Elliptical wing

<h2 id="properties">Properties</h2>
Theoretically, the most efficient way to create lift is to generate it in an elliptical spanwise distribution across the wing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:1" href="#fn:1">1</a> There is no inherent superiority to pure elliptical shapes and wings with other planforms can be optimized to give elliptical spanwise lift distributions.
The basic elliptical wing shape has disadvantages:

<ul><li>The almost uniform <a href="/facts/Lift_(force)/ehQKKaWP">lift</a> distribution of a constant-aerofoil section elliptical wing can cause the entire span of the wing to <a href="/facts/Stall_(flight)/nsB7YRc5">stall</a> simultaneously, potentially causing loss of control with little warning. To improve the stalling characteristics and give the pilot some warning, designers use a non-uniform aerofoil. For example, the wing of the <a href="/facts/Supermarine_Spitfire/7qD9ujY6">Supermarine Spitfire</a> was both thinned towards the tips and twisted to give <a href="/facts/Washout_(aviation)/44a979vS">washout</a>, reducing the load on the tips so that the inner wing would stall first.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2">2</a><a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3">3</a> Such compromises depart from the theoretical elliptical lift distribution, increasing induced drag. An elliptical spanwise lift distribution cannot be achieved by an untwisted wing with an elliptical planform because there is a logarithmic term in the lift distribution that becomes important near the wing tips. <a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4">4</a></li>
<li>Elliptical wing planforms are more difficult to manufacture.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5">5</a> In it, either leading edge or trailing edge or both are curved, and the ribs change in a non uniform way along the wingspan. In practice, most elliptical wings are approximations, for example several sections of the Spitfire leading and trailing edges are arcs of circles.</li></ul>
<h2 id="the-semi-elliptical-wing">The semi-elliptical wing</h2>
For a wing to have an elliptical area distribution, it is not necessary for both the leading and trailing edges to be curved. If one of these is straight, as in the semi-elliptical planform, the wing may still have an elliptical area distribution. Several aircraft of this type have been produced; one of the most successful being the American <a href="/facts/Seversky_P-35/WbRLAw5r">Seversky P-35</a>.
During the <a href="/facts/Postwar/jWtelFTY">postwar</a> era, the semi-elliptical wing profile was extensively studied for its <a href="/facts/Ground_effect_(aerodynamics)/NBIBTAlw">ground effect</a> properties; it was postulated that it would be suitable for <a href="/facts/Ground-effect_vehicle/NoE8NteE">ground-effect vehicles</a> (which operate close to the water, in ground effect, to avoid the higher induced drag that occurs out of ground effect). The low level of induced drag produced by a semi-elliptical wing would be beneficial for these vehicles.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6">6</a>

<h2 id="history">History</h2>
The British theoretical aerodynamicist Frederick Lanchester was perhaps the first person to write in detail about the elliptical wing, having done so during 1907.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7">7</a> <a href="/facts/Ludwig_Prandtl/I4b4E7sq">Ludwig Prandtl</a> independently rediscovered this in <a href="/facts/Lifting-line_theory/HPNRRRM5">Lifting-line theory</a> (1917–1918). Despite this head-start, the elliptical wing was initially viewed as more a theoretical concept than one for practical application, in part due to the overriding needs to compromise between an aircraft aerodynamic properties and its other design aspects. It would be quite some time before practical use of the <a href="/facts/Planform/xc9IENhM">planform</a> would be made.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8">8</a>

The first aircraft to use the elliptical wing was the <a href="/facts/B%C3%A4umer_Sausewind/TlAUx06t">Bäumer Sausewind</a>, a German light sports aircraft that performed its <a href="/facts/Maiden_flight/LW569ILn">maiden flight</a> on 26 May 1925. Its designers, the Günther brothers, later joined the German aircraft manufacturer <a href="/facts/Heinkel/FsfGW8Ta">Heinkel</a> to apply their designs, including the elliptical wing, to several projects undertaken by the firm.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:9" href="#fn:9">9</a> During the early 1930s, Heinkel developed a fast <a href="/facts/Mail_plane/VIR5uW30">mail plane</a> and <a href="/facts/Reconnaissance/WbBwMhqs">reconnaissance</a> <a href="/facts/Bomber/YKEYbswu">bomber</a>, the <a href="/facts/Heinkel_He_70/HsJE77FB">Heinkel He 70</a> "Blitz", which had the elliptical wing. It proved to have excellent performance for the era, establishing eight world records relating to speed over distance, having reportedly attained a maximum speed of {377 km/h (234 mph).<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:10" href="#fn:10">10</a>
Shortly thereafter, Heinkel developed the <a href="/facts/He_111/b3Gpp9rc">He 111</a> bomber, which made its first flight on 24 February 1935. In comparison to the He 70, it was a larger aircraft that masqueraded as a civil <a href="/facts/Airliner/mhhg0xRy">airliner</a> despite having been developed from conception to provide the nascent <a href="/facts/Luftwaffe/k7PAsBlo">Luftwaffe</a> with a fast <a href="/facts/Medium_bomber/M9NEt09w">medium bomber</a>; this deception was due to restrictions placed on Germany after the <a href="/facts/First_World_War/vITTUanQ">First World War</a> over the development or deployment of bomber aircraft.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:11" href="#fn:11">11</a> Despite the type being produced in vast numbers before and during the <a href="/facts/Second_World_War/2efV5L1U">Second World War</a>, only the early production models of the He 111 were equipped with an elliptical wing.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:12" href="#fn:12">12</a> The chief reason for dropping the elliptical wing in favour of one with straight <a href="/facts/Leading_edge/7qs3oRtP">leading</a> and <a href="/facts/Trailing_edge/ymBLLVBl">trailing edges</a> was economic, the latter design could be manufactured with greater efficiency.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:13" href="#fn:13">13</a>
Perhaps the aircraft company most commonly associated with the elliptical wing was the British manufacturer <a href="/facts/Supermarine/bAhSgolj">Supermarine</a>. During the early 1920s, the company's chief designer, <a href="/facts/Reginald_Mitchell/qv5soHRW">Reginald Mitchell</a>, had developed the <a href="/facts/Supermarine_S.4/W6YqYMbj">Supermarine S.4</a>, a British elliptical wing racing <a href="/facts/Seaplane/kKKu3sEF">seaplane</a>; it conducted its first flight during 1924. While the S.4's successors featured a wing designed by a different designer, Mitchell remained a proponent of the planform.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:14" href="#fn:14">14</a> By 1934, Mitchell and his design staff were working a new fighter aircraft for the <a href="/facts/Royal_Air_Force/P10CbL5H">Royal Air Force</a>. They decided to use a semi-elliptical wing shape to solve two conflicting requirements; the wing needed to be thin to allow a high <a href="/facts/Critical_Mach_number/3gEq0nyu">critical Mach number</a> but it had to be thick enough to house the retractable undercarriage, armament, and ammunition. An elliptical planform is the most efficient aerodynamic shape for an untwisted wing, leading to the lowest amount of <a href="/facts/Induced_drag/qJ61p5cR">induced drag</a>. The semi-elliptical planform was skewed so that the centre of pressure, which occurs near the quarter-<a href="/facts/Chord_(aircraft)/LoHjGUvP">chord</a> position at all but the highest speeds, was close to the main spar, preventing the wings from twisting. The Spitfire conducted its maiden flight on 5 March 1936.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:15" href="#fn:15">15</a>

Mitchell has sometimes been accused of copying the wing shape of Heinkel's He 70. Communications between Ernest Heinkel and Mitchell during the 1930s establishes Mitchell's awareness of the He 70 and its performance.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:16" href="#fn:16">16</a> <a href="/facts/Beverley_Shenstone/eFlDtlM9">Beverley Shenstone</a>, the <a href="/facts/Aerodynamicist/Cn6Lnl3H">aerodynamicist</a> on Mitchell's team, observed that: "Our wing was much thinner and had quite a different section to that of the Heinkel. In any case, it would have been simply asking for trouble to have copied a wing shape from an aircraft designed for an entirely different purpose".<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:17" href="#fn:17">17</a>
Almost all <a href="/facts/Republic_P-47_Thunderbolt/LkmsR6l1">Republic P-47 Thunderbolts</a>, an <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">American</a> fighter aircraft, were outfitted with elliptical wings; only the last production models differed, with squared-off wingtips, akin to the low-altitude Spitfire variants.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:18" href="#fn:18">18</a> The <a href="/facts/Aichi_D3A/97QCWtx8">Aichi D3A</a>, a Japanese dive bomber operated by the <a href="/facts/Imperial_Japanese_Navy_Air_Service/yh2l2jHl">Imperial Japanese Navy</a>, also had an elliptical wing that bore considerable similarity to that of the He 70.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:19" href="#fn:19">19</a> The <a href="/facts/Mitsubishi_A5M/IsrMsRjC">Mitsubishi A5M</a> fighter also used an elliptical wing design.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:20" href="#fn:20">20</a> Several other types had planforms which differed relatively little from the elliptical. The <a href="/facts/Hawker_Tempest_II/p5SuQfG3">Hawker Tempest II</a> fighter, which evolved into the <a href="/facts/Hawker_Sea_Fury/derjE6rs">Hawker Fury</a> and <a href="/facts/Hawker_Sea_Fury/derjE6rs">Hawker Sea Fury</a>, also used a near-elliptical wing planform, although squared off at the tips.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:21" href="#fn:21">21</a><a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:22" href="#fn:22">22</a>
Since 2009, the British aircraft company <a href="/facts/Swift_Aircraft/4jSYnM8d">Swift Aircraft</a> have been reportedly developing a two-seater <a href="/facts/Very_Light_Aircraft/101tC4oH">Very Light Aircraft</a>, <a href="/facts/Light-sport_aircraft/l9cLbYhJ">Light-sport aircraft</a> and CS-23 category aircraft, the <a href="/facts/Swift_Aircraft_Swift/YSfVdPLR">Swift Aircraft Swift</a>, which has elliptical wings.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:23" href="#fn:23">23</a>

<h3>Citations</h3>

<h3>Bibliography</h3>

<ul><li><a href="/facts/L._J._Clancy/6xTu8Llt">Clancy, L. J.</a> Aerodynamics. Pitman Publishing Limited, London. 1975. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-273-01120-0.</li>
<li>Donald, David, ed. (1999). <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=WxthNQAACAAJ">The Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft</a> (illustrated, revised ed.). London: Aurum. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 1-85410-642-2.</li>
<li>Ethell, Jeffrey L. and Steve Pace. Spitfire. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International, 1997. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-7603-0300-2.</li>
<li>Francillon, René J. Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War. London: Putnam & Company Ltd., 1970 (2nd edition 1979). <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-370-30251-6.</li>
<li>Glancey, Jonathan. Spitfire: The Illustrated Biography. London: Atlantic Books, 2006. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-1-84354-528-6.</li>
<li>Mason, Francis K. The Hawker Tempest I–IV (Aircraft in Profile Number 197). Leatherhead, Surrey, UK: Profile Publications Ltd., 1967.</li>
<li>McCormick, Barnes W. Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-471-03032-5. pp. 135–139.</li>
<li>Milne-Thomson, L.M. Theoretical Aerodynamics, 4th Ed., Dover Publications Inc, New York, 1966/1973. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 0-486-61980-X. pp. 208–209.</li>
<li>Price, Alfred. The Spitfire Story: Revised second edition. Enderby, Leicester, UK: Siverdale Books, 2002. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-1-84425-819-2.</li>
<li>Thomas, Chris and Christopher Shores. The Typhoon and Tempest Story. London: Arms and Armour Press, 1988. <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-0-85368-878-5.</li></ul>

<h2 id="further-reading">Further reading</h2>
<ul><li>Green, William; Swanborough, Gordon (August–November 1982). "The Zero Precursor...Mitsubishi's A5M". <a href="/facts/Air_Enthusiast/nwFyK41v">Air Enthusiast</a>. No. 19. pp. 26–43.</li>
<li>Regnat, Karl-Heinz (2004), Black Cross Volume 4: Heinkel He 111, Hersham, Surrey, UK: Midland Publishers, <a href="/facts/ISBN_(identifier)/15AdSPa9">ISBN</a> 978-1-85780-184-2</li></ul>
<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>
<ul><li><a href="https://www.aerosociety.com/media/4843/the-spitfire-wing-planform-a-suggestion.pdf">The Spitfire Wing Planform: A Suggestion</a> via aerosociety.com</li>
<li><a href="https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/induced-drag-coefficient/">Induced Drag Coefficient</a> via grc.nasa.gov</li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1">Clancy 1975, sections 5.17, 5.25 and 8.14. <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:2">"Spitfire"", Aeroplane icons No. 14, Kelsey, 2013, p. 33. <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:3">Smith, J. "The development of the Spitfire and Seafire". Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1947, p. 343. <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:4">Jordan, P.F. "On Lifting Wings with Parabolic Tips." ZAMM, 54, 1974. pp. 463-477. <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:5">Knauff, Thomas (24 October 2012). The Glider Flying Handbook. BookBaby. ISBN 978-1-62488-139-8. <a href="978-1-62488-139-8" target="_blank">978-1-62488-139-8</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:6">Mamada, Hiroshi; Ando, Shigenori (May 1974). "Minimum Induced Drag of Semi-Elliptic Ground Effect Wing". Journal of Aircraft. 11 (5): 257–258. doi:10.2514/3.59236. <a href="https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/3.59236?journalCode=ja" target="_blank">https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/3.59236?journalCode=ja</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:7">Garrison, Peter (February 2019). "The Perfect Airplane Wing". Air & Space Magazine. <a href="https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/" target="_blank">https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:8">Garrison, Peter (February 2019). "The Perfect Airplane Wing". Air & Space Magazine. <a href="https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/" target="_blank">https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/</a> <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:9">Mackay 2003, p. 7. <a href="#fnref:9" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:10">Donald 1999, p. 494. - Donald, David, ed. (1999). The Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft (illustrated, revised ed.). London: Aurum. ISBN 1-85410-642-2. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=WxthNQAACAAJ" target="_blank">https://books.google.com/books?id=WxthNQAACAAJ</a> <a href="#fnref:10" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:11">Mackay 2003, p. 7. <a href="#fnref:11" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:12">Mackay 2003, p. 9. <a href="#fnref:12" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:13">Regnat 2004 p. 31. <a href="#fnref:13" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:14">Ethel 1997, p. 12. <a href="#fnref:14" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:15">Ethel 1997, p. 12. <a href="#fnref:15" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:16">Garrison, Peter (February 2019). "The Perfect Airplane Wing". Air & Space Magazine. <a href="https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/" target="_blank">https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/</a> <a href="#fnref:16" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:17">Price 1977, pp. 33–34. <a href="#fnref:17" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:18">Garrison, Peter (February 2019). "The Perfect Airplane Wing". Air & Space Magazine. <a href="https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/" target="_blank">https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/perfect-airplane-wing-180971225/</a> <a href="#fnref:18" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:19">Francillon 1979, pp. 272–273. <a href="#fnref:19" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:20">Green and Swanborough 1982, p. 28. <a href="#fnref:20" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:21">Thomas and Shores 1988, p. 105. <a href="#fnref:21" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:22">Mason 1967, p. 3. <a href="#fnref:22" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
<li id="fn:23">Jackson, Paul (2011). Jane's All the World's Aircraft 2011-12. Coulsdon, Surrey: IHS Jane's. p. 596. ISBN 978-0-7106-2955-5. <a href="978-0-7106-2955-5" target="_blank">978-0-7106-2955-5</a> <a href="#fnref:23" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></li>
</ol>

Elliptical wing open-in-new

Elliptical wing