For use on digital voice telephone systems, the DAQ reference is used. This differs from Circuit Merit in that it adds definitions for digitized voice and a static SINAD for multipath fading, using levels described in TIA/EIA TSB-88-A.6
The Circuit Merit system was developed early in the 20th Century by AT&T to quantifiably measure voice quality on the PSTN, and later adapted to include wireless telephone circuits, such as the early MTS (which was first used in 1947), IMTS and the later cellular telephone system (field trials date from 1976). It is intended to be used on a statistical basis, by collecting multiple data points (either subjective scores by human listeners, or by electronic measurements), to then produce a comprehensive report on the circuit quality. The system does not include any provision for reporting RF signal strength, and is thus inappropriate for routine use on non-telephone voice radio systems.
Circuit merit is specifically designed to report the signal-to-noise ratio7 of a communications circuit, preferably by use of electronic test equipment. See also Figure of Merit
The Circuit Merit system is also used mistakenly 89 by some amateur radio operators10 unfamiliar with its origins11 to overcome perceived inadequacies in using the R-S-T System. This belief is contrary to the published description of the R-S-T System (which uses the same number of levels for readability), and of modern (as of 2006) requirement "...that plain language be used for multi-agency, multi-jurisdiction and multi-discipline events, such as major disasters and exercises..." instead of numeric codes in radio traffic in NIMS/ICS.12 As both Circuit Merit and the R-S-T System use numbers that are often difficult for operators to map to meanings, neither complies with the intent of the NIMS plain language directive.
There is at least one plain-language voice and signal strength reporting system that does meet the NIMS plain language directive—the Plain Language Radio Checks as described in section 611 of Allied Communications Procedure 125(F): Radio Checks, Signal Strength, and Readability. The best-possible radio check report possible under this system, "LOUD AND CLEAR", is commonly used in film, television, and literature depictions of radio communications.
"Mobile Radio Estimates of Expected Coverage". http://www.telephonecollectors.info/index.php/document-repository/doc_view/9894-940-230-100-i1 ↩
Bucher, John (1991). "An Overview of Cellular Telecommunications thesis" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 18, 2017. http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a242951.pdf ↩
Arokiamary, V.Jeyasri (2009). Cellular and Mobile Communications (First ed.). 1.4 Performance Criteria: Technical Publications Pune. p. 14. ISBN 978-81-8431-585-1. Retrieved 27 March 2015.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link) 978-81-8431-585-1 ↩
Ballou, Glen (2015). Handbook for Sound Engineers. New York and London: Focal Press (Audio Engineering Society). p. 45. ↩
Federal Engineering, Inc. document. ↩
"Calculating signal to noise ratio" (PDF). http://www.bhsu.edu/Portals/91/InstrumentalAnalysis/StudyHelp/LectureNotes/Chapter5.pdf ↩
"Circuit merit silliness". http://wetnet.net/pipermail/seatcp/2011-October/011575.html ↩
"Wetnet.net discussion thread on Circuit Merit". http://wetnet.net/pipermail/seatcp/2014-May/014562.html ↩
"Signal Reporting Using the Circuit Merit System" (PDF). Information Papers. Virginia RACES, Inc. May 2004. Retrieved 2015-02-08. http://www.vistacert.org/resources/signal_quality_circuit_merit_system1.pdf ↩
"Plain Language Signal Reporting". http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php/topic,44690.0.html ↩
"Plain Language Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)" (PDF). https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/PlainLanguageFAQs.pdf ↩