There are a number of notational systems for the Jacobi theta functions. The notations given in the Wikipedia article define the original function
which is equivalent to
where q = e π i τ {\displaystyle q=e^{\pi i\tau }} and w = e π i z {\displaystyle w=e^{\pi iz}} .
However, a similar notation is defined somewhat differently in Whittaker and Watson, p. 487:
This notation is attributed to "Hermite, H.J.S. Smith and some other mathematicians". They also define
This is a factor of i off from the definition of ϑ 11 {\displaystyle \vartheta _{11}} as defined in the Wikipedia article. These definitions can be made at least proportional by x = za, but other definitions cannot. Whittaker and Watson, Abramowitz and Stegun, and Gradshteyn and Ryzhik all follow Tannery and Molk, in which
Note that there is no factor of π in the argument as in the previous definitions.
Whittaker and Watson refer to still other definitions of ϑ j {\displaystyle \vartheta _{j}} . The warning in Abramowitz and Stegun, "There is a bewildering variety of notations...in consulting books caution should be exercised," may be viewed as an understatement. In any expression, an occurrence of ϑ ( z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (z)} should not be assumed to have any particular definition. It is incumbent upon the author to state what definition of ϑ ( z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (z)} is intended.