Open–closed principle

<h2 id="meyers-openclosed-principle">Meyer's open–closed principle</h2>
<p><a href="/facts/Bertrand_Meyer/fHywGneP">Bertrand Meyer</a> is generally credited for having originated the term <i>open–closed principle</i>,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:2" href="#fn:2"><sup>2</sup></a> which appeared in his 1988 book <i><a href="/facts/Object-Oriented_Software_Construction/u0uN1QpV">Object-Oriented Software Construction</a></i>.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a>: 23 
</p>
<blockquote>
<ul><li>A module will be said to be open if it is still available for extension. For example, it should be possible to add fields to the data structures it contains, or new elements to the set of functions it performs.</li>
<li>A module will be said to be closed if [it] is available for use by other modules. This assumes that the module has been given a well-defined, stable description (the interface in the sense of information hiding).</li></ul>
</blockquote>
<p>At the time Meyer was writing, adding fields or functions to a library inevitably required changes to any programs depending on that library.  Meyer's proposed solution to this problem relied on the notion of object-oriented <a href="/facts/Inheritance_(object-oriented_programming)/a7R1xv8n">inheritance</a> (specifically <a href="/facts/Implementation_inheritance/a7R1xv8n">implementation inheritance</a>):<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a>: 229 
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A class is closed, since it may be compiled, stored in a library, <a href="/facts/Baseline_(configuration_management)/n7vaav6A">baselined</a>, and used by client classes. But it is also open, since any new class may use it as parent, adding new features. When a descendant class is defined, there is no need to change the original or to disturb its clients.
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2 id="polymorphic-openclosed-principle">Polymorphic open–closed principle</h2>
<p>During the 1990s, the open–closed principle became popularly redefined to refer to the use of <a href="/facts/Abstraction_(computer_science)/hAnxmJle">abstracted</a> interfaces, where the implementations can be changed and multiple implementations could be created and <a href="/facts/Polymorphism_(computer_science)/S3cCKsVT">polymorphically</a> substituted for each other.
</p><p>In contrast to Meyer's usage, this definition advocates inheritance from <a href="/facts/Abstract_base_class/zvzkSAtE">abstract base classes</a>. Interface specifications can be reused through inheritance but implementation need not be. The existing interface is closed to modifications and new implementations must, at a minimum, implement that interface.
</p><p><a href="/facts/Robert_C._Martin/JBbAPbfr">Robert C. Martin</a>'s 1996 article "The Open-Closed Principle"<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5"><sup>5</sup></a> was one of the seminal writings to take this approach. In 2001, <a href="/facts/Craig_Larman/ErpJVf5a">Craig Larman</a> related the open–closed principle to the pattern by <a href="/facts/Alistair_Cockburn/7qvjETe7">Alistair Cockburn</a> called <i>Protected Variations</i>, and to the <a href="/facts/David_Parnas/1zPw1V0m">David Parnas</a> discussion of <i><a href="/facts/Information_hiding/dnSDPMaz">information hiding</a></i>.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6"><sup>6</sup></a>
</p>
<h2 id="see-also">See also</h2>
<ul><li><a href="/facts/SOLID_(object-oriented_design)/0lkvEsb3">SOLID</a> – the "O" in "SOLID" represents the open–closed principle</li>
<li><a href="/facts/Robustness_principle/Mw0PygBF">Robustness principle</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="external-links">External links</h2>
<ul><li><a href="http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.UncleBob.PrinciplesOfOod">The Principles of OOD</a></li>
<li><a href="https://blog.symprise.net/articles/open-closed-principle-concerns-about-change-in-software-design">The Open/Closed Principle: Concerns about Change in Software Design</a></li>
<li><a href="https://medium.com/@wrong.about/the-open-closed-principle-c3dc45419784">The Open-Closed Principle -- and What Hides Behind It</a></li></ul>

<h2 id="references">References</h2>

<ol>
<li id="fn:1"><p>Meyer, Bertrand (1988). Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-629049-3. <a href="0-13-629049-3" target="_blank">0-13-629049-3</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:2"><p>Robert C. Martin "The Open-Closed Principle", C++ Report, January 1996 Archived August 22, 2006, at the Wayback Machine <a href="/wiki/Robert_C._Martin" target="_blank">/wiki/Robert_C._Martin</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:3"><p>Meyer, Bertrand (1988). Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-629049-3. <a href="0-13-629049-3" target="_blank">0-13-629049-3</a> <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:4"><p>Meyer, Bertrand (1988). Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-629049-3. <a href="0-13-629049-3" target="_blank">0-13-629049-3</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:5"><p>Robert C. Martin "The Open-Closed Principle", C++ Report, January 1996 Archived August 22, 2006, at the Wayback Machine <a href="/wiki/Robert_C._Martin" target="_blank">/wiki/Robert_C._Martin</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
<li id="fn:6"><p>Larman, Craig (May–June 2001). "Protected Variation: The Importance of Being Closed" (PDF). IEEE Software. 18 (2). IEEE: 89–91. doi:10.1109/52.922731. <a href="http://codecourse.sourceforge.net/materials/The-Importance-of-Being-Closed.pdf" target="_blank">http://codecourse.sourceforge.net/materials/The-Importance-of-Being-Closed.pdf</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li>
</ol>

Open–closed principle open-in-new

Open–closed principle