This line has been called the amphoteric line,2 the metal-nonmetal line,3 the metalloid line,45 the semimetal line,6 or the staircase.78 While it has also been called the Zintl border9 or the Zintl line1011 these terms instead refer to a vertical line sometimes drawn between groups 13 and 14. This particular line was named by Laves in 1941.12 It differentiates group 13 elements from those in and to the right of group 14. The former generally combine with electropositive metals to make intermetallic compounds whereas the latter usually form salt-like compounds.13
References to a dividing line between metals and nonmetals appear in the literature as far back as at least 1869.14 In 1891, Walker published a periodic "tabulation" with a diagonal straight line drawn between the metals and the nonmetals.15 In 1906, Alexander Smith published a periodic table with a zigzag line separating the nonmetals from the rest of elements, in his highly influential16 textbook Introduction to General Inorganic Chemistry.17 In 1923, Horace G. Deming, an American chemist, published short (Mendeleev style) and medium (18-column) form periodic tables.18 Each one had a regular stepped line separating metals from nonmetals. Merck and Company prepared a handout form of Deming's 18-column table, in 1928, which was widely circulated in American schools. By the 1930s Deming's table was appearing in handbooks and encyclopaedias of chemistry. It was also distributed for many years by the Sargent-Welch Scientific Company.192021
A dividing line between metals and nonmetals is sometimes replaced by two dividing lines. One line separates metals and metalloids; the other metalloids and nonmetals.2223
Mendeleev wrote that, "It is, however, impossible to draw a strict line of demarcation between metals and nonmetals, there being many intermediate substances".242526 Several other sources note confusion or ambiguity as to the location of the dividing line;2728 suggest its apparent arbitrariness29 provides grounds for refuting its validity;30 and comment as to its misleading, contentious or approximate nature.313233 Deming himself noted that the line could not be drawn very accurately.34
The table below distinguishes the elements whose stable allotropes at standard conditions are exclusively metallic (yellow) from those that are not. (Carbon and arsenic, which have both stable metallic and nonmetallic forms, are coloured according to their stable nonmetallic forms.)
Metallic Network covalent Molecular covalent Single atoms Unknown Background color shows bonding of simple substances in the periodic table. If there are several, the most stable allotrope is considered.
Horvath 1973, p. 336 ↩
Levy 2001, p. 158 ↩
Tarendash 2001, p. 78 ↩
Thompson 1999 ↩
DiSalvo 2000, p. 1800 ↩
Whitley 2009 ↩
Sacks[7] described the dividing line as, 'A jagged line, like Hadrian's Wall ... [separating] the metals from the rest, with a few "semimetals", metalloids—arsenic, selenium—straddling the wall.' ↩
King 2005, p. 6006 ↩
Herchenroeder & Gschneidner 1988 ↩
De Graef & McHenry 2007, p. 34 ↩
Kniep 1996, p. xix ↩
Nordell & Miller 1999, p. 579 ↩
Hinrichs 1869, p. 115. In his article Hinrichs included a periodic table, organized by atomic weight, but this did not show a metal-nonmetal dividing line. Rather, he wrote that, "... elements of like properties or their compounds of like properties, form groups bounded by simple lines. Thus a line drawn through C, As, Te, separates the elements, having metallic lustre from those not having such lustre. The gaseous elements form a small group by themselves, the condensible [sic] chlorine forming the boundary ... So also the boundary lines for other properties may be drawn." ↩
Walker 1891, p. 252 ↩
Miles & Gould 1976, p. 444: "His 'Introduction to General Inorganic Chemistry,' 1906, was one of the most important textbooks in the field during the first quarter of the twentieth century." ↩
Smith 1906, pp. 408, 410 ↩
Deming 1923, pp. 160, 165 ↩
Abraham, Coshow & Fix, W 1994, p. 3 ↩
Emsley 1985, p. 36 ↩
Fluck 1988, p. 432 ↩
Brown & Holme 2006, p. 57 ↩
Swenson 2005 ↩
Mendeléeff 1897, p. 23 ↩
In the context of Mendeleev's observation, Glinka[24] adds that: "In classing an element as a metal or a nonmetal we only indicate which of its properties—metallic or nonmetallic—are more pronounced in it". ↩
Mendeleev regarded tellurium as such an intermediate substance: '... it is a bad conductor of heat and electricity, and in this respect, as in many others, it forms a transition from the metals to the nonmetals.'[25] ↩
MacKay & MacKay 1989, p. 24 ↩
Norman 1997, p. 31 ↩
Whitten, Davis & Peck 2003, p. 1140 ↩
Roher 2001, pp. 4–6 ↩
Hawkes 2001, p. 1686 ↩
Kotz, Treichel & Weaver 2005, pp. 79–80 ↩
Housecroft & Constable 2006, p. 322 ↩
Deming 1923, p. 381 ↩