliefs: Exploring the Relationship between Beliefs and Learner Autonomy among Advanced Students". Texas Papers in Foreign and Second Language Learning and Teaching. 4 (1): 1–20. ED 467863 (ERIC). ↩
Rodden, Michael (2007). "Self-Access: A framework for diversity". Archived from the original on 2007-08-17. https://web.archive.org/web/20070817093215/http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/resources/self_access.shtml ↩
Hsu, Jeng-yih (May 6, 2007). "Integrating a Writing-across-curriculum Program into a Self-access Learning Center.". Proceedings of the 24th Conference on English Teaching and Learning. Taiwan: ERIC 496122. ↩
Singleton, Malinda (October 1, 2006). "Continuous learning: new Language Learning Center enhances Air Force linguists skills". Spokesman Magazine. Archived from the original on May 16, 2011. Retrieved 2007-09-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20110516204601/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-153518693.html ↩
Stepp-Greany, Jonita (January 1, 2002). "Student Perceptions On Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millennium". Language, Learning & Technology. 6 (1): 165. Retrieved 2007-09-05. https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-82135559 ↩
Johnson, Frances; Delarche, Marion; Marshall, Nicholas; Wurr, Adrian; Edwards, Jeffrey (Spring 1998). "Changing Teachers Roles in the Foreign Language Classroom". Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education. 3 (2): 71–89. ED423 676 (ERIC). ↩
Lai, Lai Kwan (September 1999). "A Tutor-Guided Learning Scheme in a Self-Access Centre". The Internet TESL Journal. Retrieved 2007-09-07. http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ajelt/vol8/art4.htm ↩
"English Language Self-Access Centre". Archived from the original on 2008-03-27. https://web.archive.org/web/20080327231345/http://www.elsac.auckland.ac.nz/ ↩
"My English". http://myenglish.kmutt.ac.th ↩