Crop water productivity (WP) or water use efficiency (WUE) expressed in kg/m³ is an efficiency term, expressing the amount of marketable product (e.g. kilograms of grain) in relation to the amount of input needed to produce that output (cubic meters of water). The water used for crop production is referred to as crop evapotranspiration. This is a combination of water lost by evaporation from the soil surface and transpiration by the plant, occurring simultaneously. Except by modeling, distinguishing between the two processes is difficult. Representative values of WUE for cereals at field level, expressed with evapotranspiration in the denominator, can vary between 0.10 and 4 kg/m3.
For certain crops, experiments confirm that deficit irrigation (DI) can increase water use efficiency without severe yield reductions. For example for winter wheat in Turkey, planned DI increased yields by 65% as compared to winter wheat under rainfed cultivation, and had double the water use efficiency as compared to rainfed and fully irrigated winter wheat. Similar positive results have been described for cotton. Experiments in Turkey and India indicated that the irrigation water use for cotton could be reduced to up to 60 percent of the total crop water requirement with limited yield losses. In this way, high water productivity and a better nutrient-water balance was obtained.
For other crops, the application of deficit irrigation will result in a lower water use efficiency and yield. This is the case when crops are sensitive to drought stress throughout the complete season, such as maize.
Apart from university research groups and farmers associations, international organizations such as FAO, ICARDA, IWMI and the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food are studying DI.
If crops have certain phenological phases in which they are tolerant to water stress, DI can increase the ratio of yield over crop water consumption (evapotranspiration) by either reducing the water loss by unproductive evaporation, and/or by
increasing the proportion of marketable yield to the totally produced biomass (harvest index), and/or by increasing the proportion of total biomass production to transpiration due to hardening of the crop - although this effect is very limited due to the conservative relation between biomass production and crop transpiration, - and/or due to adequate fertilizer application and/or by avoiding bad agronomic conditions during crop growth, such as water logging in the root zone, pests and diseases, etc.
Field experimentation is necessary for correct application of DI for a particular crop in a particular region. In addition, simulation of the soil water balance and related crop growth (crop water productivity modeling) can be a valuable decision support tool. By conjunctively simulating the effects of different influencing factors (climate, soil, management, crop characteristics) on crop production, models allow to (1) better understand the mechanism behind improved water use efficiency, to (2) schedule the necessary irrigation applications during the drought sensitive crop growth stages, considering the possible variability in climate, to (3) test DI strategies of specific crops in new regions, and to (4) investigate the effects of future climate scenarios or scenarios of altered management practices on crop production.
English, M., (1990). Deficit Irrigation. I: Analytical Framework. J. Irrig. Drain. E.-ASCE 116, 399-412. https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1990)116:3(399)
Fereres, E., Soriano, M.A., (2007).Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J. Exp. Bot. 58, 147-158 https://web.archive.org/web/20070710212325/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/58/2/147
Kipkorir, E.C., Raes, D., Labadie, J., (2001). Optimal allocation of short-term irrigation supply. Irrig. Drain. Syst. 15, 247-267.
Geerts, S., Raes, D., (2009). Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric. Water Manage 96, 1275-1284 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.009
Kijne, J.W., Barker, R., Molden, D., (2003). Improving water productivity in agriculture: editor's overview. In: Kijne, J.W., Barker, R.M.D. (eds.), Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. Archived 2007-07-17 at the Wayback Machine International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, p. xi-xix. http://www.cabi.org/bk_BookDisplay.asp?SubjectArea=&Subject=&PID=1626
Zwart, S.J., Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., (2004). Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agric. Water Manage 69, 115-133. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.04.007
Ilbeyi, A., Ustun, H., Oweis, T., Pala, M., Benli, B., (2006). Wheat water productivity and yield in a cool highland environment: Effect of early sowing with supplemental irrigation. Agric. Water Manage 82, 399-410. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.08.005
Raes, D., Geerts, S., Vandersypen, K., (2008). More Food, Less Water. In: Raymaekers, B. (ed.), Lectures for the XXIst century. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium, p. 81-101.
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Vacher, J., Mamani, R., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., Morales, B., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J., Taboada, C., (2008). Introducing deficit irrigation to stabilize yields of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd. '). Eur. J. Agron. 28, 427-436. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.008
Spreer, W., Ongprasert, S., Hegele, M., Wünnsche, J. N., Müller, J. (2009). Yield and fruit development in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) under different irrigation regimes. Agric. Water Manage 96, 574-584. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.020
USDA 2010 https://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2010/100114.htm
"New Farming Wrinkle May Help Peanut Growers". USDA Agricultural Research Service. January 14, 2010. https://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2010/100114.htm
Pandey, R.K., Maranville, J.W., Admou, A., (2000). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment. I. Grain yield and yield components. Agric. Water Manage. 46, 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00073-1
Geerts, S., Raes, D., (2009). Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric. Water Manage 96, 1275-1284 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.009
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E., (2007) On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity. Irrig. Sci. 25, 189-207. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0064-1
Steduto, P., Albrizio, R., (2005). Resource use efficiency of field-grown sunflower, sorghum, wheat and chickpea. II. Water use efficiency and comparison with radiation use efficiency. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 130, 269-281. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.04.003
Pereira, L.S., Oweis, T., Zairi, A., (2002). Irrigation management under water scarcity. Agric. Water Manage 57, 175-206. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00075-6
Ünlü, M., Kanber, R., Senyigit, U., Onaran, H., Diker, K., (2006). Trickle and sprinkler irrigation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the middle Anatolian region in Turkey. Agric. Water Manage 79, 43-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.02.004
Pandey, R.K., Maranville, J.W., Chetima, M.M., (2000). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment. II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agric. Water Manage 46, 15-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00074-3
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., (2008). Indicators to quantify the flexible phenology of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd. ) in response to drought stress. Field Crop. Res. 108, 150-156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.04.008
Hsiao, T.C., (1973). Plant Responses to Water Stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24, 519-570.
Kirda, C., (2002). Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. In: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (ed.), Deficit irrigation practices. Rome, Italy, p. 3-10. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y3655E/y3655e00.htm
Zhang, H., (2003). Improving water productivity through deficit irrigation: examples from Syria, the North China Plain and Oregon, USA. In: Kijne, J.W., Barker, R., Molden, D. (eds.), Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. Archived 2007-07-17 at the Wayback Machine International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, p. 301-309. http://www.cabi.org/bk_BookDisplay.asp?SubjectArea=&Subject=&PID=1626
Zhang, H., Oweis, T., (1999). Water-yield relations and optimal irrigation scheduling of wheat in the Mediterranean region. Agric. Water Manage 38, 195-211. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00069-9
Kang, S., Zhang, L., Liang, Y., Hu, X., Cai, H., Gu, B., (2002). Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manage 55, 203-216. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00180-9
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Condori, O., Mamani, J., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J., Taboada, C., Vacher, J., (2008). Could deficit irrigation be a sustainable practice for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Southern Bolivian Altiplano? Agric. Water Manage 95, 909-917. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.012
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E. (2009) AquaCrop--The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description. Agron. J. 101, 438-447. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0140s
Steduto, P, Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D., Fereres, E. (2009). AquaCrop--The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles. Agron. J. 101, 426-437. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0139s