Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
Compound prism
open-in-new
<h2 id="doublet">Doublet</h2> <p>The simplest compound prism is a doublet, consisting of two elements in contact, as shown in the figure at right. A ray of light passing through the prism is refracted at the first air-glass interface, again at the interface between the two glasses, and a final time at the exiting glass-air interface. The deviation angle δ {\displaystyle \delta } of the ray is given by the difference in ray angle between the incident ray and the exiting ray: δ = θ 0 − θ 4 {\displaystyle \delta =\theta _{0}-\theta _{4}} . While one can produce direct vision dispersion from doublet prisms, there is typically significant displacement of the beam (shown as a separation between the two dashed horizontal lines in the <i>y</i> direction). Mathematically, one can calculate δ {\displaystyle \delta } by concatenating the Snell's law equations at each interface,<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6"><sup>6</sup></a> </p> θ 1 = θ 0 − β 1 θ 3 = θ 2 ′ − α 2 θ 1 ′ = arcsin ( 1 n 1 sin θ 1 ) θ 3 ′ = arcsin ( n 2 sin θ 3 ) θ 2 = θ 1 ′ − α 1 θ 4 = θ 3 ′ + 1 2 α 2 θ 2 ′ = arcsin ( n 1 n 2 sin θ 2 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{1}&=\theta _{0}-\beta _{1}&\theta _{3}&=\theta '_{2}-\alpha _{2}\\\theta '_{1}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {1}{n_{1}}}\,\sin \theta _{1})\quad &\theta '_{3}&=\arcsin(n_{2}\,\sin \theta _{3})\\\theta _{2}&=\theta '_{1}-\alpha _{1}&\theta _{4}&=\theta '_{3}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha _{2}\\\theta '_{2}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {n_{1}}{n_{2}}}\,\sin \theta _{2})\end{aligned}}} <p>so that the deviation angle is a <a href="/facts/Nonlinear_equation/4aYItALC">nonlinear function</a> of the glass refractive indices n 1 ( λ ) {\displaystyle n_{1}(\lambda )} and n 2 ( λ ) {\displaystyle n_{2}(\lambda )} , the prism elements' apex angles α 1 {\displaystyle \alpha _{1}} and α 2 {\displaystyle \alpha _{2}} , and the angle of incidence θ 0 {\displaystyle \theta _{0}} of the ray. Note that α i {\displaystyle \alpha _{i}} indicates that the prism is inverted (the apex points downward). </p><p>If the angle of incidence θ 0 {\displaystyle \theta _{0}} and prism apex angle α {\displaystyle \alpha } are both small, then sin θ ≈ θ {\displaystyle \sin \theta \approx \theta } and arcsin ( x ) ≈ x {\displaystyle {\text{arcsin}}(x)\approx x} , so that the nonlinear equation in the deviation angle δ {\displaystyle \delta } can be approximated by the linear form </p> δ ( λ ) = [ n 1 ( λ ) − 1 ] α 1 + [ n 2 ( λ ) − 1 ] α 2 . {\displaystyle \delta (\lambda )={\big [}n_{1}(\lambda )-1{\big ]}\alpha _{1}+{\big [}n_{2}(\lambda )-1{\big ]}\alpha _{2}\ .} <p>(See also <a href="/facts/Prism_(optics)/eodBFF70">prism deviation and dispersion</a>.) If we further assume that the wavelength dependence to the refractive index is approximately linear, then the dispersion can be written as </p> Δ = δ 1 ( λ ¯ ) V 1 + δ 2 ( λ ¯ ) V 2 , {\displaystyle \Delta ={\frac {\delta _{1}({\bar {\lambda }})}{V_{1}}}+{\frac {\delta _{2}({\bar {\lambda }})}{V_{2}}}\ ,} <p>where δ i {\displaystyle \delta _{i}} and V i {\displaystyle V_{i}} are the dispersion and <a href="/facts/Abbe_number/lcWFqTw4">Abbe number</a> of element i {\displaystyle i} within the compound prism, V i = ( n ¯ − 1 ) / ( n F − n C ) {\displaystyle V_{i}=({\bar {n}}-1)/(n_{F}-n_{C})} . The central wavelength of the spectrum is denoted λ ¯ {\displaystyle {\bar {\lambda }}} . </p><p>Doublet prisms are often used for direct-vision dispersion. In order to design such a prism, we let δ ¯ = 0 {\displaystyle {\bar {\delta }}=0} , and simultaneously solving equations δ {\displaystyle \delta } and Δ {\displaystyle \Delta } gives </p> δ 1 ( λ ¯ ) = − δ 2 ( λ ¯ ) = − Δ ( 1 V 2 − 1 V 1 ) − 1 , {\displaystyle \delta _{1}({\bar {\lambda }})=-\delta _{2}({\bar {\lambda }})=-\Delta {\Big (}{\frac {1}{V_{2}}}-{\frac {1}{V_{1}}}{\Big )}^{-1}\ ,} <p>from which one can obtain the element apex angles α 1 {\displaystyle \alpha _{1}} and α 2 {\displaystyle \alpha _{2}} from the mean refractive indices of the glasses chosen: </p> α 1 = Δ n ¯ 1 − 1 ( 1 V 1 − 1 V 2 ) − 1 , α 2 = Δ n ¯ 2 − 1 ( 1 V 2 − 1 V 1 ) − 1 . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\alpha _{1}&={\frac {\Delta }{{\bar {n}}_{1}-1}}{\Big (}{\frac {1}{V_{1}}}-{\frac {1}{V_{2}}}{\Big )}^{-1}\ ,\\\alpha _{2}&={\frac {\Delta }{{\bar {n}}_{2}-1}}{\Big (}{\frac {1}{V_{2}}}-{\frac {1}{V_{1}}}{\Big )}^{-1}\ .\end{aligned}}} <p>Note that this formula is only accurate under the small angle approximation. </p> <h2 id="double-amici">Double-Amici</h2> <p>While the doublet prism is the simplest compound prism type, the <a href="/facts/Amici_prism/SeSwJEFX">double-Amici prism</a> is much more common. This prism is a three-element system (a triplet), in which the first and third elements share both the same glass and the same apex angles. The design layout is thus symmetric about the plane passing through the center of its second element. Due to its symmetry, the linear design equations (under the small angle approximation) for the double-Amici prism differ from those of the doublet prism only by a factor of 2 in front of the first term in each equation:<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7"><sup>7</sup></a> </p> δ ( λ ¯ ) = 2 δ 1 ( λ ¯ ) + δ 2 ( λ ¯ ) = 2 ( n ¯ 1 − 1 ) α 1 + ( n ¯ 2 − 1 ) α 2 , Δ = 2 δ 1 ( λ ¯ ) V 1 + δ 2 ( λ ¯ ) V 2 . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\delta ({\bar {\lambda }})&=2\delta _{1}({\bar {\lambda }})+\delta _{2}({\bar {\lambda }})=2{\big (}{\bar {n}}_{1}-1)\alpha _{1}+{\big (}{\bar {n}}_{2}-1)\alpha _{2}\ ,\\\Delta &=2{\frac {\delta _{1}({\bar {\lambda }})}{V_{1}}}+{\frac {\delta _{2}({\bar {\lambda }})}{V_{2}}}\ .\end{aligned}}} <p>Thus, we can derive the expressions for the prism angles using these linear equations, giving </p> α 1 = Δ 2 ( n ¯ 1 − 1 ) ( 1 V 1 − 1 V 2 ) − 1 , α 2 = Δ n ¯ 2 − 1 ( 1 V 2 − 1 V 1 ) − 1 . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\alpha _{1}&={\frac {\Delta }{2({\bar {n}}_{1}-1)}}{\Big (}{\frac {1}{V_{1}}}-{\frac {1}{V_{2}}}{\Big )}^{-1}\ ,\\\alpha _{2}&={\frac {\Delta }{{\bar {n}}_{2}-1}}{\Big (}{\frac {1}{V_{2}}}-{\frac {1}{V_{1}}}{\Big )}^{-1}\ .\end{aligned}}} <p>The exact nonlinear equation for the deviation angle δ {\displaystyle \delta } is obtained by concatenating the refraction equations obtained at each interface: </p> θ 1 = θ 0 + α 1 − 1 2 α 2 θ 3 ′ = arcsin ( n 2 n 1 sin θ 3 ) θ 1 ′ = arcsin ( 1 n 1 sin θ 1 ) θ 4 = θ 3 ′ − α 1 θ 2 = θ 1 ′ − α 1 θ 4 ′ = arcsin ( n 1 sin θ 4 ) θ 2 ′ = arcsin ( n 1 n 2 sin θ 2 ) θ 5 = θ 4 ′ + α 1 − 1 2 α 2 θ 3 = θ 2 ′ − α 2 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{1}&=\theta _{0}+\alpha _{1}-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha _{2}&\theta '_{3}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {n_{2}}{n_{1}}}\,\sin \theta _{3})\\\theta '_{1}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {1}{n_{1}}}\,\sin \theta _{1})\quad &\theta _{4}&=\theta '_{3}-\alpha _{1}\\\theta _{2}&=\theta '_{1}-\alpha _{1}&\theta '_{4}&=\arcsin(n_{1}\,\sin \theta _{4})\\\theta '_{2}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {n_{1}}{n_{2}}}\,\sin \theta _{2})&\theta _{5}&=\theta '_{4}+\alpha _{1}-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha _{2}\\\theta _{3}&=\theta '_{2}-\alpha _{2}\end{aligned}}} <p>The ray deviation angle is given by δ = θ 0 − θ 5 {\displaystyle \delta =\theta _{0}-\theta _{5}} . </p> <h2 id="triplet">Triplet</h2> <p>The double-Amici prism is a symmetric form of the more general triplet prism, in which the apex angles and glasses of the two outer elements may differ (see the figure at right). Although triplet prisms are rarely found in optical systems, their added degrees of freedom beyond the double-Amici design allow for improved dispersion linearity. The deviation angle of the triplet prism is obtained by concatenating the refraction equations at each interface:<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8"><sup>8</sup></a><a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:9" href="#fn:9"><sup>9</sup></a> </p> θ 1 = θ 0 + α 1 + 1 2 α 2 θ 3 ′ = arcsin ( n 2 n 3 sin θ 3 ) θ 1 ′ = arcsin ( 1 n 1 sin θ 1 ) θ 4 = θ 3 ′ − α 3 θ 2 = θ 1 ′ − α 1 θ 4 ′ = arcsin ( n 3 sin θ 4 ) θ 2 ′ = arcsin ( n 1 n 2 sin θ 2 ) θ 5 = θ 4 ′ + α 3 + 1 2 α 2 θ 3 = θ 2 ′ − α 2 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{1}&=\theta _{0}+\alpha _{1}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha _{2}&\theta '_{3}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {n_{2}}{n_{3}}}\,\sin \theta _{3})\\\theta '_{1}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {1}{n_{1}}}\,\sin \theta _{1})\quad &\theta _{4}&=\theta '_{3}-\alpha _{3}\\\theta _{2}&=\theta '_{1}-\alpha _{1}&\theta '_{4}&=\arcsin(n_{3}\,\sin \theta _{4})\\\theta '_{2}&=\arcsin({\tfrac {n_{1}}{n_{2}}}\,\sin \theta _{2})&\theta _{5}&=\theta '_{4}+\alpha _{3}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha _{2}\\\theta _{3}&=\theta '_{2}-\alpha _{2}\end{aligned}}} <p>Here to the ray deviation angle is given by δ = θ 0 − θ 5 {\displaystyle \delta =\theta _{0}-\theta _{5}} . </p> <h2 id="see-also">See also</h2> <ul><li><a href="/facts/Dispersive_prism/87fCcXBo">Dispersive prism</a></li></ul> <h2 id="references">References</h2> <ol> <li id="fn:1"><p>John Browning, "Note on the use of compound prisms," MNRAS 31: 203-205 (1871). <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:2"><p>Nathan Hagen and Tomasz S. Tkaczyk, "Compound prism design principles, I," Appl. Opt. 50: 4998-5011 (2011). <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004998" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004998</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:3"><p>Charles G. Abbott and Frederick E. Fowle, Jr., "A prism of uniform dispersion," Astrophys. J. 11: 135-139 (1900). <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:4"><p>Bradley D. Duncan, Philip J. Bos, and Vassili Sergan, "Wide-angle achromatic prism beam steering for infrared countermeasure applications," Opt. Eng 42: 1038-1047 (2003). <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:5"><p>Zhilin Hu and Andrew M. Rollins, "Fourier domain optical coherence tomography with a linear-in-wavenumber spectrometer," Opt. Lett. 32: 3525-3527 (2007). <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:6"><p>Nathan Hagen and Tomasz S. Tkaczyk, "Compound prism design principles, I," Appl. Opt. 50: 4998-5011 (2011). <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004998" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004998</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:7"><p>Nathan Hagen and Tomasz S. Tkaczyk, "Compound prism design principles, I," Appl. Opt. 50: 4998-5011 (2011). <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004998" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004998</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:8"><p>Nathan Hagen and Tomasz S. Tkaczyk, "Compound prism design principles, II: triplet and Janssen prisms," Appl. Opt. 50: 5012-5022 (2011). <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005012" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005012</a> <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:9"><p>Nathan Hagen and Tomasz S. Tkaczyk, "Compound prism design principles, III: linear-in-wavenumber and optical coherence tomography prisms," Appl. Opt. 50: 5023-5030 (2011). <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005023" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005023</a> <a href="#fnref:9" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> </ol>