Citation creators or citation generators are online tools which facilitate the creation of works cited and bibliographies. Citation creators use web forms to take input and format the output according to guidelines and standards, such as the Modern Language Association's MLA Style Manual, American Psychological Association's APA style, The Chicago Manual of Style, or Turabian format. Some citation creators generate only run-time output, while others store the citation data for later use.
In 2013, a comparison of usage of EndNote, RefWorks, and Zotero among the legal scholars at the Oxford University Law Faculty was performed by survey. 0% of survey participants used RefWorks; 40% used Endnote; 17% used Zotero, mostly research students. The difficulty of using RefWorks, Endnote, and Zotero by Oxford legal scholars was estimated by the author as well. A comparison of these tools for legal scholars was made across several usage scenarios, including: installing and setting up OSCOLA citation style; building a personal legal bibliographic library and using extracting metadata from legal bibliographic databases; generating footnotes and bibliographies for academic publications; using and modifying OSCOLA citation style.2 In the same year, a survey conducted at the University of Turin found that knowledge of software was high but adoption was not, and the most known and used software was EndNote.3
For example: "Z39.50 Gateway to Library Catalogs". Library of Congress. Retrieved 2023-05-08. And: "Z-BRARY – Directory of Z39.50 and SRU Targets". z-brary.com. Retrieved 2023-05-08. https://www.loc.gov/z3950/ ↩
Meredith, Sandra (2013-01-21). "Critical review of referencing software when used with OSCOLA". European Journal of Law and Technology. 4 (1). doi:10.2139/ssrn.2184098. ISSN 2042-115X. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Francese, Enrico (2013). "Usage of Reference Management Software at the University of Torino". JLIS.it. 4 (2). University of Florence. doi:10.4403/jlis.it-8679. Retrieved 2022-06-04. https://www.jlis.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/244 ↩