There are many well developed techniques for dealing with the response of linear time invariant systems, such as Laplace and Fourier transforms. However, these techniques are not strictly valid for time-varying systems. A system undergoing slow time variation in comparison to its time constants can usually be considered to be time invariant: they are close to time invariant on a small scale. An example of this is the aging and wear of electronic components, which happens on a scale of years, and thus does not result in any behaviour qualitatively different from that observed in a time invariant system: day-to-day, they are effectively time invariant, though year to year, the parameters may change. Other linear time variant systems may behave more like nonlinear systems, if the system changes quickly – significantly differing between measurements.
The following things can be said about a time-variant system:
Linear-time variant (LTV) systems are the ones whose parameters vary with time according to previously specified laws. Mathematically, there is a well defined dependence of the system over time and over the input parameters that change over time.
In order to solve time-variant systems, the algebraic methods consider initial conditions of the system i.e. whether the system is zero-input or non-zero input system.
The following time varying systems cannot be modelled by assuming that they are time invariant:
Cherniakov, Mikhail (2003). An Introduction to Parametric Digital Filters and Oscillators. Wiley. pp. 47–49. ISBN 978-0470851043. 978-0470851043 ↩
Sung, Taehong; Yoon, Sang; Kim, Kyung (2015-07-13). "A Mathematical Model of Hourly Solar Radiation in Varying Weather Conditions for a Dynamic Simulation of the Solar Organic Rankine Cycle". Energies. 8 (7): 7058–7069. doi:10.3390/en8077058. ISSN 1996-1073. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fen8077058 ↩
Alzahrani, Ahmad; Shamsi, Pourya; Dagli, Cihan; Ferdowsi, Mehdi (2017). "Solar Irradiance Forecasting Using Deep Neural Networks". Procedia Computer Science. 114: 304–313. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.045. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.procs.2017.09.045 ↩