Suppose that ( M , ω ) {\displaystyle (M,\omega )} is a symplectic manifold. Since the symplectic form ω {\displaystyle \omega } is nondegenerate, it sets up a fiberwise-linear isomorphism
ω : T M → T ∗ M , {\displaystyle \omega :TM\to T^{*}M,}
between the tangent bundle T M {\displaystyle TM} and the cotangent bundle T ∗ M {\displaystyle T^{*}M} , with the inverse
Ω : T ∗ M → T M , Ω = ω − 1 . {\displaystyle \Omega :T^{*}M\to TM,\quad \Omega =\omega ^{-1}.}
Therefore, one-forms on a symplectic manifold M {\displaystyle M} may be identified with vector fields and every differentiable function H : M → R {\displaystyle H:M\rightarrow \mathbb {R} } determines a unique vector field X H {\displaystyle X_{H}} , called the Hamiltonian vector field with the Hamiltonian H {\displaystyle H} , by defining for every vector field Y {\displaystyle Y} on M {\displaystyle M} ,
d H ( Y ) = ω ( X H , Y ) . {\displaystyle \mathrm {d} H(Y)=\omega (X_{H},Y).}
Note: Some authors define the Hamiltonian vector field with the opposite sign. One has to be mindful of varying conventions in physical and mathematical literature.
Suppose that M {\displaystyle M} is a 2 n {\displaystyle 2n} -dimensional symplectic manifold. Then locally, one may choose canonical coordinates ( q 1 , ⋯ , q n , p 1 , ⋯ , p n ) {\displaystyle (q^{1},\cdots ,q^{n},p_{1},\cdots ,p_{n})} on M {\displaystyle M} , in which the symplectic form is expressed as:2 ω = ∑ i d q i ∧ d p i , {\displaystyle \omega =\sum _{i}\mathrm {d} q^{i}\wedge \mathrm {d} p_{i},}
where d {\displaystyle \operatorname {d} } denotes the exterior derivative and ∧ {\displaystyle \wedge } denotes the exterior product. Then the Hamiltonian vector field with Hamiltonian H {\displaystyle H} takes the form:3 X H = ( ∂ H ∂ p i , − ∂ H ∂ q i ) = Ω d H , {\displaystyle \mathrm {X} _{H}=\left({\frac {\partial H}{\partial p_{i}}},-{\frac {\partial H}{\partial q^{i}}}\right)=\Omega \,\mathrm {d} H,}
where Ω {\displaystyle \Omega } is a 2 n × 2 n {\displaystyle 2n\times 2n} square matrix
Ω = [ 0 I n − I n 0 ] , {\displaystyle \Omega ={\begin{bmatrix}0&I_{n}\\-I_{n}&0\\\end{bmatrix}},}
and
d H = [ ∂ H ∂ q i ∂ H ∂ p i ] . {\displaystyle \mathrm {d} H={\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {\partial H}{\partial q^{i}}}\\{\frac {\partial H}{\partial p_{i}}}\end{bmatrix}}.}
The matrix Ω {\displaystyle \Omega } is frequently denoted with J {\displaystyle \mathbf {J} } .
Suppose that M = R 2 n {\displaystyle M=\mathbb {R} ^{2n}} is the 2 n {\displaystyle 2n} -dimensional symplectic vector space with (global) canonical coordinates.
The notion of a Hamiltonian vector field leads to a skew-symmetric bilinear operation on the differentiable functions on a symplectic manifold M {\displaystyle M} , the Poisson bracket, defined by the formula
{ f , g } = ω ( X g , X f ) = d g ( X f ) = L X f g {\displaystyle \{f,g\}=\omega (X_{g},X_{f})=dg(X_{f})={\mathcal {L}}_{X_{f}}g}
where L X {\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}_{X}} denotes the Lie derivative along a vector field X {\displaystyle X} . Moreover, one can check that the following identity holds:6 X { f , g } = − [ X f , X g ] {\displaystyle X_{\{f,g\}}=-[X_{f},X_{g}]} ,
where the right hand side represents the Lie bracket of the Hamiltonian vector fields with Hamiltonians f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} . As a consequence (a proof at Poisson bracket), the Poisson bracket satisfies the Jacobi identity:7 { { f , g } , h } + { { g , h } , f } + { { h , f } , g } = 0 {\displaystyle \{\{f,g\},h\}+\{\{g,h\},f\}+\{\{h,f\},g\}=0} ,
which means that the vector space of differentiable functions on M {\displaystyle M} , endowed with the Poisson bracket, has the structure of a Lie algebra over R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } , and the assignment f ↦ X f {\displaystyle f\mapsto X_{f}} is a Lie algebra homomorphism, whose kernel consists of the locally constant functions (constant functions if M {\displaystyle M} is connected).
Lee 2003, Chapter 18. - Lee, J. M. (2003), Introduction to Smooth manifolds, Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 218, ISBN 0-387-95448-1 ↩
Lee 2003, Chapter 12. - Lee, J. M. (2003), Introduction to Smooth manifolds, Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 218, ISBN 0-387-95448-1 ↩
See Lee (2003, Chapter 18) for a very concise statement and proof of Noether's theorem. - Lee, J. M. (2003), Introduction to Smooth manifolds, Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 218, ISBN 0-387-95448-1 ↩