Harassment is a technique used by males of many species to force females to submit to mating. It has been observed in numerous species, including mammals, birds, insects and fish. Aggression and harassment have been documented in the males of guppies (Poecilia reticulata), bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus), botos (Inia geoffrensis), dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus), Hector's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus hectori), grizzly bears, polar bears, and ungulates. It is also seen in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), red-spotted newts (Notophthalmus viridescens), and seed-eating true bugs (Neacoryphus spp.). Furthermore, it is prevalent in spider monkeys, wild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) and many other primates.
In basically all major primate taxa, aggression is used by the dominant males when herding females and keeping them away from other males. In hamadryas baboons, the males often bite the females' necks and threaten them. Wild chimpanzees can charge at females, shake branches, hit, slap, kick, pound, drag, and bite them. Orangutans are among the most forceful of mammals. Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) exhibited aggression in almost 90 percent of their copulations, including when the females were not resisting. A possible explanation for aggressive behaviors in primates is that it is a way for males to train females to be afraid of them and be more likely to surrender to future sexual advances.
Males of certain species have evolved mating behaviors in which they forcefully attempt to mate with and inseminate females, often employing grasping techniques. These male grasping devices exist to increase the duration of copulation and restrict females from mating with other males. They are in some ways a form of mate guarding. While some males have evolved different types of modifications to aid in grasping, others just grab females and attempt to force copulation.
Male waterfowl have developed another modification; while most male birds have no external genitalia, male waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) have a phallus (length 1.5–4.0 centimetres [0.59–1.57 in]). Most birds mate with the males balancing on top of the females and touching cloacas in a “cloacal kiss”; this makes forceful insemination very difficult. The phallus that male waterfowl have evolved everts out of their bodies (in a clockwise coil) and aids in inseminating females without their cooperation.
Males of many species simply grab the females and force a mating. Coercive mating is very common in water striders (Gerridae) because in most of the species, the female genitalia are often exposed and easily accessible to males. Without any courtship behavior, males initiate by forcefully trying to mount the females. Carrying the males on their backs is energetically costly to females, so they try to resist and throw off the males. The males fight back even harder and use their forelegs to tightly grasp the female's thorax and keep them from escaping. The males then forcefully insert their genitalia into the female vulvar opening. In the newt species Notophthalmus viridescens, males carry out a courtship behavior called amplexus. It consists of males capturing females that do not want to mate with them and using their hind limbs to grasp the females by their pectoral regions.
Males of some species are able to immobilize females and force copulation. In pigs and boars, males grab females and maneuver the pelvis to lift the vaginal opening and facilitate copulation. The stimulation following intromission causes the female to be immobilized. The male can then freely continue copulation without worrying about the female escaping. Immobilization of the female also occurs in muscovy ducks.
In some mammal species, it is common for males to commit infanticide to mate with females. This happens often in species that live in groups, such as Old and New World monkeys, apes, prosimians, and hamadryas baboons. There is usually a single breeding male in a group, and when an outside male aggressively takes over, he kills off all of the young offspring. The males kill infants that are not their own to assert their strength and position, and mate with the females. Killing infants may also bring breastfeeding females out of lactational amenorrhea and back into fecundity, improving the male’s chance of fertilising the female if he returns to mate with her again soon.
Sometimes, multiple males will invade a troop and gang up on females, killing their offspring and subsequently mating with them. This occurs in spider monkeys, red-backed squirrel monkeys, chimpanzees, and red howlers.
Another form of coercion is male mate guarding, used to keep females from mating with other males, and often involves aggression. Guarding allows the males to ensure their paternity. A classic example occurs in diving beetles, family Dytiscidae. After copulation, males continue to guard females for up to six hours. They hold them underwater, occasionally tilting them up for air. Guarding also occurs in water striders where, once males complete their sperm transfer, they often remain on top of the females. This guarding duration varies, lasting from several minutes to several weeks. The purpose of such long guarding periods is for the males to see the females lay their eggs and be assured that the offspring are theirs. This behavior also occurs in hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas), where the leader males practice intensive mate guarding. In Drosophila montana, studies have shown that following mate guarding, the chances of a female mating with or being inseminated by another male were greatly diminished. This shows that the mate guarding tactic can be very effective.
Males of some species use bodily fluids, such as seminal fluid from their ejaculate, to aid in the coercion of females. Seminal fluid in males of Drosophila melanogaster may contain chemicals that increase the amount of time it takes for females to remate, decrease the length of successive matings, or keep her from remating at all. The less a female mates with other males after copulation with a male, the more likely it is for him to ensure his paternity. These chemicals may also serve to increase the female's reproductive success, but at the cost of decreased longevity and immune response.
A major direct cost of sexual coercion is physical injury. Male seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) have sclerotized spines on their genitalia, which penetrate the female and leave melanized scars. Females can be physically injured from just one mating, and the more a female mates, the more scarring forms in the copulatory duct. In guppies, the male's gonopodium can cause damage when forcefully inserted, causing cloacal damage to the females. In fowl, females can be physically injured during forceful copulations. Also, semen transferred from the males can contain pathogens and fecal matter, which can lead to disease and decrease female fitness. In elephant seals, physical injury happens very often. In fact, mating leads to 1 in every 1,000 female elephant seals getting killed. Other species in which the females (and/or their offspring) are injured or even killed include lions, rodents, farm cats, crabeater seals, grey seals, sea lions, bottle-nosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis), and newts (N. viridescens).
Another cost is the excess energy and time expenditure that comes with mating. For example, female water striders, Gerridae, and marine snails of the genus Littorina have to carry the males on their backs while they mate. First of all, this is a great loss of energy. Second, both the male and the female are at a much greater risk of predation in this position. Furthermore, the time spent mating interferes with the time that could have been spent foraging and feeding.
In addition, sexual coercion can lower body condition and immunity in ways other than physical damage. Harassment can lead to stress, which can result in weight loss, decreased immune function and energy stores, and less feeding, which has been seen in red-spotted newts. Furthermore, when females are constantly moving around to avoid violent males, they are not able to form female social ties (for example, Grévy's zebra/Equus grevyi). This also happens in species where herding males sometimes do not permit females to join their family in different groups, like in hamadryad baboons.
Indirect costs are those that affect females in the future. One such cost happens because sexual coercion does not allow females to choose the males they want to mate with, which are usually males that are higher quality, compatible, and/or have good genes that will increase their offspring's survival and fitness. Coercion decreases this choice and can lead to their offspring having lower genetic quality. Studies of the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus), have shown that offspring of females with mate choice had higher survival rates than offspring of females that did not. Another ultimate cost comes from when males commit infanticide to obtain mating access. This loss of offspring leads to a decrease in fitness of females.
As a response to sexual coercion and the costs that females face, one of their counter-adaptations is the evolution of anatomical protection. Females of some species, such as the water striders, developed morphological shields to protect their genitalia from males that want to forcefully copulate. Some Gerridae females have also evolved abdominal spines and altered the shapes of their abdomens to make them less accessible to males.
Another female tactic to counter coercion is to try to avoid males that may cause them harm. To do this, females often change their habitats to get away from aggressive males, as is seen in wild Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Female bottlenose dolphins behave in similar ways by moving into shallow waters where there are not too many males. Other species that practice mate avoidance are Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis, a species of damselfly, who often try to hide from large groups of males to avoid harassment.
An effective female strategy is the employment of protection and alliances. Some females, such as wild Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulate) associate themselves with protective males who come to their rescue. This also occurs in hamadryas, savanna, and olive baboons, where males and females form friendships where the female gets male protection. In northern elephant seals, the females give loud cries when mounted by undesirable or subordinate males, which attract dominant males to help. A similar phenomenon occurs in elephants, bighorn sheep, and fallow deer, where the females stay close to dominant males for protection.
Females can also form alliances with other females for protection against aggressive males. Researchers have observed such alliances in many other female-bonded species, including other Old World monkeys such as macaques, olive baboons, patas and rhesus monkeys, and gray langurs; New World monkeys such as the capuchin; and prosimians such as the ring-tailed lemur. In African vervet monkeys, related females often form groups and “gang up” on males. Females of high rank create networks of female alliances; together, they fight away persistent suitors.
Resisting males and fighting back are important tactics some species use to counter male coercion. Many females try to vigorously shake off males to dislodge them and flee; this is seen in female sepsid flies and diving beetles. Sepsids also try to bend their abdomen in such a way that males cannot copulate forcefully. Females are especially likely to fight back when they are protecting their offspring. This is seen in mountain gorillas, red howlers, and grey langur females, where males are often infanticidal.
Female resistance has rarely been found to be effective. Male mammals and birds are usually larger than females, and the sheer size and strength difference makes this very difficult. However, it has been observed in some species, such as squirrel monkeys, patas monkeys, vervets, and captive chimpanzees, that females can “gang up” on males when they are being aggressive. They will even try to protect a female in distress. Females have even been observed to kill immigrant males in wild red colobus monkeys.
Sometimes, females choose not to struggle and simply acquiesce to forceful matings. This can happen when they decide that the cost of resisting would be greater than the cost of mating. They use submission to avoid further harassment or aggression, which could end in death or injury. This is often seen in primate species, such as chimpanzees and hamadryas baboons.
Some possible benefits of sexual coercion for the species have been hypothesized.
A possible proximate benefit for females is that sometimes after a male mates with a female, he becomes her mate. Then, he would defend and protect her. This is seen in many primate species.
A possible benefit of sexual coercion that would come out in the long run is the “good genes” hypothesis. If males can overcome a female's resistance, then they must possess good genes that would increase the survival or mating success of male offspring. The hypothesis is that females can use the sexual coercion process to assess the quality of a male.
Sexual coercion often leads to an intersexual coevolutionary arms race. This consists of females evolving adaptations to male advances and males evolving counter-adaptations as a response. Males persist in violent behavior, which favors the evolution of female resistance to defend themselves. In organisms where males have genitalia harmful to females, such as in certain insects, females tend to evolve thicker, less sensitive copulatory tracts. Also, they may evolve a shield over their genital openings to prevent intromission. Females of some species of water striders have evolved protection from forceful insemination, such as abdominal spines and downward-bent abdomens to make it harder for males to mate. In response, however, males have counter evolved, also changing the shape of their abdomens to those that would facilitate forceful mating.
The male waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) evolution of a phallus to forcefully copulate with females has led to counteradaptations in females in the form of vaginal structures called dead end sacs and clockwise coils. These structures make it harder for males to achieve intromission. The clockwise coils are significant because the male phallus everts out of their body in a counter-clockwise spiral; therefore, a clockwise vaginal structure would impede forceful copulation. Studies have shown that, the longer a male's phallus, the more elaborate the corresponding vaginal structures.
Speciation has been observed to be a possible consequence of sexual coercion. In diving beetle species family Dytiscidae, an intersexual arms race occurs between males and females. Males have evolved suction cup structures on their forelegs to help grasp females; females have counter-evolved setose dorsal furrows to impede forceful copulation. This continuous evolution (in both the forward and reverse directions) has led to the recent speciation of A. japonicus and A. kishii, where females of A. kishii have lost their dorsal furrows while those of A. japonicus have not.
Sexual coercion can lead to sexual dimorphisms, in which males and females have significant morphological differences. For example, in some species, larger males are more successful in forcefully mating/insemination, leading to a higher fitness. In red-sided garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis, it has been shown that heavier-bodied males were better courters and their size gave them an advantage over smaller bodied snakes. This helps lead to an evolution of sexual dimorphism, with males larger than females. In other species, males that are smaller than females have higher fitness. As such, many sex-specific morphological adaptations (for example, in Dytiscidae diving beetles, females have setose dorsal furrows that males do not and males have suction cups on their forelegs that females do not) are sexual dimorphisms caused by sexual coercion.
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Stamos, David N., Evolution and the Big Questions: Sex, Race, Religion, and Other Matters, John Wiley & Sons, 2011; Alcock, John, The Triumph of Sociobiology, Oxford University Press, 2003, p.207-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=jxBe-f3cTgwC
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Rönn, J., Katvala, M. & Arnqvist, G. "Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 10921–5 (2007). http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10921.full?linkType=FULL&resid=104/26/10921&journalCode=pnas
Muller, M. N., Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M. & Wrangham, R. W. "Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 274, 1009–14 (2007). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141672/
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Fury, C. A., Ruckstuhl, K. E. & Harrison, P. L. "Spatial and social sexual segregation patterns in indo-pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus)". PLoS ONE 8, e52987 (2013). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052987
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Valero, A., Macías Garcia, C. & Magurran, A. E. "Heterospecific harassment of native endangered fishes by invasive guppies in Mexico". Biology letters 4, 149–52 (2008). http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/2/149.full
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
McFarland, R. & Majolo, B. "Grooming coercion and the post-conflict trading of social services in wild Barbary macaques". PLoS ONE 6, e26893 (2011). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026893
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Nitsch, F., Stueckle, S., Stahl, D. & Zinner, D. "Copulation patterns in captive hamadryas baboons: a quantitative analysis". Primates; journal of primatology 52, 373–83 (2011). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10329-011-0258-2
Knott, C. D., Emery Thompson, M., Stumpf, R. M. & McIntyre, M. H. "Female reproductive strategies in orangutans, evidence for female choice and counterstrategies to infanticide in a species with frequent sexual coercion". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 105–13 (2010). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/277/1678/105.full
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Male water striders attract predators to intimidate females into copulation". Nature Communications 1, 52 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964456/
Hunt, J. H.; Richard, F.-J. (2013-08-17). "Intracolony vibroacoustic communication in social insects". Insectes Sociaux. 60 (4). International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) Springer: 403–417. doi:10.1007/s00040-013-0311-9. ISSN 0020-1812. S2CID 14658531. /wiki/Insectes_Sociaux
Shine, R., Langkilde, T. & Mason, R. T. "Courtship tactics in garter snakes: how do a male's morphology and behaviour influence his mating success"? Animal Behaviour 67, 477–483 (2004) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Shine/publication/222434765_Courtship_tactics_in_garter_snakes_How_do_a_male's_morphology_and_behaviour_influence_his_mating_success/links/0fcfd4fc46ad6dfdfc000000.pdf
Rönn, J., Katvala, M. & Arnqvist, G. "Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 10921–5 (2007). http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10921.full?linkType=FULL&resid=104/26/10921&journalCode=pnas
Puniamoorthy, N., Su, K. F.-Y. & Meier, R. "Bending for love: losses and gains of sexual dimorphisms are strictly correlated with changes in the mounting position of sepsid flies (Sepsidae: Diptera)". BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, 155 (2008). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-8-155
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. "Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes". PLoS ONE 2, e522 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
Brennan, P. L. R. et al. "Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl". PLoS ONE 2, e418 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000418
Mazzi, D., Kesäniemi, J., Hoikkala, A. & Klappert, K. "Sexual conflict over the duration of copulation in Drosophila montana: why is longer better?" BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 132 (2009). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-9-132
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Han, C. S., Jablonski, P. G., Kim, B. & Park, F. C. "Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior". BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 359 (2010). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-359
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Valero, A., Macías Garcia, C. & Magurran, A. E. "Heterospecific harassment of native endangered fishes by invasive guppies in Mexico". Biology letters 4, 149–52 (2008). http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/2/149.full
Zehr, J. L. NIH Public Access. 41, 101–112 (2005).
Rivera, a C. & Andrés, J. a "Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly". Journal of insect science (Online) 2, 14 (2002). https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/2/1/14/863639
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Zehr, J. L. NIH Public Access. 41, 101–112 (2005).
Pizzari, T. "Indirect partner choice through manipulation of male behaviour by female fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 268, 181–6 (2001). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088589/pdf/PB010181.pdf
Cunningham, E. J. A. & Cheng, K. M. "Biases in sperm use in the mallard : no evidence for selection by females based on sperm genotype". (1999). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1689918/pdf/G24821KQBQ45GGT8_266_905.pdf
Grueter, C. C., Chapais, B. & Zinner, D. "Evolution of Multilevel Social Systems in Nonhuman Primates and Humans". International journal of primatology 33, 1002–1037 (2012). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-012-9618-z
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Grueter, C. C., Chapais, B. & Zinner, D. "Evolution of Multilevel Social Systems in Nonhuman Primates and Humans". International journal of primatology 33, 1002–1037 (2012). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-012-9618-z
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Muller, M. N., Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M. & Wrangham, R. W. "Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 274, 1009–14 (2007). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141672/
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. "Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes". PLoS ONE 2, e522 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
Han, C. S., Jablonski, P. G., Kim, B. & Park, F. C. "Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior". BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 359 (2010). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-359
Grueter, C. C., Chapais, B. & Zinner, D. "Evolution of Multilevel Social Systems in Nonhuman Primates and Humans". International journal of primatology 33, 1002–1037 (2012). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-012-9618-z
Mazzi, D., Kesäniemi, J., Hoikkala, A. & Klappert, K. "Sexual conflict over the duration of copulation in Drosophila montana: why is longer better?" BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 132 (2009). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-9-132
Mazzi, D., Kesäniemi, J., Hoikkala, A. & Klappert, K. "Sexual conflict over the duration of copulation in Drosophila montana: why is longer better?" BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 132 (2009). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-9-132
Mazzi, D., Kesäniemi, J., Hoikkala, A. & Klappert, K. "Sexual conflict over the duration of copulation in Drosophila montana: why is longer better?" BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 132 (2009). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-9-132
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Rönn, J., Katvala, M. & Arnqvist, G. "Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 10921–5 (2007). http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10921.full?linkType=FULL&resid=104/26/10921&journalCode=pnas
Valero, A., Macías Garcia, C. & Magurran, A. E. "Heterospecific harassment of native endangered fishes by invasive guppies in Mexico". Biology letters 4, 149–52 (2008). http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/2/149.full
Pizzari, T. "Indirect partner choice through manipulation of male behaviour by female fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 268, 181–6 (2001). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088589/pdf/PB010181.pdf
Zehr, J. L. NIH Public Access. 41, 101–112 (2005).
Rohner, Simon (2020). "Male grey seal commits fatal sexual interaction with adult female harbour seals in the German Wadden Sea". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 13679. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7426965/
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Fury, C. A., Ruckstuhl, K. E. & Harrison, P. L. "Spatial and social sexual segregation patterns in indo-pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus)". PLoS ONE 8, e52987 (2013). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052987
Shine, R., Langkilde, T. & Mason, R. T. "Courtship tactics in garter snakes: how do a male's morphology and behaviour influence his mating success"? Animal Behaviour 67, 477–483 (2004) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Shine/publication/222434765_Courtship_tactics_in_garter_snakes_How_do_a_male's_morphology_and_behaviour_influence_his_mating_success/links/0fcfd4fc46ad6dfdfc000000.pdf
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Han, C. S., Jablonski, P. G., Kim, B. & Park, F. C. "Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior". BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 359 (2010). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-359
Han, C. S., Jablonski, P. G., Kim, B. & Park, F. C. "Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior". BMC Evolutionary Biology 10, 359 (2010). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-359
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Darden, S. K., James, R., Ramnarine, I. W. & Croft, D. P. "Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 276, 2651–6 (2009). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/04/20/rspb.2009.0087.full
Grayson, K. L., De Lisle, S. P., Jackson, J. E., Black, S. J. & Crespi, E. J. "Behavioral and physiological female responses to male sex ratio bias in a pond-breeding amphibian". Frontiers in Zoology 9, 24 (2012). https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-9994-9-24
Darden, S. K., James, R., Ramnarine, I. W. & Croft, D. P. "Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 276, 2651–6 (2009). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/04/20/rspb.2009.0087.full
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Garner, S. R., Bortoluzzi, R. N., Heath, D. D. & Neff, B. D. "Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 885–94 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842720/
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Male water striders attract predators to intimidate females into copulation". Nature Communications 1, 52 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964456/
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Brennan, P. L. R. et al. "Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl". PLoS ONE 2, e418 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000418
Brennan, P. L. R., Clark, C. J. & Prum, R. O. "Explosive eversion and functional morphology of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl genitalia". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 1309–14 (2010). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/12/18/rspb.2009.2139.full.html
Fury, C. A., Ruckstuhl, K. E. & Harrison, P. L. "Spatial and social sexual segregation patterns in indo-pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus)". PLoS ONE 8, e52987 (2013). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052987
Fury, C. A., Ruckstuhl, K. E. & Harrison, P. L. "Spatial and social sexual segregation patterns in indo-pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus)". PLoS ONE 8, e52987 (2013). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052987
Rivera, a C. & Andrés, J. a "Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly". Journal of insect science (Online) 2, 14 (2002). https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/2/1/14/863639
Johannesson, K., Saltin, S. H., Duranovic, I., Havenhand, J. N. & Jonsson, P. R. "Indiscriminate males: mating behaviour of a marine snail compromised by a sexual conflict?" PLoS ONE 5, e12005 (2010). /wiki/Kerstin_Johannesson
Johannesson, K., Saltin, S. H., Duranovic, I., Havenhand, J. N. & Jonsson, P. R. "Indiscriminate males: mating behaviour of a marine snail compromised by a sexual conflict?" PLoS ONE 5, e12005 (2010). /wiki/Kerstin_Johannesson
Darden, S. K. & Croft, D. P. "Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes". Biology letters 4, 449–51 (2008). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610095/
Grueter, C. C., Chapais, B. & Zinner, D. "Evolution of Multilevel Social Systems in Nonhuman Primates and Humans". International journal of primatology 33, 1002–1037 (2012). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-012-9618-z
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
"Apes of Wrath". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 2021-02-04. https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/apes-of-wrath
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Puniamoorthy, N., Su, K. F.-Y. & Meier, R. "Bending for love: losses and gains of sexual dimorphisms are strictly correlated with changes in the mounting position of sepsid flies (Sepsidae: Diptera)". BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, 155 (2008). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-8-155
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. "Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes". PLoS ONE 2, e522 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
Puniamoorthy, N., Su, K. F.-Y. & Meier, R. "Bending for love: losses and gains of sexual dimorphisms are strictly correlated with changes in the mounting position of sepsid flies (Sepsidae: Diptera)". BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, 155 (2008). https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-8-155
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Rivera, a C. & Andrés, J. a "Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly". Journal of insect science (Online) 2, 14 (2002). https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/2/1/14/863639
Darden, S. K., James, R., Ramnarine, I. W. & Croft, D. P. "Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 276, 2651–6 (2009). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/04/20/rspb.2009.0087.full
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Rivera, a C. & Andrés, J. a "Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly". Journal of insect science (Online) 2, 14 (2002). https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/2/1/14/863639
Smuts, Barbara B. "Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications". Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Smuts/publication/229195611_Male_Aggression_and_Sexual_Coercion_of_Females_in_Nonhuman_Primates_and_Other_Mammals_Evidence_and_Theoretical_Implications/links/0deec537b743790a2a000000.pdf
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. "Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes". PLoS ONE 2, e522 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Rönn, J., Katvala, M. & Arnqvist, G. "Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 10921–5 (2007). http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10921.full?linkType=FULL&resid=104/26/10921&journalCode=pnas
Rönn, J., Katvala, M. & Arnqvist, G. "Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 10921–5 (2007). http://www.pnas.org/content/104/26/10921.full?linkType=FULL&resid=104/26/10921&journalCode=pnas
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Male water striders attract predators to intimidate females into copulation". Nature Communications 1, 52 (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964456/
Han, C. S. & Jablonski, P. G. "Female genitalia concealment promotes intimate male courtship in a water strider". PLoS ONE 4, e5793 (2009). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005793
Brennan, P. L. R. et al. "Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl". PLoS ONE 2, e418 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000418
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. "Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes". PLoS ONE 2, e522 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Shine, R., Langkilde, T. & Mason, R. T. "Courtship tactics in garter snakes: how do a male's morphology and behaviour influence his mating success"? Animal Behaviour 67, 477–483 (2004) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Shine/publication/222434765_Courtship_tactics_in_garter_snakes_How_do_a_male's_morphology_and_behaviour_influence_his_mating_success/links/0fcfd4fc46ad6dfdfc000000.pdf
Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. a, Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. "Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders". Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269, 2309–16 (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691163/pdf/12495497.pdf
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. "Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes". PLoS ONE 2, e522 (2007). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522