For dispatchable power, this capacity depends on the internal technical capability of the plant to maintain output for a reasonable amount of time (for example, a day), neither momentarily nor permanently, and without considering external events such as lack of fuel or internal events such as maintenance.9 Actual output can be different from nameplate capacity for a number of reasons depending on equipment and circumstances.1011
For non-dispatchable power, particularly renewable energy, nameplate capacity refers to generation under ideal conditions. Output is generally limited by weather conditions, hydroelectric dam water levels, tidal variations and other outside forces. Equipment failures and maintenance usually contribute less to capacity factor reduction than the innate variation of the power source. In photovoltaics, capacity is rated under Standard Test Conditions usually expressed as watt-peak (Wp). In addition, a PV system's nameplate capacity is sometimes denoted by a subindex, for example, MWDC or MWAC, to identify the raw DC power or converted AC power output.
The term is connected with nameplates on electrical generators as these plates describing the model name and manufacturer usually also contain the rated output,12 but the rated output of a power station to the electrical grid is invariably less than the generator nameplate capacity, because the components connecting the actual generator to the grid also use power. Thus there is a distinction between component capacity and facility capacity.
Glossary of Terms in PRIS Reports. IAEA-PRIS https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/Glossary.aspx ↩
Energy glossary Energy Information Administration. Retrieved: 23 September 2010. http://www.eia.doe.gov/glossary/index.cfm?id=G#gen_nameplate ↩
Glossary. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2 August 2010. Retrieved: 23 September 2010. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/generator-nameplate-capacity.html ↩
Plant Performance Data (PPD) Archived 2010-09-10 at the Wayback Machine ICIS. Retrieved: 23 September 2010. http://www.icis.com/StaticPages/Plant_Performance_Data.htm ↩
The Future of Tantalum and Niobium Mining-Technology, 14 Jan 2010. Retrieved: 23 September 2010. https://www.mining-technology.com/features/feature74139/ ↩
Refining Capacity Alcoa, December 31, 2009. http://www.alcoa.com/alumina/en/info_page/refineries.asp ↩
Refinery Economics Archived 2010-12-28 at the Wayback Machine Natural Resources Canada, 5 january 2009. http://nrcan.gc.ca/eneene/sources/petpet/refraf-eng.php ↩
Magnificent seven Archived 2008-09-05 at the Wayback Machine Arabian Business, 17 June 2008. http://www.arabianbusiness.com/522168-magnificent-seven ↩
Kleiser, Thomas. Response to CDM page 2-4 by TÜV, 4 March 2009. Retrieved: 23 September 2010. http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/DNV-CUK1130160031.78/iProcess/TUEV-SUED1227777806.56/ReviewInitialComments/LI99J7QWQ8LUOWOBOK67F6CA1JEKFH ↩
Swain, Bibb. Designed to go above Nameplate Capacity Ethanol Producer, November 2006. Retrieved: 23 September 2010. http://www.ethanolproducer.com/article.jsp?article_id=2463 ↩
Reitze, Arnold W. Air pollution control law: compliance and enforcement page 260 George Washington University Law School, 2001. ISBN 1-58576-027-7, ISBN 978-1-58576-027-5 Retrieved: 23 September 2010. https://books.google.com/books?id=M8w5yJbNTD0C&dq=%22Nameplate+capacity%22&pg=PA260 ↩