"Covert desensitization" associates an aversive stimulus with a behavior that the client wishes to reduce or eliminate. This is achieved by imagining the target behavior followed by imagining an aversive consequence. "Covert extinction" attempts to reduce a behavior by imagining the target behavior while imagining that the reinforcer does not occur. "Covert response cost" seeks to reduce a behavior by associating the loss of a reinforcer with the target behavior that is to be decreased.
"Contact desensitization" intends to increase a behavior by imagining a reinforcing experience in connection with modeling the correct behavior. "Covert negative reinforcement" attempts to increase a behavior by connecting the termination of an aversive stimulus with increased production of a target behavior.
"Dialectical behavior therapy" (DBT) and "Acceptance and commitment therapy" (ACT) uses positive reinforcement and covert conditioning through mindfulness.
Previous research in the early 1990s has shown covert conditioning to be effective with sex offenders as part of a behavior modification treatment package.3 Clinical studies continue to find it effective with some generalization from office to natural environment with this population.4
Cautela, Joseph R.; Kearney, Albert J. (1986). The Covert Conditioning Handbook. New York: Springer. ↩
Marshall, W. L.; Jones, R.; Ward, T.; Johnston, P.; Barbaree, H. E. (1991). "Treatment outcomes with sex offenders". Clinical Psychology Review. 11 (4): 465–485. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(91)90119-F. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Rea, J. (2003). "Covert Sensitization" (PDF). The Behavior Analyst Today. 4 (2): 192–204. doi:10.1037/h0100119. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-12-29. https://web.archive.org/web/20101229160303/http://www.baojournal.com/BAT%20Journal/VOL-4/BAT-4.-2.pdf ↩