For the standard form of the Tukey lambda distribution, the quantile function, Q ( p ) , {\displaystyle ~Q(p)~,} (i.e. the inverse function to the cumulative distribution function) and the quantile density function, q = d Q d p , {\displaystyle ~q={\frac {\ \operatorname {d} Q\ }{\operatorname {d} p}}\ ,} are
For most values of the shape parameter, λ, the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) must be computed numerically. The Tukey lambda distribution has a simple, closed form for the CDF and / or PDF only for a few exceptional values of the shape parameter, for example: λ ∈ { 2, 1, 1 /2, 0 } (see uniform distribution [ cases λ = 1 and λ = 2 ] and the logistic distribution [ case λ = 0 ].
However, for any value of λ both the CDF and PDF can be tabulated for any number of cumulative probabilities, p, using the quantile function Q to calculate the value x, for each cumulative probability p, with the probability density given by 1/q, the reciprocal of the quantile density function. As is the usual case with statistical distributions, the Tukey lambda distribution can readily be used by looking up values in a prepared table.
The Tukey lambda distribution is symmetric around zero, therefore the expected value of this distribution, if it exists, is equal to zero. The variance exists for λ > − 1 /2 , and except when λ = 0 , is given by the formula
More generally, the n-th order moment is finite when λ > −1 /n and is expressed (except when λ = 0 ) in terms of the beta function Β(x,y) :
Due to symmetry of the density function, all moments of odd orders, if they exist, are equal to zero.
Differently from the central moments, L-moments can be expressed in a closed form. For λ > − 1 , {\displaystyle \lambda >-1\ ,} the r {\displaystyle \ r} th L-moment, ℓ r , {\displaystyle \ \ell _{r}\ ,} is given by1
The first six L-moments can be presented as follows:2
The Tukey lambda distribution is actually a family of distributions that can approximate a number of common distributions. For example,
The most common use of this distribution is to generate a Tukey lambda PPCC plot of a data set. Based on the value for λ with best correlation, as shown on the PPCC plot, an appropriate model for the data is suggested. For example, if the best-fit of the curve to the data occurs for a value of λ at or near 0.14, then empirically the data could be well-modeled with a normal distribution. Values of λ less than 0.14 suggests a heavier-tailed distribution.
A milepost at λ = 0 (logistic) would indicate quite fat tails, with the extreme limit at λ = −1 , approximating Cauchy and small sample versions of the Student's t. That is, as the best-fit value of λ varies from thin tails at 0.14 towards fat tails −1, a bell-shaped PDF with increasingly heavy tails is suggested. Similarly, an optimal curve-fit value of λ greater than 0.14 suggests a distribution with exceptionally thin tails (based on the point of view that the normal distribution itself is thin-tailed to begin with; the exponential distribution is often chosen as the exemplar of tails intermediate between fat and thin).
Except for values of λ approaching 0 and those below, all the PDF functions discussed have finite support, between −1 /|λ| and +1 / |λ| .
Since the Tukey lambda distribution is a symmetric distribution, the use of the Tukey lambda PPCC plot to determine a reasonable distribution to model the data only applies to symmetric distributions. A histogram of the data should provide evidence as to whether the data can be reasonably modeled with a symmetric distribution.3
This article incorporates public domain material from the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Karvanen, Juha; Nuutinen, Arto (2008). "Characterizing the generalized lambda distribution by L-moments". Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 52 (4): 1971–1983. arXiv:math/0701405. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.021. S2CID 939977. /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩
Joiner, Brian L.; Rosenblatt, Joan R. (1971). "Some properties of the range in samples from Tukey's symmetric lambda distributions". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 66 (334): 394–399. doi:10.2307/2283943. JSTOR 2283943. /wiki/Journal_of_the_American_Statistical_Association ↩