Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
Plum pudding model
open-in-new
<p>The plum pudding model is an obsolete scientific model of the <a href="/facts/Atom/69syB8dH">atom</a>. It was first proposed by <a href="/facts/J._J._Thomson/Y4jyndJF">J. J. Thomson</a> in 1904 following his discovery of the <a href="/facts/Electron/L0KBo5cW">electron</a> in 1897, and was rendered obsolete by <a href="/facts/Ernest_Rutherford/hjjMEskl">Ernest Rutherford</a>'s discovery of the <a href="/facts/Atomic_nucleus/orpIm5Xl">atomic nucleus</a> in 1911. The model tried to account for two properties of atoms then known: that there are electrons, and that atoms have no net electric charge. Logically there had to be an equal amount of positive charge to balance out the negative charge of the electrons. As Thomson had no idea as to the source of this positive charge, he tentatively proposed that it was everywhere in the atom, and that the atom was spherical. This was the mathematically simplest hypothesis to fit the available evidence, or lack thereof. In such a sphere, the negatively charged electrons would distribute themselves in a more or less even manner throughout the volume, simultaneously repelling each other while being attracted to the positive sphere's center. </p><p>Despite Thomson's efforts, his model couldn't account for <a href="/facts/Emission_spectra/fxumR717">emission spectra</a> and <a href="/facts/Valence_(chemistry)/ck7cHByj">valencies</a>. Based on experimental studies of alpha particle scattering (in <a href="/facts/Rutherford_scattering_experiments/cmgI1Ha9">the gold foil experiment</a>), <a href="/facts/Ernest_Rutherford/hjjMEskl">Ernest Rutherford</a> developed an alternative <a href="/facts/Rutherford_model/xE2Glczp">model for the atom</a> featuring a compact nucleus where the positive charge is concentrated. </p><p>Thomson's model is popularly referred to as the "plum pudding model" with the notion that the electrons are distributed uniformly like raisins in a <a href="/facts/Plum_pudding/wbNRgGA8">plum pudding</a>. Neither Thomson nor his colleagues ever used this analogy. It seems to have been coined by popular science writers to make the model easier to understand for the layman. The analogy is perhaps misleading because Thomson likened the positive sphere to a liquid rather than a solid since he thought the electrons moved around in it. </p>