If the limit of the summand is undefined or nonzero, that is lim n → ∞ a n ≠ 0 {\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }a_{n}\neq 0} , then the series must diverge. In this sense, the partial sums are Cauchy only if this limit exists and is equal to zero. The test is inconclusive if the limit of the summand is zero. This is also known as the nth-term test, test for divergence, or the divergence test.
This is also known as d'Alembert's criterion.
This is also known as the nth root test or Cauchy's criterion.
The root test is stronger than the ratio test: whenever the ratio test determines the convergence or divergence of an infinite series, the root test does too, but not conversely.1
The series can be compared to an integral to establish convergence or divergence. Let f : [ 1 , ∞ ) → R + {\displaystyle f:[1,\infty )\to \mathbb {R} _{+}} be a non-negative and monotonically decreasing function such that f ( n ) = a n {\displaystyle f(n)=a_{n}} . If ∫ 1 ∞ f ( x ) d x = lim t → ∞ ∫ 1 t f ( x ) d x < ∞ , {\displaystyle \int _{1}^{\infty }f(x)\,dx=\lim _{t\to \infty }\int _{1}^{t}f(x)\,dx<\infty ,} then the series converges. But if the integral diverges, then the series does so as well. In other words, the series a n {\displaystyle {a_{n}}} converges if and only if the integral converges.
A commonly-used corollary of the integral test is the p-series test. Let k > 0 {\displaystyle k>0} . Then ∑ n = k ∞ ( 1 n p ) {\displaystyle \sum _{n=k}^{\infty }{\bigg (}{\frac {1}{n^{p}}}{\bigg )}} converges if p > 1 {\displaystyle p>1} .
The case of p = 1 , k = 1 {\displaystyle p=1,k=1} yields the harmonic series, which diverges. The case of p = 2 , k = 1 {\displaystyle p=2,k=1} is the Basel problem and the series converges to π 2 6 {\displaystyle {\frac {\pi ^{2}}{6}}} . In general, for p > 1 , k = 1 {\displaystyle p>1,k=1} , the series is equal to the Riemann zeta function applied to p {\displaystyle p} , that is ζ ( p ) {\displaystyle \zeta (p)} .
If the series ∑ n = 1 ∞ b n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }b_{n}} is an absolutely convergent series and | a n | ≤ | b n | {\displaystyle |a_{n}|\leq |b_{n}|} for sufficiently large n , then the series ∑ n = 1 ∞ a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}} converges absolutely.
If { a n } , { b n } > 0 {\displaystyle \{a_{n}\},\{b_{n}\}>0} , (that is, each element of the two sequences is positive) and the limit lim n → ∞ a n b n {\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{b_{n}}}} exists, is finite and non-zero, then either both series converge or both series diverge.
Let { a n } {\displaystyle \left\{a_{n}\right\}} be a non-negative non-increasing sequence. Then the sum A = ∑ n = 1 ∞ a n {\displaystyle A=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}} converges if and only if the sum A ∗ = ∑ n = 0 ∞ 2 n a 2 n {\displaystyle A^{*}=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }2^{n}a_{2^{n}}} converges. Moreover, if they converge, then A ≤ A ∗ ≤ 2 A {\displaystyle A\leq A^{*}\leq 2A} holds.
Suppose the following statements are true:
Then ∑ a n b n {\displaystyle \sum a_{n}b_{n}} is also convergent.
Every absolutely convergent series converges.
Then ∑ n = 1 ∞ ( − 1 ) n a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}a_{n}} and ∑ n = 1 ∞ ( − 1 ) n + 1 a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }(-1)^{n+1}a_{n}} are convergent series. This test is also known as the Leibniz criterion.
If { a n } {\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}} is a sequence of real numbers and { b n } {\displaystyle \{b_{n}\}} a sequence of complex numbers satisfying
where M is some constant, then the series
converges.
A series ∑ i = 0 ∞ a i {\displaystyle \sum _{i=0}^{\infty }a_{i}} is convergent if and only if for every ε > 0 {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} there is a natural number N such that
holds for all n > N and all p ≥ 1.
Let ( a n ) n ≥ 1 {\displaystyle (a_{n})_{n\geq 1}} and ( b n ) n ≥ 1 {\displaystyle (b_{n})_{n\geq 1}} be two sequences of real numbers. Assume that ( b n ) n ≥ 1 {\displaystyle (b_{n})_{n\geq 1}} is a strictly monotone and divergent sequence and the following limit exists:
Then, the limit
Suppose that (fn) is a sequence of real- or complex-valued functions defined on a set A, and that there is a sequence of non-negative numbers (Mn) satisfying the conditions
Then the series
converges absolutely and uniformly on A.
The ratio test may be inconclusive when the limit of the ratio is 1. Extensions to the ratio test, however, sometimes allows one to deal with this case.
Let { an } be a sequence of positive numbers.
Define
If
exists there are three possibilities:
An alternative formulation of this test is as follows. Let { an } be a series of real numbers. Then if b > 1 and K (a natural number) exist such that
for all n > K then the series {an} is convergent.
exists, there are three possibilities:23
Let { an } be a sequence of positive numbers. If a n a n + 1 = 1 + α n + O ( 1 / n β ) {\displaystyle {\frac {a_{n}}{a_{n+1}}}=1+{\frac {\alpha }{n}}+O(1/n^{\beta })} for some β > 1, then ∑ a n {\displaystyle \sum a_{n}} converges if α > 1 and diverges if α ≤ 1.4
Let { an } be a sequence of positive numbers. Then:567
(1) ∑ a n {\displaystyle \sum a_{n}} converges if and only if there is a sequence b n {\displaystyle b_{n}} of positive numbers and a real number c > 0 such that b k ( a k / a k + 1 ) − b k + 1 ≥ c {\displaystyle b_{k}(a_{k}/a_{k+1})-b_{k+1}\geq c} .
(2) ∑ a n {\displaystyle \sum a_{n}} diverges if and only if there is a sequence b n {\displaystyle b_{n}} of positive numbers such that b k ( a k / a k + 1 ) − b k + 1 ≤ 0 {\displaystyle b_{k}(a_{k}/a_{k+1})-b_{k+1}\leq 0}
and ∑ 1 / b n {\displaystyle \sum 1/b_{n}} diverges.
Let ∑ n = 1 ∞ a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}} be an infinite series with real terms and let f : R → R {\displaystyle f:\mathbb {R} \to \mathbb {R} } be any real function such that f ( 1 / n ) = a n {\displaystyle f(1/n)=a_{n}} for all positive integers n and the second derivative f ″ {\displaystyle f''} exists at x = 0 {\displaystyle x=0} . Then ∑ n = 1 ∞ a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}} converges absolutely if f ( 0 ) = f ′ ( 0 ) = 0 {\displaystyle f(0)=f'(0)=0} and diverges otherwise.8
Consider the series
Cauchy condensation test implies that (i) is finitely convergent if
is finitely convergent. Since
(ii) is a geometric series with ratio 2 ( 1 − α ) {\displaystyle 2^{(1-\alpha )}} . (ii) is finitely convergent if its ratio is less than one (namely α > 1 {\displaystyle \alpha >1} ). Thus, (i) is finitely convergent if and only if α > 1 {\displaystyle \alpha >1} .
While most of the tests deal with the convergence of infinite series, they can also be used to show the convergence or divergence of infinite products. This can be achieved using following theorem: Let { a n } n = 1 ∞ {\displaystyle \left\{a_{n}\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty }} be a sequence of positive numbers. Then the infinite product ∏ n = 1 ∞ ( 1 + a n ) {\displaystyle \prod _{n=1}^{\infty }(1+a_{n})} converges if and only if the series ∑ n = 1 ∞ a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}} converges. Also similarly, if 0 ≤ a n < 1 {\displaystyle 0\leq a_{n}<1} holds, then ∏ n = 1 ∞ ( 1 − a n ) {\displaystyle \prod _{n=1}^{\infty }(1-a_{n})} approaches a non-zero limit if and only if the series ∑ n = 1 ∞ a n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}} converges .
This can be proved by taking the logarithm of the product and using limit comparison test.9
Wachsmuth, Bert G. "MathCS.org - Real Analysis: Ratio Test". www.mathcs.org. http://www.mathcs.org/analysis/reals/numser/t_ratio.html ↩
František Ďuriš, Infinite series: Convergence tests, pp. 24–9. Bachelor's thesis. http://oldwww.dcs.fmph.uniba.sk/bakalarky/obhajene/getfile.php/new.pdf?id=90&fid=228&type=application%2Fpdf ↩
Weisstein, Eric W. "Bertrand's Test". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2020-04-16. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/BertrandsTest.html ↩
* "Gauss criterion", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994] https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Gauss_criterion ↩
"Über die Convergenz und Divergenz der unendlichen Reihen". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 1835 (13): 171–184. 1835-01-01. doi:10.1515/crll.1835.13.171. ISSN 0075-4102. S2CID 121050774. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crll.1835.13.171/html ↩
Tong, Jingcheng (1994). "Kummer's Test Gives Characterizations for Convergence or Divergence of all Positive Series". The American Mathematical Monthly. 101 (5): 450–452. doi:10.2307/2974907. JSTOR 2974907. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2974907 ↩
Samelson, Hans (1995). "More on Kummer's Test". The American Mathematical Monthly. 102 (9): 817–818. doi:10.1080/00029890.1995.12004667. ISSN 0002-9890. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029890.1995.12004667 ↩
Abu-Mostafa, Yaser (1984). "A Differentiation Test for Absolute Convergence" (PDF). Mathematics Magazine. 57 (4): 228–231. doi:10.1080/0025570X.1984.11977116. https://work.caltech.edu/paper/Abu-Mostafa17280.pdf ↩
Belk, Jim (26 January 2008). "Convergence of Infinite Products". https://cornellmath.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/convergence-of-infinite-products/ ↩