The most common definition of prolate spheroidal coordinates ( μ , ν , φ ) {\displaystyle (\mu ,\nu ,\varphi )} is
where μ {\displaystyle \mu } is a nonnegative real number and ν ∈ [ 0 , π ] {\displaystyle \nu \in [0,\pi ]} . The azimuthal angle φ {\displaystyle \varphi } belongs to the interval [ 0 , 2 π ] {\displaystyle [0,2\pi ]} .
The trigonometric identity
shows that surfaces of constant μ {\displaystyle \mu } form prolate spheroids, since they are ellipses rotated about the axis joining their foci. Similarly, the hyperbolic trigonometric identity
shows that surfaces of constant ν {\displaystyle \nu } form hyperboloids of revolution.
The distances from the foci located at ( x , y , z ) = ( 0 , 0 , ± a ) {\displaystyle (x,y,z)=(0,0,\pm a)} are
The scale factors for the elliptic coordinates ( μ , ν ) {\displaystyle (\mu ,\nu )} are equal
whereas the azimuthal scale factor is
resulting in a metric of
Consequently, an infinitesimal volume element equals
and the Laplacian can be written
Other differential operators such as ∇ ⋅ F {\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \mathbf {F} } and ∇ × F {\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {F} } can be expressed in the coordinates ( μ , ν , φ ) {\displaystyle (\mu ,\nu ,\varphi )} by substituting the scale factors into the general formulae found in orthogonal coordinates.
An alternative and geometrically intuitive set of prolate spheroidal coordinates ( σ , τ , ϕ ) {\displaystyle (\sigma ,\tau ,\phi )} are sometimes used, where σ = cosh μ {\displaystyle \sigma =\cosh \mu } and τ = cos ν {\displaystyle \tau =\cos \nu } . Hence, the curves of constant σ {\displaystyle \sigma } are prolate spheroids, whereas the curves of constant τ {\displaystyle \tau } are hyperboloids of revolution. The coordinate τ {\displaystyle \tau } belongs to the interval [−1, 1], whereas the σ {\displaystyle \sigma } coordinate must be greater than or equal to one.
The coordinates σ {\displaystyle \sigma } and τ {\displaystyle \tau } have a simple relation to the distances to the foci F 1 {\displaystyle F_{1}} and F 2 {\displaystyle F_{2}} . For any point in the plane, the sum d 1 + d 2 {\displaystyle d_{1}+d_{2}} of its distances to the foci equals 2 a σ {\displaystyle 2a\sigma } , whereas their difference d 1 − d 2 {\displaystyle d_{1}-d_{2}} equals 2 a τ {\displaystyle 2a\tau } . Thus, the distance to F 1 {\displaystyle F_{1}} is a ( σ + τ ) {\displaystyle a(\sigma +\tau )} , whereas the distance to F 2 {\displaystyle F_{2}} is a ( σ − τ ) {\displaystyle a(\sigma -\tau )} . (Recall that F 1 {\displaystyle F_{1}} and F 2 {\displaystyle F_{2}} are located at z = − a {\displaystyle z=-a} and z = + a {\displaystyle z=+a} , respectively.) This gives the following expressions for σ {\displaystyle \sigma } , τ {\displaystyle \tau } , and φ {\displaystyle \varphi } :
Unlike the analogous oblate spheroidal coordinates, the prolate spheroid coordinates (σ, τ, φ) are not degenerate; in other words, there is a unique, reversible correspondence between them and the Cartesian coordinates
The scale factors for the alternative elliptic coordinates ( σ , τ , φ ) {\displaystyle (\sigma ,\tau ,\varphi )} are
while the azimuthal scale factor is now
Hence, the infinitesimal volume element becomes
and the Laplacian equals
Other differential operators such as ∇ ⋅ F {\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \mathbf {F} } and ∇ × F {\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {F} } can be expressed in the coordinates ( σ , τ ) {\displaystyle (\sigma ,\tau )} by substituting the scale factors into the general formulae found in orthogonal coordinates.
As is the case with spherical coordinates, Laplace's equation may be solved by the method of separation of variables to yield solutions in the form of prolate spheroidal harmonics, which are convenient to use when boundary conditions are defined on a surface with a constant prolate spheroidal coordinate (See Smythe, 1968).
Lehtola, Susi (21 May 2019). "A review on non-relativistic, fully numerical electronic structure calculations on atoms and diatomic molecules". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119 (19): e25968. arXiv:1902.01431. doi:10.1002/qua.25968. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fqua.25968 ↩