Monolingualism

<h2 id="comparison-with-multilingualism">Comparison with multilingualism</h2>
<h3>Vocabulary size and verbal fluency</h3>
<p>According to a study on lexical access,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8"><sup>8</sup></a> monolinguals often maintain a wider <a href="/facts/Vocabulary/gUfoY6TJ">vocabulary</a> in a target language relative to a comparable <a href="/facts/Bilingual/WgzhSW6h">bilingual</a>, and that increases the efficiency of word retrieval in monolinguals. Monolinguals also access words more often than bilinguals in a target language.
</p><p>In letter fluency tasks, monolinguals in the study were also able to respond with more words to the letter cue than bilinguals, but such an effect was not seen in bilinguals with a high <a href="/facts/Vocabulary/gUfoY6TJ">vocabulary</a> score.
</p><p>Also, monolinguals performed better than bilinguals on verbal fluency in the study. If the vocabulary abilities were made to be more comparable, however, many of the differences would disappear, indicating that <a href="/facts/Vocabulary/gUfoY6TJ">vocabulary</a> size may be a factor that moderated a person's performance in verbal fluency and naming tasks. The same study also found that bilinguals, in a version of the letter fluency task that placed more demand on executive control, performed better than monolinguals. Thus, once <a href="/facts/Vocabulary/gUfoY6TJ">vocabulary</a> abilities were controlled, bilinguals performed better on letter fluency possibilities by the enhanced frontal executive processes in the <a href="/facts/Brain/EKla9NkJ">brain</a>.
</p><p>It is important to note here that bilinguals' overall vocabulary size in both languages combined was equivalent to monolinguals' in one language, even though monolinguals may excel in vocabulary size for the one language they speak. Bilinguals may have smaller vocabularies in each individual language, but when their vocabularies were combined, the content size was approximately similar to that of the monolingual. Monolingual children demonstrated larger vocabulary scored than their bilingual peers, but bilingual children's vocabulary scores still increased with age, just like the monolingual children's vocabulary scores (Core et al., 2011). Despite a variation in vocabulary scores, there was absolutely no difference between monolingual and bilingual children in terms of total vocabulary size and total vocabulary gains (Core et al., 2011). Bilingual children and monolingual children have the same vocabulary size and gain the same vocabulary knowledge.
</p>
<h3>Creative functioning</h3>
<p>In a study testing for creative functioning that involved monolingual and bilingual children in <a href="/facts/Singapore/CQDkhUvD">Singapore</a>,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:9" href="#fn:9"><sup>9</sup></a> researchers found that monolinguals performed better on fluency and flexibility than bilinguals. The trend was reversed, however, on tests for originality and elaboration.
</p>
<h3>Mental well-being</h3>
<p>In another recent study in <a href="/facts/Canada/cWWFM8oc">Canada</a>, it has been shown that monolinguals were worse at the onset of <a href="/facts/Senility/T0MRDE9I">senility</a> than bilinguals.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:10" href="#fn:10"><sup>10</sup></a> In the study, it seems that being <a href="/facts/Bilingual/WgzhSW6h">bilingual</a> is associated with a delay of <a href="/facts/Dementia/T0MRDE9I">dementia</a> by four years as compared to monolinguals. Bialystok's most recent work also shows that lifelong bilingualism can delay symptoms of <a href="/facts/Dementia/T0MRDE9I">dementia</a>.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:11" href="#fn:11"><sup>11</sup></a>
</p><p>It is believed that bilingualism contributes to <a href="/facts/Cognitive_reserve/wrHusc5j">cognitive reserve</a> by preventing effects of cognitive delay and prolonging the onset of sicknesses such as dementia. Cognitive reserve refers to the idea that engaging in stimulating physical or mental activity maintains cognitive functioning (Bialystok et al., 2012). In that case, knowing more than one language is similar to stimulating mental activity. To test whether or not bilingualism contributes to cognitive reserve, Bialystok et al. (2012) looked at hospital records among monolingual and bilingual adults who have dementia. The researchers found that elderly bilingual adults were diagnosed with dementia about three to four years later than elderly monolingual adults. The results have been replicated and validated, with outside factors being controlled. In fact, outside factors such as socioeconomic status and cultural differences always helped monolinguals, making the argument the bilingualism contributes to cognitive reserve even stronger (Bialystok et al., 2012). That finding enhances the fact that bilinguals are at an advantage because of their ability to speak two languages, not because of outside factors. A probable explanation for this phenomenon is that knowledge of multiple languages keeps the brain alert and therefore more mentally aware for a longer period of time.
</p>
<h3>Emotion and behavior</h3>
<p>A study conducted with children in their early school years suggested that there are emotional and behavioural benefits to being bilingual.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:12" href="#fn:12"><sup>12</sup></a> In the same study, the findings show that monolingual children, in particular non-English monolingual children, display more poor behavioural and emotional outcomes in their school years. The non-English monolingual children had the highest level of externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems by fifth grade (around 10–11 years of age), even though the children were all measured to have similar levels of internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems at the start. In contrast, the fluent <a href="/facts/Bilingual/WgzhSW6h">bilingual</a> and non-English dominant bilingual children were found to have the lowest level of these behavioural problems. The authors suggest that monolingualism seems to be a risk factor. However, if there is a supportive school environment with teachers who are experienced in <a href="/facts/ESL/mQ4TeFYL">ESL</a> (English as a Second Language), children seem to have better emotional constitution.
</p>
<h3>Memory performance</h3>
<p>In a study conducted at the <a href="/facts/University_of_Florida/zGg0HXXs">University of Florida</a>, which compared Native-English <a href="/facts/Bilingual/WgzhSW6h">bilinguals</a> to English monolinguals, although there was no difference in accuracy between the two groups, there was a slower response rate from bilinguals on tasks that involve latency of recognition of a list of abstract words and <a href="/facts/Lexical_decision_task/pQG85TPu">lexical decision tasks</a>, but not in any of the other tasks used in their study.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:13" href="#fn:13"><sup>13</sup></a> The researchers noted that the tasks where bilinguals had a significant disadvantage were those which were data-driven (subjects were given verbal input and asked to make decisions about it), as opposed to conceptually driven (subjects were asked to produce verbal output). The study differed from prior research in that the bilingual subjects were more balanced in their familiarity with their two languages. Mägiste hypothesized that the bilingual disadvantage could have been due to differential familiarity with the dominant language.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:14" href="#fn:14"><sup>14</sup></a> They explained that for bilinguals, it could be because the acquiring and using of the <a href="/facts/Second_language/aUqAzeNK">second language</a> meant that there was less time to process the <a href="/facts/First_language/1yK3tnLb">first language</a>, as compared to the monolingual participants in the study.
</p><p>However, evidence from a research study shows that bilinguals have a faster reaction time in most working memory tasks. While a lot of research asserts that monolingual children outperform bilingual children, other research asserts the opposite. Research by Bialystok et al., as reported by Kapa and Colombo (2013, p. 233) shows that bilingual individuals perform better than monolingual individuals on a wide variety of cognitive tests, thus demonstrating cognitive control advantages. Two different concepts, attentional inhibition and attentional monitoring, are used to measure attentional control. In terms of attentional control, early bilingual learners showed the greatest advantage, compared to monolingual speakers and late bilingual speakers. In terms of overall performance on ATN, the three groups performed equally, but when age and verbal ability variables were controlled, there was a difference in reaction time. The early bilingual children's reaction time was tremendously faster than the monolingual children, and only slightly faster than the late bilingual children (Kapa & Colombo, 2013). Early bilingual learners showed that they simply responded most efficiently to the task at hand. The results from this study demonstrate the advantages bilingual children have with attentional control. This is likely because bilingual children are used to balancing more than one language at time, and are therefore used to focusing on which language is necessary at a certain time. By constantly being aware of what language to use and being able to successfully switch between languages, it makes sense that bilingual children would be better at directing and focusing their attention.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:15" href="#fn:15"><sup>15</sup></a>
</p>
<h3>Verbal and non-verbal cognitive development</h3>
<p>A 2012 study by the <a href="/facts/University_of_York/qXEdu8vD">University of York</a> published in <i>Child Development</i> journal<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:16" href="#fn:16"><sup>16</sup></a> reviewed the effects of the development of a child's verbal and non-verbal language, matched between monolinguals and bilinguals in a particular language. Researchers compared about 100 6-year-old monolingual and <a href="/facts/Bilingual/WgzhSW6h">bilingual</a> children (monolingual in English; bilingual in English and Mandarin, bilingual in French and English, bilingual in Spanish and English), to test their verbal and <a href="/facts/Non-verbal_communication/Fq7EdXMW">non-verbal communication</a> <a href="/facts/Cognitive_development/EfY2fWLR">cognitive development</a>. The research takes into consideration factors like the similarity of the language, the cultural background and education experience. These students mostly come from public schools from various areas, having similar social and economic background.
</p><p>Results show that in the child's early stage, multilingual kids are very different from one another in their language and <a href="/facts/Cognitive/ga0tSBul">cognitive</a> skills development, and also when compared to monolingual children. When compared to monolinguals, multilingual children are slower in building up their <a href="/facts/Vocabulary/gUfoY6TJ">vocabulary</a> in every language. However, their metalinguistic development allowed them to understand better the structure of the language. They also performed better in non-verbal control tests. A non-verbal control test refers to the ability to focus and then able to divert their attention when being instructed to.
</p>
<h2 id="reasons-for-persistence">Reasons for persistence</h2>
<h3>Convergence principle</h3>
<p>According to the convergence principle,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:17" href="#fn:17"><sup>17</sup></a> language style tends to change to that of people who are liked and admired. Conversations in which one party speaks a language different from the other persons both are hard to maintain and have reduced intimacy. Thus, speech is usually adapted and accommodated for convenience, lack of misunderstanding and conflict and the maintenance of intimacy. In intermarriages, one partner tends to become monolingual, which also usually applies to the children.
</p>
<h3>Predominance of English</h3>
<p class="note">See also: <a href="/facts/English-only_movement/ST5D9k2h">English-only movement</a></p>
<p>The predominance of <a href="/facts/English_language/tpkxGt7b">English</a> in many sectors, such as world trade, <a href="/facts/Technology/9Uav5WVR">technology</a> and <a href="/facts/Science/IJoaD7rs">science</a>, has contributed to English-speaking societies being persistently monolingual, as there is little incentive to learn a <a href="/facts/Second_language/aUqAzeNK">second language</a> if all dealings can be done in their <a href="/facts/Native_language/1yK3tnLb">native language</a>;<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:18" href="#fn:18"><sup>18</sup></a> that is especially the case for English-speakers in the <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">United States</a>, particularly the <a href="/facts/Southwestern_United_States/LjLFs9fC">Southwestern United States</a> and most of the <a href="/facts/Southern_United_States/ppnGuAtB">Southern United States</a>, where everyday contact with other languages, such as <a href="/facts/Spanish_language/95BgYNfv">Spanish</a> and <a href="/facts/French_language/qe1DnaQh">French</a> is usually limited. The country's large area and the most populous regions' distance from large non-English-speaking areas, such as <a href="/facts/Mexico/IT5bwhdh">Mexico</a> and <a href="/facts/Quebec/4hhNvb4t">Quebec</a>, increase the geographic and economic barriers to foreign travel.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:19" href="#fn:19"><sup>19</sup></a> Nevertheless, the requirement for all school children to learn a foreign language in some English speaking countries and areas works against this to some extent. Although the country is economically interdependent with trade partners such as M.Caddell, American corporations and heavily-Americanized subsidiaries of foreign corporations both mediate and control most citizens' contact with most other nations' products. There is a popular joke: "What do you call a person who speaks three languages? A trilingual.  What do you call a person who speaks two languages? A bilingual. What do you call a person who speaks one language? An American."<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:20" href="#fn:20"><sup>20</sup></a>
</p>
<h2 id="costs">Costs</h2>
<p>Snow and Hakuta<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:21" href="#fn:21"><sup>21</sup></a> write that in a cost-benefit analysis, the choosing of English as the official and national language often comes with additional costs on the society, as the alternative choice of multilingualism has its own benefits.
</p>
<h3>Education</h3>
<p>Some of the education budget is allocated for foreign-language training, but <a href="/facts/Fluency/hA2wg8XC">fluency</a> of foreign-language students is lower than those who learned it at home.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:22" href="#fn:22"><sup>22</sup></a>
</p>
<h3>Economic</h3>
<p><a href="/facts/International_business/GX7U7rep">International business</a> may be impeded by a lack of people competent in other languages.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:23" href="#fn:23"><sup>23</sup></a>
</p>
<h3>National security</h3>
<p>Money has to be spent to train foreign-service personnel in foreign languages.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:24" href="#fn:24"><sup>24</sup></a>
</p>
<h3>Time and effort</h3>
<p>Compared to the maintenance of a language that is learned at home, more time, effort and hard work are required to learn it in school.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:25" href="#fn:25"><sup>25</sup></a>
</p>
<h3>Job opportunities</h3>
<p>Kirkpatrick asserts that monolinguals are at a disadvantage to bilinguals in the international job market.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:26" href="#fn:26"><sup>26</sup></a>
</p>
<h2 id="in-the-media">In the media</h2>
<p><a href="/facts/Lawrence_Summers/QyDj7Eqt">Lawrence Summers</a>, in an article published in <i><a href="/facts/The_New_York_Times/T9marWVX">The New York Times</a></i>,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:27" href="#fn:27"><sup>27</sup></a> discusses how to prepare for the future advancement of America. He also questioned the importance and necessity of learning foreign languages by remarking that "English's emergence as the <a href="/facts/Global_language/76EkMMr3">global language</a>, along with the rapid progress in <a href="/facts/Machine_translation/DGF3NwuI">machine translation</a> and the fragmentation of languages spoken around the world, makes it less clear that the substantial investment necessary to speak a foreign tongue is universally worthwhile."
</p><p>Others have disagreed with Summers' view. A week later, <i>The New York Times</i> hosted a discussion among six panelists,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:28" href="#fn:28"><sup>28</sup></a> all of whom were for learning foreign languages and cited the benefits and advantages and the changing global landscape.
</p>
<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/Multilingualism/WgzhSW6h">Multilingualism</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Languages_of_the_United_Kingdom/QQVBzqje">Languages of the United Kingdom</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Languages_of_the_United_States/70wYjJIa">Languages of the United States</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/Linguistic_imperialism/mJQjnGvU">Linguistic imperialism</a></li>
<li><a href="/facts/List_of_multilingual_countries_and_regions/FKVKmyGS">List of multilingual countries and regions</a></li></ul>

<ul><li>Bialystok, E.; Craik, F.; Luk, G. (2012). <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322418">"Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain"</a>. <i>Neuropsychology & Neurology, Linguistics & Language & Speech</i>. 16 (4): 240–250. <a href="/facts/PMC_(identifier)/dX1zMt71">PMC</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322418">3322418</a>.</li>
<li>Core, C.; Hoff, E.; Rumiche, R.; Senor, M. (2011). "Total and conceptual vocabulary in Spanish–English bilinguals from 22 to 30 months: Implications for assessment". <i>Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research</i>. 56 (5): 1637–1649.</li>
<li>Kapa, L.; Colombo, J. (2013). <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044912">"Attentional control in early and later bilingual children"</a>. <i>Cognitive Development</i>. 28 (3): 233–246. <a href="/facts/Doi_(identifier)/muM9Etpq">doi</a>:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.cogdev.2013.01.011">10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.01.011</a>. <a href="/facts/PMC_(identifier)/dX1zMt71">PMC</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044912">4044912</a>. <a href="/facts/PMID_(identifier)/JlHAvMHt">PMID</a> <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24910499">24910499</a>.</li></ul>
<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>

Look up <i>monoglottism</i>, <i>monolingualism</i>, or <i>unilingualism</i> in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

<ul><li><a href="https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=14+Cardozo+L.+Rev.+1713&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=30ce6efd643c7fdf6f394561a88d0a65">Monolingualism and Judaism</a> by Jose Faur, contrasting the Greek monolingualism with the polyglot culture of the Hebrews</li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1"><p>G. Richard Tucker (1999)A Global Perspective on Bilingualism and Bilingual Education Archived 2012-08-22 at the Wayback Machine Carnegie Mellon University CALL Digest EDO-FL-99-04 <a href="http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/digestglobal.html" target="_blank">http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/digestglobal.html</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:2"><p>Romaine, Suzzane (1995). Bilingualism. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-631-19539-9. <a href="978-0-631-19539-9" target="_blank">978-0-631-19539-9</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:3"><p>Pavlenko, Aneta (2000). "L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism". Issues in Applied Linguistics. 11 (2): 175–206. <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:4"><p>Ellis, Elizabeth (2006). "Monolingualism: The unmarked case". Estudios de Sociolingüística. 7 (2): 173–196. doi:10.1558/sols.v7i2.173. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:5"><p>Crystal, David (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-55967-6. <a href="978-0-521-55967-6" target="_blank">978-0-521-55967-6</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:6"><p>Edwards, Viv (2004). Multilingualism in the English-speaking world. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 3–5. ISBN 978-0-631-23613-9. <a href="978-0-631-23613-9" target="_blank">978-0-631-23613-9</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:7"><p>Ellis, Elizabeth (2006). "Monolingualism: The unmarked case". Estudios de Sociolingüística. 7 (2): 173–196. doi:10.1558/sols.v7i2.173. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:8"><p>Bialystok, Ellen; Craik, Fergus I.M; Luk, Gigi. (2008). "Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control". Journal of Neurolinguistics. 21 (6): 522–538. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.07.001. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:9"><p>Torrance, E. Paul; Gowan, John.C.; Wu, Jing-Jyi; Aliotti, Nicholas C. (1970). "Creative functioning of monolingual and bilingual children in Singapore". Journal of Educational Psychology. 61 (1): 72–75. doi:10.1037/h0028767. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:9" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:10"><p>"Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia". Neuropsychologia. January 11, 2007. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028393206004076" target="_blank">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028393206004076</a> <a href="#fnref:10" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:11"><p>"The rise of the monoglots". University Affairs.ca. August 5, 2008. Archived from the original on June 13, 2013. Retrieved March 11, 2012. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130613034632/http://www.universityaffairs.ca/the-rise-of-the-monoglots.aspx" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20130613034632/http://www.universityaffairs.ca/the-rise-of-the-monoglots.aspx</a> <a href="#fnref:11" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:12"><p>Han, Wen-Jui; Huang, Chien-Chung (2010). "The forgotten treasure: Bilingualism and Asian children's emotional and behavioural health". American Journal of Public Health. 100 (5): 831–838. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.174219. PMC 2853634. PMID 20299654. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853634" target="_blank">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853634</a> <a href="#fnref:12" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:13"><p>Ransdell, Sarah Ellen; Fischler, Ira (1987). "Memory in a monolingual mode:When are bilinguals at a disadvantage?". Journal of Memory and Language. 26 (4): 392–405. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(87)90098-2. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:13" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:14"><p>Mägiste, Edith (1980). "Memory for numbers in monolinguals and bilinguals". Acta Psychologica. 46: 63–68. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(80)90059-1. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:14" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:15"><p>Kapa, Leah L.; Colombo, John (July 2013). "Attentional control in early and later bilingual children". Cognitive Development. 28 (3): 233–246. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.01.011. ISSN 0885-2014. PMC 4044912. PMID 24910499. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044912" target="_blank">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044912</a> <a href="#fnref:15" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:16"><p>"最新研究：双语儿童比单语小孩更聪慧". 加拿大都市网. February 10, 2012. Archived from the original on June 6, 2015. Retrieved March 23, 2012. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150606164722/http://www.dushi.ca/tor/education/bencandy.php/fid18/aid1819" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20150606164722/http://www.dushi.ca/tor/education/bencandy.php/fid18/aid1819</a> <a href="#fnref:16" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:17"><p>Snow, Catherine E.; Hakuta, Kenji (1992). "The Costs of Monolingualism" (PDF). In Crawford, J. (ed.). Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. The University of Chicago. pp. 384–394. Retrieved March 9, 2012. <a href="https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:17" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:18"><p>Peel, Quentin (2001). "The monotony of monoglots". The Language Learning Journal. 23 (1): 13–14. doi:10.1080/09571730185200041. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" target="_blank">/wiki/Doi_(identifier)</a> <a href="#fnref:18" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:19"><p>"About One in Four Americans Can Hold a Conversation in a Second Language". <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/1825/about-one-four-americans-can-hold-conversation-second-language.aspx" target="_blank">https://news.gallup.com/poll/1825/about-one-four-americans-can-hold-conversation-second-language.aspx</a> <a href="#fnref:19" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:20"><p>Gramling, David (October 6, 2016). The Invention of Monolingualism. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 60–61. ISBN 978-1501318054. <a href="978-1501318054" target="_blank">978-1501318054</a> <a href="#fnref:20" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:21"><p>Snow, Catherine E.; Hakuta, Kenji (1992). "The Costs of Monolingualism" (PDF). In Crawford, J. (ed.). Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. The University of Chicago. pp. 384–394. Retrieved March 9, 2012. <a href="https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:21" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:22"><p>Snow, Catherine E.; Hakuta, Kenji (1992). "The Costs of Monolingualism" (PDF). In Crawford, J. (ed.). Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. The University of Chicago. pp. 384–394. Retrieved March 9, 2012. <a href="https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:22" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:23"><p>Snow, Catherine E.; Hakuta, Kenji (1992). "The Costs of Monolingualism" (PDF). In Crawford, J. (ed.). Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. The University of Chicago. pp. 384–394. Retrieved March 9, 2012. <a href="https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:23" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:24"><p>Snow, Catherine E.; Hakuta, Kenji (1992). "The Costs of Monolingualism" (PDF). In Crawford, J. (ed.). Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. The University of Chicago. pp. 384–394. Retrieved March 9, 2012. <a href="https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:24" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:25"><p>Snow, Catherine E.; Hakuta, Kenji (1992). "The Costs of Monolingualism" (PDF). In Crawford, J. (ed.). Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. The University of Chicago. pp. 384–394. Retrieved March 9, 2012. <a href="https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Publications/(1992)%20-THECOSTOFMONOLINGUALISM.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:25" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:26"><p>Kirkpatrick, Andy (2000). "The disadvantaged monolingual: Why English alone is not enough". Australian Language Matters. 8 (3): 5–7. <a href="#fnref:26" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:27"><p>Summers, Lawrence H. (January 20, 2012). "What You (Really) Need to Know". The New York Times. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/education/edlife/the-21st-century-education.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/education/edlife/the-21st-century-education.html?pagewanted=all</a> <a href="#fnref:27" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:28"><p>Berdan, Stacie Nevadomski; Jackson, Anthony; Erard, Michael; Ho, Melanie; Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo M.; Lewis, Clayton (January 29, 2012). "English Is Global, So Why Learn Arabic?". The New York Times. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/01/29/is-learning-a-language-other-than-english-worthwhile" target="_blank">https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/01/29/is-learning-a-language-other-than-english-worthwhile</a> <a href="#fnref:28" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
</ol>

Monolingualism open-in-new

Monolingualism