Meho & Spurgin (2005) found that in a list of 2,625 items published between 1982 and 2002 by 68 faculty members of 18 schools of library and information science, only 10 databases provided significant coverage of the LIS literature. Data showed that Library Literature and Information Science (LLIS) indexes the highest percentage of LIS faculty publications (31.2%), followed by INSPEC (30.6%), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)(29.6%), and LISA (27.2%). LISA is thus the fourth most comprehensive in this study.3
Factsheet from Proquest: http://www.csa.com/factsheets/lisa-set-c.php
"Library & information science abstracts". NLA Catalog. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2488422 ↩
"Cambridge Information Group Acquires R.R. Bowker" (Press release). 31 August 2001. https://librarytechnology.org/document/24817 ↩
Meho, Lokman I.; Spurgin, Kristina M. (October 2005). "Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56 (12): 1314–1331. doi:10.1002/asi.20227. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩