All the types of anisotropy are characterized by a local symmetry group, which is a point group; and the invariance under this symmetry group lead that the mechanical behavior of a material is characterized by a number of elastic constants and algebraic invariants. Specifically, a clinotropic material has a low-symmetry internal structure, whose point symmetry group has a finite order different from 2 3 {\displaystyle 2^{3}} or 2 4 {\displaystyle 2^{4}} and does not contain the Klein four-group K = Z 2 × Z 2 {\displaystyle K=\mathbb {Z} _{2}\times \mathbb {Z} _{2}} as a subgroup1. This represents the most general form of anisotropy in linear elastic media and often requires many distinct elastic constants to describe it. Unlike isotropic materials (identical properties in all directions) and orthotropic materials (distinct but constant properties along three orthogonal directions), clinotropic materials may require up to 21 independent elastic constants in their stiffness tensor (when expressed in reduced Voigt notation), reflecting the complete absence of structural symmetry in their mechanical behavior. There are several subclasses of clinotropic materials, requiring between 6 and 21 elastic constants. Clinotropic materials may exhibit trigonal symmetry (6 or 7 constants), monoclinic symmetry (13 constants), or triclinic symmetry (21 constants) 2.
This type of anisotropy is associated with materials displaying trigonal, monoclinic, and triclinic crystal symmetry, as well as certain composites, rocks, or biological tissues with highly irregular or non-homogeneous microstructures. Due to their high complexity, clinotropic models are primarily used in contexts where accurately capturing directional variability in mechanical properties is essential, such as advanced simulations of heterogeneous media or material characterization in materials science and geophysics.
Trigonal symmetry represents the clinotropic case with the highest symmetry, requiring the fewest elastic constants—six in total. For a linearly elastic trigonal clinotropic material, the stress-strain relations, using Voigt notation, are given at each point by:3
The compliance matrix (flexibility) providing the strain-stress relations has a form analogous to the stiffness matrix ( C i j {\displaystyle C_{ij}} ) above.
Monoclinic symmetry is characterized by a single reflection plane. The low degree of symmetry results in highly directionally dependent behavior, requiring 13 elastic constants in total. A linearly elastic monoclinic clinotropic material is characterized by the following stress-strain relations:4
The compliance matrix has an analogous form. Adapting the notation typically used for orthotropic materials, the compliance matrix may be written as:5
With the following constraints ensuring the matrix remains symmetric:
The independent constants may be chosen as three Young's moduli ( E 1 , E 2 , E 3 {\displaystyle E_{1},E_{2},E_{3}} ), three Poisson's ratios ( ν 12 , ν 13 , ν 23 {\displaystyle \nu _{12},\nu _{13},\nu _{23}} ), three shear moduli ( G 12 , G 13 , G 23 {\displaystyle G_{12},G_{13},G_{23}} ), and four additional constants ( α 1 , α 2 , α 3 , β 23 , {\displaystyle \alpha _{1},\alpha _{2},\alpha _{3},\beta _{23},} ), totaling 13 independent elastic constants.
This represents the highest degree of anisotropy, with a trivial symmetry group of order 2. Consequently, its stiffness matrix in Voigt notation has no zero components, requiring 21 elastic constants to define the stress-strain relations:
Zheng 1994. - Zheng, Q. S. (Nov 1994). "Theory of representations for tensor functions—a unified invariant approach to constitutive equations". Appl. Mech. Rev. 47 (11). ASME: 547–587. doi:10.1115/1.3111066. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/appliedmechanicsreviews/article-abstract/47/11/545/400823/Theory-of-Representations-for-Tensor-Functions-A?redirectedFrom=fulltext ↩
Zheng 1994, p. 556. - Zheng, Q. S. (Nov 1994). "Theory of representations for tensor functions—a unified invariant approach to constitutive equations". Appl. Mech. Rev. 47 (11). ASME: 547–587. doi:10.1115/1.3111066. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/appliedmechanicsreviews/article-abstract/47/11/545/400823/Theory-of-Representations-for-Tensor-Functions-A?redirectedFrom=fulltext ↩
Berryman, James G. (2005). "Bounds and self-consistent estimates for elastic constants of random polycrystals with hexagonal, trigonal, and tetragonal symmetries". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 53 (10): 2141–2173. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2005.05.004. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/875664-kyOLyK/ ↩
Cowin, S. C.; Mehrabadi, M. M. (1992). "The structure of the linear anisotropic elastic symmetries". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 40 (7). Elsevier: 1459–1471. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(92)90029-2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022509692900292 ↩
Boresi, A. P, Schmidt, R. J. and Sidebottom, O. M., 1993, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, Wiley. ↩