Given:
First calculate the altitude of the celestial body H c {\displaystyle Hc} using the equation of circle of equal altitude:
sin ( H c ) = sin ( L a t ) ⋅ sin ( D e c ) + cos ( L a t ) ⋅ cos ( D e c ) ⋅ cos ( L H A ) . {\displaystyle \sin(Hc)=\sin(Lat)\cdot \sin(Dec)+\cos(Lat)\cdot \cos(Dec)\cdot \cos(LHA).}
The azimuth Z {\displaystyle Z} or Z n {\displaystyle Zn} (Zn=0 at North, measured eastward) is then calculated by:
cos ( Z ) = sin ( D e c ) − sin ( H c ) ⋅ sin ( L a t ) cos ( H c ) ⋅ cos ( L a t ) = sin ( D e c ) cos ( H c ) ⋅ cos ( L a t ) − tan ( H c ) ⋅ tan ( L a t ) . {\displaystyle \cos(Z)={\frac {\sin(Dec)-\sin(Hc)\cdot \sin(Lat)}{\cos(Hc)\cdot \cos(Lat)}}={\frac {\sin(Dec)}{\cos(Hc)\cdot \cos(Lat)}}-\tan(Hc)\cdot \tan(Lat).}
These values are contrasted with the observed altitude H o {\displaystyle Ho} . H o {\displaystyle Ho} , Z {\displaystyle Z} , and H c {\displaystyle Hc} are the three inputs to the intercept method (Marcq St Hilaire method), which uses the difference in observed and calculated altitudes to ascertain one's relative location to the assumed point.
The methods included are:
This method is a practical procedure to reduce celestial sights with the needed accuracy, without using electronic tools such as calculator or a computer. And it could serve as a backup in case of malfunction of the positioning system aboard.
The first approach of a compact and concise method was published by R. Doniol in 19554 and involved haversines. The altitude is derived from sin ( H c ) = n − a ⋅ ( m + n ) {\displaystyle \sin(Hc)=n-a\cdot (m+n)} , in which n = cos ( L a t − D e c ) {\displaystyle n=\cos(Lat-Dec)} , m = cos ( L a t + D e c ) {\displaystyle m=\cos(Lat+Dec)} , a = hav ( L H A ) {\displaystyle a=\operatorname {hav} (LHA)} .
The calculation is:
A practical and friendly method using only haversines was developed between 2014 and 2015,5 and published in NavList.
A compact expression for the altitude was derived6 using haversines, hav ( ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {hav} ()} , for all the terms of the equation: hav ( Z D ) = hav ( L a t − D e c ) + ( 1 − hav ( L a t − D e c ) − hav ( L a t + D e c ) ) ⋅ hav ( L H A ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {hav} (ZD)=\operatorname {hav} (Lat-Dec)+\left(1-\operatorname {hav} (Lat-Dec)-\operatorname {hav} (Lat+Dec)\right)\cdot \operatorname {hav} (LHA)}
where Z D {\displaystyle ZD} is the zenith distance,
H c = ( 90 ∘ − Z D ) {\displaystyle Hc=(90^{\circ }-ZD)} is the calculated altitude.
The algorithm if absolute values are used is:
For the azimuth a diagram7 was developed for a faster solution without calculation, and with an accuracy of 1°.
This diagram could be used also for star identification.8
An ambiguity in the value of azimuth may arise since in the diagram 0 ∘ ⩽ Z ⩽ 90 ∘ {\displaystyle 0^{\circ }\leqslant Z\leqslant 90^{\circ }} . Z {\displaystyle Z} is E↔W as the name of the meridian angle, but the N↕S name is not determined. In most situations azimuth ambiguities are resolved simply by observation.
When there are reasons for doubt or for the purpose of checking the following formula9 should be used:
hav ( Z ) = hav ( 90 ∘ ± | D e c | ) − hav ( | L a t | − H c ) 1 − hav ( | L a t | − H c ) − hav ( | L a t | + H c ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {hav} (Z)={\frac {\operatorname {hav} (90^{\circ }\pm \vert Dec\vert )-\operatorname {hav} (\vert Lat\vert -Hc)}{1-\operatorname {hav} (\vert Lat\vert -Hc)-\operatorname {hav} (\vert Lat\vert +Hc)}}}
This computation of the altitude and the azimuth needs a haversine table. For a precision of 1 minute of arc, a four figure table is enough.1011
The American Practical Navigator (2002) /wiki/The_American_Practical_Navigator ↩
Pub. 249 Volume 1. Stars Archived 2020-11-12 at the Wayback Machine; Pub. 249 Volume 2. Latitudes 0° to 39° Archived 2022-01-22 at the Wayback Machine; Pub. 249 Volume 3. Latitudes 40° to 89° Archived 2019-07-13 at the Wayback Machine https://www.thenauticalalmanac.com/Pub.%20249%20Vol.%201-2020-Dec.pdf ↩
Pub. 229 Volume 1. Latitudes 0° to 15° Archived 2017-01-26 at the Wayback Machine; Pub. 229 Volume 2. Latitudes 15° to 30°; Pub. 229 Volume 3. Latitudes 30° to 45°; Pub. 229 Volume 4. Latitudes 45° to 60° Archived 2017-01-30 at the Wayback Machine; Pub. 229 Volume 5. Latitudes 60° to 75° Archived 2017-01-26 at the Wayback Machine; Pub. 229 Volume 6. Latitudes 75° to 90° Archived 2017-02-11 at the Wayback Machine. https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SRTM/Pub229/Vol_1/Pub229Vol1.pdf ↩
Table de point miniature (Hauteur et azimut), by R. Doniol, Navigation IFN Vol. III Nº 10, Avril 1955 Paper http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Table-De-Point-Miniature-R-Doniol-FrankReed-jul-2015-g32063 ↩
Rudzinski, Greg (July 2015). "Ultra compact sight reduction". Ocean Navigator (227). Ix, Hanno. Portland, ME, USA: Navigator Publishing LLC: 42–43. ISSN 0886-0149. Retrieved 2015-11-07. http://issuu.com/navigatorpublishing/docs/on227_download_edition ↩
Altitude haversine formula by Hanno Ix http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Longhand-Sight-Reduction-HannoIx-nov-2014-g29121 http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Longhand-Sight-Reduction-HannoIx-nov-2014-g29121 ↩
Azimuth diagram by Hanno Ix. http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Gregs-article-havDoniol-Ocean-Navigator-HannoIx-jun-2015-g31689 http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Gregs-article-havDoniol-Ocean-Navigator-HannoIx-jun-2015-g31689 ↩
Hc by Azimuth Diagram http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Hc-Azimuth-Diagram-finally-HannoIx-aug-2013-g24772 http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Hc-Azimuth-Diagram-finally-HannoIx-aug-2013-g24772 ↩
Azimuth haversine formula by Lars Bergman http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Longhand-Sight-Reduction-Bergman-nov-2014-g29441 http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Longhand-Sight-Reduction-Bergman-nov-2014-g29441 ↩
"NavList: Re: Longhand Sight Reduction (129172)". http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Longhand-Sight-Reduction-HannoIx-nov-2014-g29172 ↩
Natural-Haversine 4-place Table; PDF; 51kB https://yadi.sk/i/4MmOYyXhUshbxA ↩