Single-stage-to-orbit

A single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) vehicle reaches <a href="/facts/Orbit/nD2TPySG">orbit</a> from the surface of a body using only propellants and fluids and without expending tanks, engines, or other major hardware. The term usually, but not exclusively refers to <a href="/facts/Reusable_launch_system/j0WC10op">reusable vehicles</a>. To date, no Earth-launched SSTO launch vehicles have ever been flown; orbital launches from Earth have been performed by <a href="/facts/Multistage_rocket/WNrmgztj">multi-stage rockets</a>, either fully or partially <a href="/facts/Expendable_launch_system/CaW43W5z">expendable</a>.
The main projected advantage of the SSTO concept is elimination of the hardware replacement inherent in expendable launch systems. However, the non-recurring costs associated with design, development, research and engineering (DDR&E) of reusable SSTO systems are much higher than expendable systems due to the substantial technical challenges of SSTO, assuming that those technical issues can in fact be solved. SSTO vehicles may also require a significantly higher degree of regular maintenance.
It is considered to be marginally possible to launch a single-stage-to-orbit <a href="/facts/Rocket_engine/XT5gaFAb">chemically fueled</a> spacecraft from Earth. The principal complicating factors for SSTO from Earth are: high orbital velocity of over 7,400 metres per second (27,000 km/h; 17,000 mph); the need to overcome Earth's gravity, especially in the early stages of flight; and flight within <a href="/facts/Atmosphere_of_Earth/FV97Am25">Earth's atmosphere</a>, which limits speed in the early stages of flight due to drag, and influences engine performance.
Advances in rocketry in the 21st century have resulted in a substantial fall in the cost to launch a kilogram of payload to either <a href="/facts/Low_Earth_orbit/rq1TwayJ">low Earth orbit</a> or the <a href="/facts/International_Space_Station/VNPUBz9m">International Space Station</a>, reducing the main projected advantage of the SSTO concept.
Notable single stage to orbit concepts include <a href="/facts/Skylon_(spacecraft)/b8YIGYjn">Skylon</a>, which used the hybrid-cycle SABRE engine that can use oxygen from the atmosphere when it is at low altitude, and then use onboard liquid oxygen after switching to the closed cycle rocket engine at high altitude, the McDonnell Douglas <a href="/facts/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X/Eka8jVUS">DC-X</a>, the <a href="/facts/Lockheed_Martin_X-33/yFcAGx1A">Lockheed Martin X-33</a> and <a href="/facts/VentureStar/HfchW0vm">VentureStar</a> which was intended to replace the Space Shuttle, and the <a href="/facts/Rotary_Rocket/8UldqDWp">Roton SSTO</a>, which is a helicopter that can get to orbit. However, despite showing some promise, none of them have come close to achieving orbit yet due to problems with finding a sufficiently efficient propulsion system and discontinued development.
Single-stage-to-orbit is much easier to achieve on extraterrestrial bodies that have weaker gravitational fields and lower atmospheric pressure than Earth, such as the Moon and Mars, and has been achieved from the <a href="/facts/Moon/zKHqEMPb">Moon</a> by the <a href="/facts/Apollo_program/IC1Ek1Ao">Apollo program</a>'s <a href="/facts/Apollo_Lunar_Module/XtvQS5K5">Lunar Module</a>, by several robotic spacecraft of the Soviet <a href="/facts/Luna_programme/9zjH1plI">Luna program</a>, and by China's <a href="/facts/Chang%2527e_5/EXfmqPAe">Chang'e 5</a> and <a href="/facts/Chang%2527e_6/m9VSzYzB">Chang'e 6</a> lunar sample return missions.

Single-stage-to-orbit open-in-new

Single-stage-to-orbit