The concept of homotopy colimit3pg 4-8 is a generalization of homotopy pushouts, such as the mapping cylinder used to define a cofibration. This notion is motivated by the following observation: the (ordinary) pushout
is the space obtained by contracting the (n−1)-sphere (which is the boundary of the n-dimensional disk) to a single point. This space is homeomorphic to the n-sphere Sn. On the other hand, the pushout
is a point. Therefore, even though the (contractible) disk Dn was replaced by a point, (which is homotopy equivalent to the disk), the two pushouts are not homotopy (or weakly) equivalent.
Therefore, the pushout is not well-aligned with a principle of homotopy theory, which considers weakly equivalent spaces as carrying the same information: if one (or more) of the spaces used to form the pushout is replaced by a weakly equivalent space, the pushout is not guaranteed to stay weakly equivalent. The homotopy pushout rectifies this defect.
The homotopy pushout of two maps A ← B → C {\displaystyle A\leftarrow B\rightarrow C} of topological spaces is defined as
i.e., instead of glueing B in both A and C, two copies of a cylinder on B are glued together and their ends are glued to A and C. For example, the homotopy colimit of the diagram (whose maps are projections)
is the join X 0 ∗ X 1 {\displaystyle X_{0}*X_{1}} .
It can be shown that the homotopy pushout does not share the defect of the ordinary pushout: replacing A, B and / or C by a homotopic space, the homotopy pushout will also be homotopic. In this sense, the homotopy pushouts treats homotopic spaces as well as the (ordinary) pushout does with homeomorphic spaces.
Another useful and motivating examples of a homotopy colimit is constructing models for the homotopy colimit of the diagram
A → f X → g Y {\displaystyle A\xrightarrow {f} X\xrightarrow {g} Y}
of topological spaces. There are a number of ways to model this colimit: the first is to consider the space
[ ( A × I ) ∐ ( X × I ) ∐ Y ] / ∼ {\displaystyle \left[(A\times I)\coprod (X\times I)\coprod Y\right]/\sim }
where ∼ {\displaystyle \sim } is the equivalence relation identifying
( a , 1 ) ∼ ( f ( a ) , 0 ) ( x , 1 ) ∼ g ( x ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}(a,1)&\sim (f(a),0)\\(x,1)&\sim g(x)\end{aligned}}}
which can pictorially be described as the picture
Because we can similarly interpret the diagram above as the commutative diagram, from properties of categories, we get a commutative diagram
giving a homotopy colimit. We could guess this looks like
but notice we have introduced a new cycle to fill in the new data of the composition. This creates a technical problem which can be solved using simplicial techniques: giving a method for constructing a model for homotopy colimits. The new diagram, forming the homotopy colimit of the composition diagram pictorially is represented as
giving another model of the homotopy colimit which is homotopy equivalent to the original diagram (without the composition of g ∘ f {\displaystyle g\circ f} ) given above.
The homotopy colimit of a sequence of spaces
is the mapping telescope.4 One example computation is taking the homotopy colimit of a sequence of cofibrations. The colimit of 5pg 62 this diagram gives a homotopy colimit. This implies we could compute the homotopy colimit of any mapping telescope by replacing the maps with cofibrations.
Treating examples such as the mapping telescope and the homotopy pushout on an equal footing can be achieved by considering an I-diagram of spaces, where I is some "indexing" category. This is a functor
i.e., to each object i in I, one assigns a space Xi and maps between them, according to the maps in I. The category of such diagrams is denoted SpacesI.
There is a natural functor called the diagonal,
which sends any space X to the diagram which consists of X everywhere (and the identity of X as maps between them). In (ordinary) category theory, the right adjoint to this functor is the limit. The homotopy limit is defined by altering this situation: it is the right adjoint to
which sends a space X to the I-diagram which at some object i gives
Here I/i is the slice category (its objects are arrows j → i, where j is any object of I), N is the nerve of this category and |-| is the topological realization of this simplicial set.6
Similarly, one can define a colimit as the left adjoint to the diagonal functor Δ0 given above. To define a homotopy colimit, we must modify Δ0 in a different way. A homotopy colimit can be defined as the left adjoint to a functor Δ : Spaces → SpacesI where
where Iop is the opposite category of I. Although this is not the same as the functor Δ above, it does share the property that if the geometric realization of the nerve category (|N(-)|) is replaced with a point space, we recover the original functor Δ0.
A homotopy pullback (or homotopy fiber-product) is the dual concept of a homotopy pushout.It satisfies the universal property of a pullback up to homotopy. Concretely, given f : X → Z {\displaystyle f:X\to Z} and g : Y → Z {\displaystyle g:Y\to Z} , it can be constructed as
For example, the homotopy fiber of f : X → Y {\displaystyle f:X\to Y} over a point y is the homotopy pullback of f {\displaystyle f} along y ↪ Y {\displaystyle y\hookrightarrow Y} .8 The homotopy pullback of f {\displaystyle f} along the identity is nothing but the mapping path space of f {\displaystyle f} .
The universal property of a homotopy pullback yields the natural map X × Z Y → X × Z h Y {\displaystyle X\times _{Z}Y\to X\times _{Z}^{h}Y} , a special case of a natural map from a limit to a homotopy limit. In the case of a homotopy fiber, this map is an inclusion of a fiber to a homotopy fiber.
Given a small category I {\displaystyle I} and a diagram D : I → Top {\displaystyle D:I\to {\textbf {Top}}} , we can construct the homotopy colimit using a simplicial replacement of the diagram. This is a simplicial space, srep ( D ) ∙ {\displaystyle {\text{srep}}(D)_{\bullet }} given by the diagram9pg 16-17
where
srep ( D ) n = ∐ i 0 ← i 1 ← ⋯ ← i n D ( i n ) {\displaystyle {\text{srep}}(D)_{n}={\underset {i_{0}\leftarrow i_{1}\leftarrow \cdots \leftarrow i_{n}}{\coprod }}D(i_{n})}
given by chains of composable maps in the indexing category I {\displaystyle I} . Then, the homotopy colimit of D {\displaystyle D} can be constructed as the geometric realization of this simplicial space, so
hocolim → D = | srep ( D ) ∙ | {\displaystyle {\underset {\to }{\text{hocolim}}}D=|{\text{srep}}(D)_{\bullet }|}
Notice that this agrees with the picture given above for the composition diagram of A → X → Y {\displaystyle A\to X\to Y} .
There is always a map
Typically, this map is not a weak equivalence. For example, the homotopy pushout encountered above always maps to the ordinary pushout. This map is not typically a weak equivalence, for example the join is not weakly equivalent to the pushout of X 0 ← X 0 × X 1 → X 1 {\displaystyle X_{0}\leftarrow X_{0}\times X_{1}\rightarrow X_{1}} , which is a point.
Just as limit is used to complete a ring, holim is used to complete a spectrum.
Dugger, Daniel. "A Primer on Homotopy Colimits" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 Dec 2020. https://pages.uoregon.edu/ddugger/hocolim.pdf ↩
Grothendieck. "Pursuing Stacks". thescrivener.github.io. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 Jul 2020. Retrieved 2020-09-17. https://thescrivener.github.io/PursuingStacks/ ↩
Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, 4.G. ↩
Bousfield & Kan: Homotopy limits, Completions and Localizations, Springer, LNM 304. Section XI.3.3 ↩
Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Homotopy pullbacks https://www.home.uni-osnabrueck.de/mfrankland/Math527/Math527_0308.pdf ↩